This study investigated the worldview of a group of Malaysian higher education students, identified as SL1M residents, in the virtual world of Second Life over a period of more than two years, from 2012 to the present. Examining the representation of the participants' senses, thoughts, and actions via their avatars, the purpose of this study is to investigate the worldview elements that contribute to the behavior modeling from the virtual world that result in the development of the so-called ePersonality. Within an ethnographic framework, the study utilized Kozinet's model of Netnography to characterize the online communities and groups in the virtual world, where people are represented by avatars. Six active, closely knit, and devoted members of the SL1M group were selected based on two a priori criteria and interviewed online via the Second Life platform to capture data. Coding was necessary for an insightful analysis of the transcribed interview. The researcher utilized two distinct categorization procedures. First, the researcher coded each interview separately using seven columned templates, and then the data were coded using Atlas.ti to search for themes and sub-themes that were not captured by manual coding. This study's findings revealed that elements such as fantasized character, attractive appearance, personal intention, development of false identity, and dual personality, among others, contributed to the development of their ePersonality by modeling their virtual world behavior. The study highlights the need for additional research to ascertain the effect of virtual platforms on the development of alternative personalities among Malaysian college students.
Aboujaoude, E. (2011). Virtually you: The dangerous powers of the e-personality. New York: W.W Norton & Company Inc.
Berghout, A. (2009). Toward an Islamic framework for worldview studies: Preliminary theorization. The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, 24(2), 22-43.
Buscemi, J. (2020). “Second Life” still has dedicated users in 2020. Here’s what keeps them sticking around. Retrieved from https://www.mic.com/p/second-life-still-hasdedicated-users-in-2020-heres-what-keeps-them-sticking-around-18693758
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). USA: SAGE Publication.
Funk, K. (2001). What is worldview? Retrieved from http://web.engr.oregonstate.edu/~funkk/Personal/worldview.html
Furber, M. (2009). Ethics & virtual worlds: Second life as a case study. In Tabah analytic brief.Abu Dhabi, U.A.E.: Tabah Foundation.
Gadalla, E., Abosag, I., and Keeling, K. (2016), "Second Life as a research environment: avatarbased focus groups (AFG)", Qualitative Market Research, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-08-2015-0070
Holzwarth, M., Janiszewski, C., & Neumann, M. M. (2006). The influence of avatars on online consumer shopping behaviour. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 19-36.
Kamal, B. M., Ismael, S. A., & Norhayati, M. Y. (2012). An exploratory study on the impact of virtual second life on the Islamic worldview of higher education student. IIUM Repository (IREP). http://irep.iium.edu.my/id/eprint/36414
Kozinets, R. V. (2010a). Netnography: The marketer’s secret weapon: How social media understanding drives innovation. Retrieved from http://info.netbase.com/rs/netbase/images/netnography_wp.pdf
Kozinets, R. V. (2010b). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Kozinets, R. V., & Gambetti, R. (2020). Netnography Unlimited: Understanding Technoculture using Qualitative Social Media Research. London: Routledge
Lavoie, R., Main, C., King, C., & King, D., (2020). Virtual Experience, Real Consequences: The Potential Negative Emotional Consequences of Virtual Reality Gameplay. Virtual Reality (2021) 25:69-81
Yusof, N. M., & Ariffin, W. N. J. W. (2021). The Worldview of Malay Youths in the Virtual World of Second Life: The Real-World Escapism. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(3), 700-707.
