This study explores the intricacies of statutory bodies in two distinct and dynamic countries, namely Singapore and Australia. An extensive examination uncovers the resemblances and disparities in the governance frameworks of these institutions, highlighting the pivotal function that these organisations fulfil in shaping public policy and upholding accountability. While Singapore adopts a centralised and hierarchical approach, in contrast to Australia's decentralised one, it is noteworthy that both countries have a strong commitment to upholding transparency and safeguarding the public interest. This comparative study offers valuable insights into the evolving landscape of statutory bodies and serves as a guiding tool for investigating governance in a rapidly changing society.
Altman, J., and Ward, S. (2018). “Competition and Consumer Issues for Indigenous Australians: A Report to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission by the Centre for Aboriginal ….”
Arantes, J. A. (2022). “New Corporate Players and Educational Policy: How Might the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Help Us to Understand AI’s Associations with Educational Policy?” Research in Education 114 (1): 45–63.
Aulich, C., and O’Flynn, J. (2007). “From Public to Private: The Australian Experience of Privatisation.” Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 29 (2): 153–71
Ballatore, B. F. (2014). “The Reform of the Public Administration in Singapore: A Model to Follow in Italy?”
Bellows, T. J. (2009). “Meritocracy and the Singapore Political System.” Asian Journal of Political Science 17 (1): 24–44.
Calder, K. E. (2016). “Singapore: Smart City, Smart State.
Cheng-Han, T., Puchniak, D. W., and Varottil, U. (2014). “State-Owned Enterprises in Singapore: Historical Insights into a Potential Model for Reform.” Colum. J. Asian L.
Chin, L. (2004). “Public Housing Governance in Singapore: Current Issues and Challenges.” Unpublished Report, Department of Real Estate, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Chua, B. H. (2014). “Navigating Between Limits: The Future of Public Housing in Singapore.” Housing Studies 29 (4): 520–33.
Finance. (2017). “Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013,” August. https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2017C00269.
Grant, R. (2005). “The Uhrig Review and the Future of Statutory Authorities,” May.
Gwee. (2013). Case Studies in Public Governance: Building Institutions in Singapore. Routledge.
Haila, A. (2015). Urban Land Rent: Singapore as a Property State. John Wiley & Sons.
Haque, M. S. (2009). “Public Administration and Public Governance in Singapore.” Public Administration and Public Governance in ASEAN and Korea, 246–71.
“Home.” (2023). Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. June 5, 2023. https://www.accc.gov.au/.
“Housing and Development Act 1959 - Singapore Statutes Online.” n.d. Accessed June 5, 2023. https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/HDA1959.
“HSE: Information about Health and Safety at Work.” n.d. Accessed June 5, 2023. https://www.hse.gov.uk/.
Huat, C. B. (2016). “State-Owned Enterprises, State Capitalism and Social Distribution in Singapore.” The Pacific Review 29 (4): 499–521.
Jones, D. S. (2006). “Financial Reforms of Statutory Bodies in Singapore: Control and Autonomy in a Centralized State.” Public Organization Review 6 (3): 259–76.
Kalokerinos, J. (2004). “Corporate Governance in Statutory Authorities: The Uhrig Review.” Keeping Good Companies.
Katz, M. L. (2001). “Reform of Credit Card Schemes in Australia.” rba.gov.au. 2001.
Massey, A. (2006). “AGENCIES: HOW GOVERNMENTS DO THINGS THROUGH SEMI-AUTONOMOUS ORGANISATIONS - Edited by Christopher Pollitt, Colin Talbot, Janice Caulfield and Amanda Smullen.” Public Administration 84 (3): 808–10.
Mcmenemy, L. (2019). “Proactive Governance Reduces Reactive Compliance.” Diligent. July 31, 2019.https://www.diligent.com/insights/corporate-governance/proactive-governance-reduces-reactive-compliance/.
Milhaupt, C. J., and Pargendler, M. (2017). “Governance Challenges of Listed State-Owned Enterprises Around the World: National Experiences and a Framework for Reform.”
Needham, B. (2017). “Urban Land Rent: Singapore as a Property State.” Housing, Theory and Society 34 (2): 250–52.
OAIC. (2023). “The Privacy Act.” OAIC. March 10, 2023.
https://www.oaic.gov.au/privacy/privacy-legislation/the-privacy-act.
“OINcpIm-002.pdf.” n.d. http://ncp.ncc.gov.au/docs/OINcpIm-002.pdf.
Phang, S. Y., and Helble, M. (2016). “Housing Policies in Singapore.”
“Public Sector (Governance) Act 2018 - Singapore Statutes Online.” n.d. Accessed June 5, 2023. https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Acts-Supp/5-2018/Published/20211231?DocDate=20180305.
Quah, J. S. T. (1975). “Administrative Reform and Development Administration in Singapore: A Comparative Study of the Singapore Improvement Trust and the Housing and Development Board. (volumes I and I I).”
Quah, J. S. T. (2010). “Chapter 11 Public Administration Singapore-Style.” In Public Administration Singapore-Style, 19:237–56. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
———. (2018). “Why Singapore Works: Five Secrets of Singapore’s Success.” Public Administration and Policy An Asia-Pacific Journal 21 (1): 5–21.
Saunders, B. B. (2020). “Responsible Government, Statutory Authorities and the Australian Constitution.” Federal Law Review 48 (1): 4–29.
Seng, L. K. (2009). “History, Memory, and Identity in Modern Singapore: Testimonies from the Urban Margins.” The Oral History Review 36 (1): 1–24.
Rod, S. (2014). “Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Priorities.” AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF COMPETITION AND CONSUMER LAW 22 (3): 184–91.
“Statutory Bodies and Government Companies (Protection of Secrecy) Act 1983 - Singapore Statutes Online.” n.d. Accessed June 5, 2023. https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/SBGCPSA1983.
Tan, K. (1999). The Singapore Legal System. NUS Press.
Taylor, J. (2006). “Statutory Bodies and Performance Reporting: Hong Kong and Singapore Experience.” Public Organization Review 6 (3): 289–304.
Teo, T. S. H. (2005). “Meeting the Challenges of Knowledge Management at the Housing and Development Board.” Decision Support Systems 41 (1): 147–59.
Thynne, I. (2006). “Statutory Bodies: How Distinctive and in What Ways?” Public Organization Review 6 (3): 171–84.
“U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.” n.d. US EPA. Accessed June 5, 2023. https://www.epa.gov/.
Verhoest, K. (2018). “Agencification in Europe.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, edited by Edoardo Ongaro and Sandra Van Thiel, 327–46. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Wettenhall, R. (2005). “Notes on the Long History of Statutory Bodies and the Shorter History of Other Forms of Non-Departmental Public Body (NDPB) in Australia.” Comparative Studies of Organizations in the Public.
Wettenhall, R. L. (1979). “Commonwealth Statutory Authorities: Exploring the Field.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 38 (2): 176–89.
Wettenhall, R. (2004). “Let Us Explore the Common Ground: Agencies, Public Corporations and Regulatory Commissions.” Society and Economy. In Central and Eastern Europe ? Journal of the Corvinus University of Budapest 26 (2-3): 263–93.
Wettenhall, R. (2005). “Parliamentary Oversight of Statutory Authorities: A Post-Uhrig Perspective.” Australasian Parliamentary Review 20 (2): 39–63.
Woo, J. J. (2015). “Singapore’s Policy Style: Statutory Boards as Policymaking Units.” Journal of Asian Public Policy 8 (2): 120–33.
Yihan, G. (2008). “A Comparative Account of Statutory Interpretation in Singapore.” Statute Law Review 29 (3): 195–229.
Zucker, L. G. (1987). “Institutional Theories of Organization.” Annual Review of Sociology 13 (1): 443–64.
In-Text Citation: (Song et al., 2023)
To Cite this Article: Song, L., Kitili, I. M., & Ren, Y. (2023). Navigating Governance: A Comparative Analysis of Statutory Bodies in Singapore and Australia. International Journal of Academic Research in Public Policy and Governace, 9(1), 84–107.
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
