The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of Computational Thinking Techniques on Student Interest to Science and Mathematics subject at schools in Sarawak. The study was conducted on two different types of data collection, online survey, and interview session. A total of 217 respondents responded been selected from teachers and student primary and secondary schools. The teachers selected based contribution on The Computationally Thinking and Computer Science (CTCS) teaching certificate program and recognized on teaching subject STEM-based. The findings can be referred to by the policymaker and Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Research (MESTR) on educational experiences in schools. We recognize that some other challenges on practice CT technique required policy to empower education system on schools in Malaysia. However, CT techniques be challenged when countries are hit by the pandemic COVID-19.
Abdul, W. N., Talib, O., Razali, F., & Kamarudin, N. (2021). The Big Why of Implementing Computational Thinking In STEM Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(3), 272–289. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i3.706
Anderson, N. D. (2016). A Call for Computational Thinking in Undergraduate Psychology. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 15(3), 226–234.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725716659252
Basu, S., Biswas, G., Sengupta, P., Dickes, A., Kinnebrew, J. S., & Clark, D. (2016). Identifying middle school students’ challenges in computational thinking-based science learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0036-2
Bati, K. (2021). A systematic literature review regarding computational thinking and programming in early childhood education. Education and Information Technologies, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10700-2
EL-Deghaidy, H., Mansour, N., Alzaghibi, M., & Alhammad, K. (2017). Context of STEM integration in schools: Views from in-service science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2459–2484. https://doi.org/10.12973/EURASIA.2017.01235A
Günbatar, M. S., & Bak?rc?, H. (2019). STEM teaching intention and computational thinking skills of pre-service teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1615–1629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9849-5
Harimurti, R., Ekohariadi, Munoto, & Igp Asto, B. (2019). The concept of computational thinking toward information and communication technology learning. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 535(1), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/535/1/012004
Li, Q. (2021). Computational thinking and teacher education: An expert interview study. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(2), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.224
Lu, J. J., & Fletcher, G. H. L. (2009). Thinking about computational thinking. SIGCSE Bulletin Inroads, 41(1), 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1145/1539024.1508959
Moschella, M. (2019). Computational thinking at primary school: Didactical and psychological aspects. Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE, 344–345. https://doi.org/10.1145/3304221.3325599
Najibulla, R., Corrienna, A. T., & Nur W.(2018). The Necessity of Computational Thinking in STEM Education?: An Analysis with Recommended Research. Learning Science and Mathematics, 0832(13), 1–12.
Papert, S. (1980). Children, Computer, and Powerful Ideas 2nd Edition. MINDSTORMS: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas, 19–37.
Ramli, N., & Talib, O. (2017). Can Education Institution Implement STEM? From Malaysian Teachers’ View. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(3), 721–732. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i3/2772
Rinke, C. R., Gladstone-Brown, W., Kinlaw, C. R., & Cappiello, J. (2016). Characterizing STEM Teacher Education: Affordances and Constraints of Explicit STEM Preparation for Elementary Teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 116(6), 300–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12185
Selby, C., & Woollard, J. (2013). Computational Thinking?: The Developing Definition. ITiCSE Conference 2013, 5–8.
Sun, L., Hu, L., Yang, W., Zhou, D., & Wang. (2021). STEM learning attitude predicts computational thinking skills among primary school students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(2), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12493
Swaid, S. I. (2015). Bringing Computational Thinking to STEM Education. Procedia Manufacturing, 3(Ahfe), 3657–3662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.761
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6
Wang, C., Shen, J., & Chao, J. (2021). Integrating Computational Thinking in STEM Education: A Literature Review. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10227-5
White, D. W. (2012). What Is STEM Education and Why Is It Important? Congressional Research Service, August, 1–15.
https://www.ccc.edu/departments/Documents/STEM_labor.pdf
Williams, P. J., & Mangan, J. (2016). The Effectiveness of Using Young Professionals to Influence STEM Career Choices of Secondary School Students. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 2(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.51355/jstem.2016.19
Wing, J. M. (2010). Computational Thinking: What and Why? Thelink - The Magaizne of the Varnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science, March 2006, 1–6. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/link/research-notebook-computational-thinking-what-and-why
Wing, J. M. (2016). Computational Thinking. March 2006.
Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/2576872
Yadav, A., Stephenson, C., & Hong, H. (2017). Computational thinking for teacher education. Communications of the ACM, 60(4), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/2994591
