International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Student and Educator Perceptions of Prevalence of Use, Attitude and Views about Sheng Speakers

Open access
This study tested the difference and relationship between student and educator perceptions of prevalence of students’ use, attitude, and views about sheng speakers in selected schools in Gucha District, Kenya. Two hundred and thirty nine (239) students and thirty three (33) educators participated. The test of differences revealed there was a significant difference in the educators’ and teachers’ perceptions on the prevalence of the use of sheng, Students’ attitudes toward the use of sheng, positive views about sheng speakers, and negative views about sheng speakers. There was a significant relationship between the respondents’ perceptions on the prevalence of the use of sheng and students’ attitudes toward sheng and positive views about sheng speakers. Those who hold positive views use sheng or are in favor of its use while those who do not use it hold negative views on its use. Teachers should perfect the teaching of standard forms so that learners can identify boundaries between various forms of language use. Sheng can be a threat to purism of English and Kiswahili and measures should be taken to stem the negative ramifications it is likely to bring to the teaching and learning of standard Swahili.
Abdulaziz, M.H & Osinde, K. (1997).Sheng and Engsh: Development of mixed codes among
urban youths in Kenya. In International journal of the sociology of Language, 125, 43-63.

Asiba, A (1985).Can sheng stand the Test of Time? Sunday Nation, Nairobi. August 30.

Bourdieu,Pierre (1991)Language and symbolic Power, Cambridge Massachusetts. Harvard
University Press

Chimerah, R.M. (1998).Kiswahili: Past, Present and Future Horizons; Nairobi: Nairobi
University Press.

Dittmar,Norbert and schlobinski,Peter(1988)The sociolinguistics of Urban Vernaculars. Case
studies and their Evaluation. Berlin. NY. W.de.Gruyter.

Fink,T. (2005)Attitudes towards languages in Nairobi. Masters Thesis, Michigan State
University.

Githinji, P. (2008).Ambivalent Attitudes: Perception of sheng and its speakers. Ohio
University, U.S.A: Nordic Journal of African Studies 17(2), 113-136.
Githiora, C. (2002). Sheng: Peer Language, Swahili Dialect or Emerging Creole? Journal of African Studies, 15.159-181.

Hornsey, Mathew and Hogg, Michael. (2000). Assimilation and Diversity: An Integrative
Model of Subgroup Relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review 4(2), 143–156.

Iraki, F.K. (2004).’Cognitive Efficiency: The sheng Phenomenon in Kenya’. Pragmatics, vol.14.1:55-68

King’ei, G.K & Kobia, J. (2007).Lugha Kama kitambulisho: changamoto ya sheng Nchini
Kenya. Nordic journal of African Studies 16(3), 320-332.
K.N.E.C. (1998).Kiswahili Paper 2,102/2, Nairobi: Kenya National Examinations Council.
Krauss,R.Mand Chiu,CY.(1998) Language and social Behavior,New York. McGraw Hill.
Lave, J.and Wenger,E.(1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral
articipation.Cambridge.Cambrdge University Press.
Mbaabu, I. (1996).Language Policy in East Africa, Nairobi, General Printers.
Mbaabu, I. &Nzunga, K. (2003) English-Kiswahili Dictionary of sheng: Deciphering East
Africa’s under-world Language.Dar es Salaam: TUKI.

Moga, Jacko and Fee Dan. (2000). Sheng Dictionary. Nairobi: Ginseng Publishing co.Ltd.
Momanyi, C. (2009).’The Effects of sheng in the Teaching of Kiswahili in Kenyan Schools,
The journal of Pan African Studies 2(8), 127-138.

Muaka, L. (2011) Language perceptions and identity among Kenyan speakers, Winston,
Salem State University, North Carolina.

Mukhebi, L. (1986). Is Language and culture Inseparable? Kenya Times, Nairobi. May 28.
Njogu, K. (2005).National Exams and the case of Kiswahili as a National Language. The
Nation, Nairobi. May 24.

Ogechi, N.O. (2002) Trilingual Code Switching in Kenya: Evidence from Ekegusii Kiswahili, English and Sheng.Unpublished PhD Thesis. Hamburg: University of Hamburg.

Ogechi, N.O. (2005).On Lexicalisation in sheng.Nordic Journal of African Studies, 14(3), 334-335.

Osinde, K. (1986).Sheng: An investigationInto the Social and Structural Aspects of an Evolving Language. Unpublished B.A.Dissertation.Nairobi: University of Nairobi.

Preston, D.R. (2000). Change in the perception of language varieties. In: J. Fisiak (ed.),
Historical Dialectology: Regional and Social, pp. 475–504. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Rinkanya, A.N. (2005).Sheng Literature in Kenya: A Revival? In H.Indangasi &M. Odari (Eds).The Nairobi Journal of Literature, Number 3.Nairobi: Department of Literature, University of Nairobi.

Rono, M. (2001).We should Arise and Save Kiswahili. The people, Nairobi.
Samper, D. (2002). Talking Sheng: The role of a hybrid language in the construction of
identity and youth culture in Nairobi, Kenya.Ph.D Dissertation University of Pennsylvania.

Shiundu, J.S. & Omulando S.J. (1992) Curriculum Development: Theory and
Practice,Nairobi: Oxford SUniversity Press.

Spyropoulous, M. (1987).’Sheng: Some preliminary Investigations into a recently emerged
Nairobi street language’. Journal of the Anthropological society of Oxford, 18:125-136.Uta Reuster-jahn.

Tajfel, Henri.1982. Social psychology of intergroup relations . Annual Review of Psychology 33, 1–39 .