This concept paper explores the potential of blended learning as a transformative approach to enhance STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education in secondary schools. Blended learning, integrating online digital resources with traditional classroom instruction, promises to revolutionize the educational landscape. The concept is grounded in the premise that this hybrid model can address diverse learning styles, foster a deeper understanding of complex subjects, and cater to individual student needs more effectively than conventional methods. The paper proposes a comprehensive framework to examine how blended learning impacts student engagement, comprehension, and achievement in STEM subjects. It advocates for a balanced integration of digital tools and face-to-face interaction, emphasizing personalized learning paths, interactive content, and collaborative project-based activities. The paper also delves into the challenges and considerations of implementing blended learning, such as technological accessibility, teacher training, and curriculum design. By providing a theoretical and practical overview, this concept paper aims to guide educators, administrators, and policymakers in developing and implementing effective blended learning strategies to enhance STEM education, thereby preparing students for the demands of the 21st-century workforce. The envisioned outcome is a more engaging, relevant, and effective STEM education that not only improves academic performance but also ignites a lasting interest in these crucial fields.
Ahmed, S., Minnaert, A., & Van de Wyer, M. (2018). Intrinsic motivation, task value, and
achievement in secondary STEM education. Learning and Instruction, 56, 81-97.
Ajmal, S. F., & Hafeez, M. (2021). Critical Review on Flipped Classroom Model Versus Traditional Lecture Method. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(1), 128-140.
Alkhatib, O. J. (2018). An interactive and blended learning model for engineering education. Journal of Computers in Education, 5(1), 19-48.
Al-Samarraie, H., & Saeed, N. (2018). A systematic review of cloud computing tools for
collaborative learning: Opportunities and challenges to the blended-learning environment. Computers & Education, 124, 77-91.
Ali, A., & Rauf, M. B. (2023). Designing A Blended Learning Model for Public Sector Universities of Pakistan. Voyage Journal of Educational Studies, 3(4), 94-118.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Ardianti, S., Sulisworo, D., & Pramudya, Y. (2019). Efektivitas blended learning berbasis
pendekatan stem education berbantuan schoology untuk meningkatkan critical thinking skill pada materi fluida dinamik. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Kaluni, 2. https://doi.org/10.30998/prokaluni.v2i0.67
Aydogdu, M., & Yalvac, B. (2022). The effect of inquiry-based learning on students' achievement and motivation in science education. Education and Human Sciences, 14(2), 329-342.
Ba, S., Stein, D., Liu, Q., Long, T., Xie, K., & Wu, L. (2021). Examining the effects of a pedagogical agent with dual-channel emotional cues on learner emotions, cognitive load, and knowledge transfer performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(6), 1114-1134.
Bacovic, M., Andrijasevic, Z., & Pejovic, B. (2022). STEM education and growth in Europe. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(3), 2348-2371.
Banks, F., & Barlex, D. M. (2014). Beyond the subject silos in STEM–the case for ‘looking sideways' in the secondary school curriculum.
Baran, E., Canbazoglu Bilici, S., Mesutoglu, C., & Ocak, C. (2019). The impact of an out?of?school STEM education program on students’ attitudes toward STEM and STEM careers. School Science and Mathematics, 119(4), 223-235.
Blankenburg, J. S.,Höffler, T.N.,&Parchmann, I. (2016). Fostering today what is needed tomorrow: Investigatingstudents’interestsinscience.ScienceEducation,100,364–391.
Bettencourt, G. M., Manly, C. A., Kimball, E., & Wells, R. S. (2020). STEM degree completion
and first-generation college students: A cumulative disadvantage approach to the outcomes gap. The Review of Higher Education, 43(3), 753-779.
Boisjoly, R. (2021). Recognition of Value: A Critical Step in the Value Creation Process.
Callahan, C., Howell, J. B., & Maddox, L. E. (2019). Selecting and designing visual curriculum
materials for inquiry-based instruction. Social Studies Research and Practice, 14(3), 321-334.
Castro, R. (2019). Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 2523-2546.
Chachashvili-Bolotin, S., Milner-Bolotin, M., & Lissitsa, S. (2016). Examination of factors
predicting secondary students’ interest in tertiary STEM education. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3): 366–390.
http://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1143137
Cronje, J. C. (2021). Covid-19 Policy Implications for Blended Learning in Higher Education in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Progressio, 41(1), 16-pages.
Domann, M. (2020). Los Angeles County Public Works’ STEM Outreach Program and Female
Students’ Decision to Pursue a Degree in STEM (Doctoral dissertation, California State University, Northridge).
Denson, C. D., & Hill, R. B. (2010). Impact of an engineering mentorship program on African-
American male high school students’ perceptions and self-efficacy. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 47(1): 99-127.
Dziuban, C., Graham, C., Moskal, P., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning:
the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5
El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its
impact on development students' engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-24.
Eugenijus, L. (2023). Integrating Blended Learning and STEM Education: Innovative
Approaches to Promote Interdisciplinary Learning. Research and Advances in Education, 2(9), 20-36.
Fan, S. C., & Yu, K. C. (2017). How an integrative STEM curriculum can benefit students in
engineering design practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27, 107-129.
Fazal, M., & Bryant, M. (2019). Blended learning in middle school math: The question of
effectiveness. Journal of Online Learning Research, 5(1), 49-64.
Fernández, I., Burgueño, R., & Gil?Espinosa, F. (2021). High school physical education
teachers’ perceptions of blended learning one year after the onset of the covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), 11146. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111146
Ginting, D., Barella, Y., Linarsih, A., & Woods, R. (2021, November). Emergency remote teaching practices in the perspective of cognitive load of multimedia learning theory. In 1st International Conference of Education, Social and Humanities (INCESH 2021) (pp. 96-106). Atlantis Press.
Glazer, F. S. (Ed.). (2023). Blended learning: Across the disciplines, across the academy. Taylor & Francis.
Gonzalez, H. B. (2014). The National Science Foundation: Background and Selected Policy Issues. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
Gottfried, A. E., Preston, K. S. J., Gottfried, A. W., Oliver, P. H., Delany, D. E., & Ibrahim, S. M.
(2016). Pathways from parental stimulation of children’s curiosity to high school science course accomplishments and science career interest and skill. International Journal of Science Education, 38(12): 1972–1995. http://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016. 1220690
Gottfried, A. E. (2020). Intrinsic motivation and the adolescent student. In Handbook of youth and adolescence (pp. 56-75). Springer, Cham.
Gough, A. (2014). STEM policy and science education: scientistic curriculum and sociopolitical silences. Springer Journal, 10(14): 234-256. http://doi.org/10. 1007/s11422-014-9590-3
Haryadi, R., Situmorang, R., & Khaerudin, K. (2021). Enhancing Students' High-Order Thinking Skills through STEM-Blended Learning on Kepler's Law During Covid-19 Outbreak. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 7(2), 168-192.
Herman, L., Adnan, A., & Yurniwati, Y. (2021). Effect of blended learning on students' learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 11(2), 309-325. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v11.i2.202113
Hernandez, P. R., Paolillo, J. G., & Su, R. (2022). Fostering STEM identity through mentor
programs: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 92(2), 206-255.
Hirudayaraj, M., & Mati?, J. (2021). Leveraging human resource development practice to
enhance organizational creativity: A multilevel conceptual model. Human Resource Development Review, 20(2), 172-206.
Hsu, R., and Tsai, T. (2022). Assessing the impact of a project-based learning robotics course
with integrating of stem education using content analysis method. European Journal of Stem Education, 7(1), 09. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/12633
Huang, Q., and Lee, V. (2022). Exploring first-year university students' blended learning
experiences during the covid-19 through the community of inquiry model. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 39(4), 373-385.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijilt-02-2022-0024
Jalinus, N. (2021). Developing blended learning model in vocational education based on 21st
century integrated learning and industrial revolution 4.0. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(8), 1239-1254.
Jensen, F., & Sjaastad, J. (2013). a Norwegian Out-of-School Mathematics Project’S Influence on Secondary Students’ Stem Motivation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(6): 1437–1461. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9401-4
Juškevi?ien?, A., Dagien?, V., & Dolgopolovas, V. (2021). Integrated activities in STEM
environment: Methodology and implementation practice. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(1), 209-228.
Karaka?, A. and Hidiro?lu, Ç. (2022). Transdisciplinary role of technology in stem education.
Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 276-293. https://doi.org/10.52380/mojet.2022.10.4.411
Kelley, T., and Knowles, J. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated stem education.
International Journal of Stem Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Koculu, A., and Girgin, S. (2022). The effect of e-stem education on students’ perceptions and
engineering design process about environmental issues. World Journal of Education, 12(6), 49. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v12n6p49
Krismadinata, K., Verawardina, U., Jalinus, N., Rizal, F., Sukardi, S., Sudira, P., … &
Novaliendry, D. (2020). Blended learning as instructional model in vocational education: literature review. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11B), 5801-5815. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082214
Kruglanski, A. W. (2018). Violent radicalism and the psychology of prepossession. Social
Psychological Bulletin, 13(4), 1-18.
Lamanauskas, V., Makarskait?-Petkevi?ien?, R., Gorghiu, G., Manea, V., & Pribeanu, C. (2021).
Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation in online education during the pandemic as perceived by lithuanian and romanian university students.
https://doi.org/10.37789/rochi.2021.1.1.23
Tahunan, L. (2016). Akademi Sains Negara. Malaysia
Lawson, A., Davis, C., & Son, J. (2019). Not all flipped classes are the same: Using learning
science to design flipped classrooms. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 19(5).
Lian, Y., Tsang, K., & Zhang, Y. (2021). The construction and sustainability of teachers’
positive emotions toward stem educational work. Sustainability, 13(11), 5769. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115769
Locke, E. A., & Schattke, K. (2019). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Time for expansion and
clarification. Motivation Science, 5(4), 277.
Lynch, T., & Ghergulescu, I. (2017). Review of virtual labs as the emerging technologies for
teaching STEM subjects. INTED2017 proceedings, 6082-6091.
Martins, A., Costa, C., & Santos, M. (2021). Project-based learning in STEM education: A
systematic literature review. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 5(4
Martyniuk, O., Martyniuk, O., ????????, ?., & Muzyka, I. (2021). Educational direction
of stem in the system of realization of blended teaching of physics. Educational Technology Quarterly, 2021(3), 347-359. https://doi.org/10.55056/etq.39
Miller, K., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. (2018). The influence of students’ participation in STEM
competitions on their interest in STEM careers. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 8(2), 95-114.
Ministery of Education (MOE). (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia (PPPM 2013-
2025).
Ministery of Education (MOE). (2015). Pembelajaran abad ke-21: Amalan dan Pelaksanaan di
sekolah. Buletin Anjakan: Buletin Transformasi Pendidikan Malaysia 2013–2016. http://www.padu.edu.my/files/Anjakan_Bil_4_(2015)_Final.pdf.
Mutakinati, L., Anwari, I., & Kumano, Y. (2018). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skill
of middle school through stem education project-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Ipa Indonesia, 7(1), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.10495
Naidoo, J., and Singh-Pillay, A. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions of using the blended learning
approach for stem-related subjects within the fourth industrial revolution. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(4), 583-593. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.583
Nientied, P., & Toska, M. (2019). Motivation of knowledge workers–the case of
albania. Organizacija, 52(1), 33-44.
Nili, F., & Tasavori, M. (2022). Linking an autonomy-supportive climate and employee creativity: The influence of intrinsic motivation and company support for creativity. European Business Review, 34(5), 666-688.
Noni, N., Jabu, B., Basri, M., Ziska, I., Agung, M., Mas'ud, B., & Dangnga, M. (2019). Need
analysis to design blended learning model: an instructional design to create a dynamic, engaging and student-centered learning environment.. https://doi.org/10.2991/icamr-18.2019.19
Novaliendry, D. (2020). Blended learning as instructional model in vocational education:
literature review. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11B), 5801-5815. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082214
Ojaleye, O., & Awofala, A. O. (2018). Blended Learning and Problem-Based Learning
Instructional Strategies as Determinants of Senior Secondary School Students' Achievement in Algebra. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(2), 486-501.
Owston, R., York, D., Malhotra, T., & Sitthiworachart, J. (2020). Blended learning in stem
and non-stem courses: how do student performance and perceptions compare?. Online Learning, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i3.2151
Putra, P., Ahmad, N., Wahyuni, S., & Narulita, E. (2021). Analysis of the factors influencing
of pre-service science teacher in conceptualization of stem education: self-efficacy and content knowledge. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Ipa, 7(SpecialIssue), 225-230. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7ispecialissue.877
Rahman, Z., Rijanto, T., Basuki, I., & Sumbawati, M. (2020). The implementation of blended
learning model on motivation and students’ learning achievement. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 2(9).
https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v2i9.2694
Rathore, A. S., Sharma, A., & Massoudi, M. (2021). Personalized Engineering Education Model
Based on Artificial Intelligence for Learning Programming. In 2021 6th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Security (ICCCS) (pp. 1-10). IEEE.
Sahin, D., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2020). The effect of Augmented Reality Technology on middle school students' achievements and attitudes towards science education. Computers & Education, 144, 103710.
Sepp, S., Howard, S. J., Tindall-Ford, S., Agostinho, S., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive load theory
and human movement: Towards an integrated model of working memory. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 293-317.
Serrano, D. R., Dea?Ayuela, M. A., Gonzalez?Burgos, E., Serrano?Gil, A., & Lalatsa, A. (2019).
Technology?enhanced learning in higher education: How to enhance student engagement through blended learning. European Journal of Education, 54(2), 273-286.
Setiadi, D. (2022). The management of blended learning during covid 19 pandemic of private
senior high school in narmada., 388-394. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-21-3_42
Siddiqui, D. A. (2019). Impact of motivation on employees performance in Pakistan. Business Management and Strategy, 10(1), 1-22.
Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the best of online and face-to-face learning:
Hybrid and blended learning approach for COVID-19, post vaccine, & post-pandemic world. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 140-171.
Sunardi, J., Geok, S., Komarudin, K., Yuliarto, H., & Meikahani, R. (2021). Effect of
blended learning, motivation, study hour on student learning achievement. Jurnal Keolahragaan, 9(2), 168-177. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v9i2.40508
Szulawski, M., Ka?mierczak, I., & Prusik, M. (2021). Is self-determination good for your
effectiveness? A study of factors which influence performance within self-determination theory. PLoS One, 16(9), e0256558.
Takeda, K., Sumiyoshi, T., Matsumoto, M., Murayama, K., Ikezawa, S., Matsumoto, K., &
Nakagome, K. (2018). Neural correlates for intrinsic motivational deficits of schizophrenia; implications for therapeutics of cognitive impairment. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 178.
Tan, C., Zakuan, N., & Aziz, M. (2022). Recent trends of blended learning and flipped
classroom in malaysia. Arab World English Journal, (2), 290-301. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/covid2.19
Timotheou, S., & Ioannou, A. (2021). Collective creativity in STEAM Making activities. The
Journal of Educational Research, 114(2), 130-138.
Topping, K. J., Douglas, W., Robertson, D., & Ferguson, N. (2022). Effectiveness of online and
blended learning from schools: A systematic review. Review of Education, 10(2), e3353.
Trevallion, D., & Trevallion, T. (2020). STEM: Design, implement and evaluate. International
Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 14(8), 1-19.
Uzunboylu, H. (2019). Editorial. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v6i5.4381
Vallée, A., Blacher, J., Cariou, A., & Sorbets, E. (2020). Blended learning compared to
traditional learning in medical education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(8), e16504. https://doi.org/10.2196/16504
Wahono, B., Narulita, E., Chang, C., Darmawan, E., & Irwanto, I. (2021). The role of
students’ worldview on decision-making: an indonesian case study by a socio-scientific issue-based instruction through integrated stem education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 17(11), em2027.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11246
Wang, C., Dev, R., Soh, K., Nasirudddin, N., Yuan, Y., & Ji, X. (2023). Blended learning in
physical education: a systematic review. Frontiers in Public Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1073423
Wiebe, E., Unfried, A., & Faber, M. (2018). The relationship of STEM attitudes and career
interest. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10).
Xiong, Y., & Suen, H. K. (2018). Assessment approaches in massive open online courses:
Possibilities, challenges and future directions. International Review of Education, 64(2), 241-263.
Yavuz, F., & Ozdemir, S. (2019). Flipped Classroom Approach in EFL Context: Some Associated Factors. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 11(4), 238-244.
