Integrating digital technology into internal halal audits through the Digital Halal Audit App (DHAA) can enhance efficiency and value. DHAA assists Internal Halal Auditors (IHAs) in various audit tasks, fostering compliance and automation. This transformation of halal audits introduces automation, policy adherence, and operational assurance to management. However, discussions around DHAA acceptance within internal audits have been limited, particularly regarding factors influencing IHAs' acceptance. To bridge this gap, the research instrument for this study integrates the Task-Technology Fit (TTF), Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2), and religiosity factors. The study gathered perceptions from 30 Internal Halal Auditors representing companies listed in Malaysia's halal directory. Quantitative analysis using SPSS tools validated and supported the proposed model. This confirmatory study systematically achieved its objectives. It evaluated survey question clarity, assessed instrument validity and reliability, and refined the questionnaire. Through thorough analysis and participant feedback, this study aimed to validate the suitability of the proposed framework for evaluating DHAA acceptance among IHAs, contributing to a deeper understanding of technology integration within the context of internal halal audits.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
Berlak, J., Hafner, S., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2021). Digitalization’s impacts on productivity: A model-based approach and evaluation in Germany’s building construction industry. Production Planning and Control, 32(4), 335–345.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1740815
Cabrera-Sánchez, J. P., Villarejo-Ramos, Á. F., Liébana-Cabanillas, F., & Shaikh, A. A. (2021). Identifying relevant segments of AI applications adopters – Expanding the UTAUT2’s variables. Telematics and Informatics, 58(December 2019).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101529
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A Comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.
https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
Dolores, M., & Tongco, C. (2007). Definition of purposive sampling. A Journal of Plants, People and Applied Research, 5, 1–12.
https://ethnobotanyjournal.org/index.php/era/article/view/126
Dwivedi, Y. K., Shareef, M. A., Simintiras, A. C., Lal, B., & Weerakkody, V. (2016). A generalised adoption model for services: A cross-country comparison of mobile health (m-health). Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 174–187.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.06.003
Fewkes, J. H. (2019). Anthropological perspectives on the religious uses of mobile apps. In U. Jacqueline H. Fewkes Harriet L. Wilkes Honors College Florida Atlantic University Jupiter, FL (Ed.), Anthropological Perspectives on the Religious Uses of Mobile Apps. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26376-8
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10(2).
https://people.umass.edu/aizen/f&a1975.html
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 213–236.
Handoko, B. L., & Chu, N. C. (2021). UTAUT model in predicting auditor intention in adopting CAATS. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 144–153.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3481127.3481142
Hewavitharana, T., Nanayakkara, S., Perera, A., & Perera, P. (2021). Modifying the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model for the digital transformation of the construction industry from the user perspective. Informatics, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics8040081
Holdcroft, B. B. (2006). What is religiosity. Journal of Catholic Education, 10(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.15365/joce.1001082013
Janvrin, D., Lowe, D. J., & Bierstaker, J. (2008). Auditor acceptance of computer-assisted audit techniques. American Accounting Association Auditing Mid Year Meeting AAA, April, 1–26.
Johnstone, R. L. (1975). Religion and society in interaction. Prentice-Hall.
Jung, S., & Lee, S. (2011). Exploratory factor analysis for small samples. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 701–709. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0077-9
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rensis_Likert&oldid=1016466640
Malhotra. (1999). An assessment of the internet’s potential in enhancing consumer relationships justification of paradigm and methodology.
Mansour, E. M. (2016). Factors affecting the adoption of computer assisted audit techniques in audit process: Findings from Jordan. Business and Economic Research, 6(1), 248. https://doi.org/10.5296/ber.v6i1.8996
Mokhlis, S. (2009). Relevancy and measurement of religiosity in consumer behavior research. International Business Research, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v2n3p75
Musgrave, C. F., & McFarlane, E. A. (2004). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity, spiritual well-being, and attitudes toward spiritual care: a comparison of israeli jewish oncology nurses’ scores. Oncology Nursing Forum, 31(6).
Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, H. T., Mai, H. T., & Tran, T. T. M. (2020). Determinants of digital banking services in Vietnam: Applying utaut2 model. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 10(6), 680–697. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr.2020.106.680.697
Noordin, N., Noor, N. L. M., & Samicho, Z. (2014). Strategic approach to halal certification system: An ecosystem perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 121(September 2012), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1110
Nordin, A., Azhar, A. H., Fadilah, M. S. N. A., Zakaria, Z., & Zain, M. S. (2022). Halal Certificate Readiness Assessment (HaCeRa) Tool: Towards automation of the halal application process. International Journal on Perceptive and Cognitive Computing (IJPCC), 8(1), 11–18.
Oliveira, T., Faria, M., Thomas, M. A., & Popovi?, A. (2014). Extending the understanding of mobile banking adoption: When UTAUT meets TTF and ITM. International Journal of Information Management, 34(5), 689–703.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.06.004
Othman, R., Saffinee, S. S., Hashim, K. S. H.-Y. Y., Baharuddin, Z. M., Mahamod, L. H., & Ibrahim, M. (2015). Shariah compliant audit checklist for tourism accommodation premises. Advanced Science Letters, 21(6), 1721–1724.
https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2015.6147
Pallant, J. (2011). A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. In National Library of Australia (4th editio, Vol. 4). Allen & Unwin. www.librariesaustralia.nla.gov.au
Reed, K., Goolsby, J. R., & Johnston, M. K. (2016). Listening in and out: Listening to customers and employees to strengthen an integrated market-oriented system. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3591–3599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.002
Samuels, P. (2015). Advice on reliability analysis with small samples statistical methods – scale reliability analysis with small samples (Issue August). 2016, Birmingham City University, Centre for Academic Success. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1495.5364
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (EIGHT). Pearson Education Limited. www.pearsoned.co.uk
Soomro, Y. A. (2019). Understanding the adoption of sadad e-payments: UTAUT combined with religiosity as moderator. International Journal of E-Business Research, 15(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEBR.2019010104
Thomas, C. G. (2021). Research methodology and scientific writing. In Research Methodology and Scientific Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64865-7
Usman, H. (2016). Islamic religiosity scale, and its applied on the relationship between religiosity and selection of Islamic bank. Journal of Distribution Science, 14(2), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.15722/JDS.14.2.201602.23
Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). Theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 36(1), 157–178.
https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Yousaf, S., & Malik, M. S. (2013). Evaluating the influences of religiosity and product involvement level on the consumers. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 4(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1108/17590831311329296
Zhou, T., Lu, Y., & Wang, B. (2010). Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 760–767.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.013
