Digital transformation has become concern for various organization, including universities worldwide. These processes require a well identification on critical issues that universities encounter to attain a successful digital transformation. This study aims to identify the critical issues, including the advantages and the challenges arises in Indonesian universities digital transformation processes. This research was conducted using PRISMA approach for systematic literature review framework. The citation and co-authorship analysis were conducted for the selected sample articles from the Dimension journal database. Finally, this research use the annotated bibliography to identify the issues on digital transformation processes from the universities stakeholder’s perspective, especially managers of higher education institutions during 2018 to 2023. This research found 79 articles for the initial analysis. From the co-authorship analysis, we found 4 articles which conform our research context. The annotated bibliography found the critical use of the framework which identify several priority issues in universities digital transformation processes, namely contextual, technical, and cultural issues. The critical use of digital transformation framework would be beneficial in responding obstacles during the transformation processes. This research suggest the empirical examination on using the framework for universities digital transformation readiness. The empirical evidence would generate opportunities for further framework improvement.
Bond, M., Marin, V. I., Dolch, C., Bedenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2018). Digital transformation in German higher education: student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1
Butler, D., Leahy, M., Twining, P., Akoh, B., Chtouki, Y., Farshadnia, S., Moore, K., Nikolov, R., Pascual, C., Sherman, B., & Valtonen, T. (2018). Education Systems in the Digital Age: The Need for Alignment. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(3), 473–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9388-6
Campbell, D. J. (1988). Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis. The Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.2307/258353
Chipembele, M., & Bwalya, K. J. (2016). Assessing e-readiness of the Copperbelt University, Zambia: case study. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 33(5), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijilt-12-2015-0036
Choirunnisa, U., Rijanta, R., & Rachmawati, R. (2021). Digital transformation readiness: How ‘Sonjo Pangan’ movement assists SMEs’ product distributions during COVID-19 Pandemic. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 916(1), 12025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/916/1/012025
Geczy, A., Krammer, O., & Sujbert, L. (2023). Higher Education with Distance Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic - a Transitional Semester from the Viewpoint of Teachers. 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1109/siitme50350.2020.9292179
Granito, F. (2022). Digital Transformation Demystified. https://doi.org/10.1142/12969
Gregory, M. S.-J., & Lodge, J. M. (2015). Academic workload: the silent barrier to the implementation of technology-enhanced learning strategies in higher education. Distance Education, 36(2), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1055056
Kalolo, J. F. (2018). Digital revolution and its impact on education systems in developing countries. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9778-3
Kaminskyi, O. Y., Yereshko, Y. O., & Kyrychenko, S. O. (2018). DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF UNIVERSITY EDUCATION IN UKRAINE: TRAJECTORIES OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE CONDITIONS OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC ORDER. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 64(2), 128. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v64i2.2083
Kerroum, K., Khiat, A., Bahnasse, A., Aoula, E.-S., & khiat, Y. (2020). The proposal of an agile model for the digital transformation of the University Hassan II of Casablanca 4.0. Procedia Computer Science, 175, 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.07.057
Kim, H. J., Hong, A. J., & Song, H.-D. (2019). The roles of academic engagement and digital readiness in students’ achievements in university e-learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0152-3
Kuzu, O. H. (2020). Digital Transformation in Higher Education: A Case Study on Strategic Plans. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia, 29(3), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-29-3-9-23
Limani, Y., Hajrizi, E., Stapleton, L., & Retkoceri, M. (2019). Digital Transformation Readiness in Higher Education Institutions (HEI): The Case of Kosovo. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(25), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.445
Littig, B., & Pöchhacker, F. (2014). Socio-Translational Collaboration in Qualitative Inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(9), 1085–1095. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414543696
Looi, C.-K., Chan, S.-W., & Wu, L. (2023). Crisis and Opportunity: Transforming Teachers From Curriculum Deliverers to Designers of Learning (pp. 131–145). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7869-4_9
Marks, A., AL-Ali, M., Atassi, R., Elkishk, A. A., & Rezgui, Y. (2023). Digital Transformation in Higher Education: Maturity and Challenges Post COVID-19 (pp. 53–70). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68285-9_6
Matt, C., Hess, T., & Benlian, A. (2015). Digital Transformation Strategies. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57(5), 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5
Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012
Onuka, A. O. U. (2023). African Higher Education Transformation for Quality Outcome (pp. 3–24). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-902-7_1
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., & Niehaves, B. (2018). Design science research genres: introduction to the special issue on exemplars and criteria for applicable design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(2), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085x.2018.1458066
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.2753/mis0742-1222240302
Pirkkalainen, H., & Pawlowski, J. M. (2014). Global social knowledge management – Understanding barriers for global workers utilizing social software. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 637–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.041
Rafiq, M., Batool, S. H., Ali, A. F., & Ullah, M. (2021). University libraries response to COVID-19 pandemic: A developing country perspective. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(1), 102280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102280
Reid, P. (2012). Categories for barriers to adoption of instructional technologies. Education and Information Technologies, 19(2), 383–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9222-z
Scholkmann, A. B. (2023). Resistance to (Digital) Change (pp. 219–236). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55878-9_13
Shelton, C. (2016). Giving up technology and social media: why university lecturers stop using technology in teaching. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(3), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2016.1217269
Sinclair, J., & Aho, A.-M. (2017). Experts on super innovators: understanding staff adoption of learning management systems. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1342609
Tan, T., Chen, K., Xue, F., & Lu, W. (2019). Barriers to Building Information Modeling (BIM) implementation in China’s prefabricated construction: An interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 219, 949–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.141
Watty, K., McKay, J., & Ngo, L. (2016). Innovators or inhibitors? Accounting faculty resistance to new educational technologies in higher education. Journal of Accounting Education, 36, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2016.03.003
