This research paper analyses the convention underpinning delimitation of Malaysia-Indonesia maritime boundaries. The study analyses international legal frameworks and customary international law, and their application to maritime boundary disputes. The research reveals that 1982 UNCLOS provides general principles and guidelines for delimitating maritime boundaries but does not offer a definitive solution to the complex disputes between states. The research concludes that delimiting maritime boundaries between Malaysia and Indonesia requires a comprehensive and context-specific approach considering legal, historical, and equitable considerations. The study recommends that Malaysia and Indonesia engage in a constructive and cooperative dialogue based on mutual respect, good faith, and pacifistic settlement of disputes. The study also highlights the significance of supporting the rule of law and obeying international law principles in fostering regional political stability. The normative juridical method of research provides a valuable contribution to understanding the legal principles governing the delimitation of maritime boundaries. It offers practical recommendations for resolving disputes between Malaysia and Indonesia in a manner that upholds international law and promotes regional cooperation.
Hamzah, B. A. (2018). Maritime boundary issues: Time for closure. New Straits Times.
Barbados v Trinidad and Tobago, Award, (2006) 45 ILM 839.
Bay of Bengal Maritime Boundary Arbitration between Bangladesh and India, Bangladesh v India, Final Award, ICGJ 479 (PCA 2014).
Bernard, L. (2012). Whose Side Is It On? – The Boundaries Dispute in the North Malacca Strait. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 9(3), 2. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol9.3.352
Boggs, S. (1930). Delimitation of the territorial sea: the method of delimitation proposed by the delegation of the United States at the Hague Conference for the Codification of International Law. American Journal of International Law, 24(3), 541–555.
Certain Activities carried out by Nicaragua in the Border Area, Costa Rica v Nicaragua, Compensation owed by Nicaragua to Costa Rica, ICJ GL No 150, [2018] ICJ Rep 15.
Charney, J. I. (1994). Progress in international maritime boundary delimitation law. American Journal of International Law, 88(2), 227–256.
Continental Shelf, Libya v Malta, Merits, Judgment, [1985] ICJ Rep 13.
Continental Shelf (Tunis. v. Libya), 1982 ICJ 18.
Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area, Canada v United States, Appointment of Expert, Order, [1984] ICJ Rep 165.
Guyana v Suriname, Award, ICGJ 370 (PCA 2007).
Hamzah, B. A., Forbes, V. L., Jalil, J. A., & Basiron, M. N. (2014). The maritime boundaries of Malaysia and Indonesia in the Malacca Strait: An appraisal. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, 6(4), 207–226.
https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2014.956856
ILM. (1970). Indonesia-Malaysia: Agreement on Continental Shelf Boundaries 1969. International Legal Material, 9(6), 1173–1176. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20690688
Jacovides, A. J. (1979). Three aspects of the law of the sea: Islands, delimitation and dispute settlement. Marine Policy, 3(4), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-597X(79)90018-6
Koh, T. T., & Jayakumar, S. (1985). The Negotiating Process of the 3rd UN Conference on the Law of the Sea. In M. H. Nordquist (Ed.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982: A Commentary, (Vol. 1). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Lando, M. (2017). Judicial uncertainties concerning territorial sea delimitation under Article 15 of the UNCLOS. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 66(3), 589–623. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589317000197
Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain, Qatar v Bahrain, [1994] ICJ Rep 112.
Maritime Delimitation in the Area between Greenland and Jan Mayen, Denmark v Norway, Judgment, Merits, [1993] ICJ Rep 38.
Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea, Romania v Ukraine, Judgment, ICJ GL No 132, [2009] ICJ Rep 61.
Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya). Retrieved March 17 2023, from https://www.icj-cij.org/case/161
Maritime Dispute, Peru v Chile, Judgment, ICJ GL No 137, [2014] ICJ Rep 4.
Mark J, V. (1991). Malaysia and the law of the sea, the Foreign Policy, the Issues and their Implications. In Institute of Strategic and International Studies. Institute of Strategic and International Studies.
Nordquist, M. H., Grandy, N. R., Nandan, S. N., & Rosenne, S. (1993). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982: A Commentary: Vol. II. Brill Nijhoff.
North Sea Continental Shelf, Germany v Denmark, Order, [1968] ICJ Rep 9.
Osthagen, A. (2021). Troubled seas? The changing politics of maritime boundary disputes. Ocean and Coastal Management, 205.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OCECOAMAN.2021.105535
Prescott, V. (1996). Indonesia's maritime claims and outstanding delimitation problems. IBRU Boundary e Security Bulletin, 3(4), 91–97.
Salleh, A., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Malaysia's policy towards its 1963-2008 territorial disputes . Journal of Law and Conflict Resolution, 1(5), 107–2009.
Schofield, C. (2021). Options for Overcoming Overlapping Maritime Claims: Developments in Maritime Boundary Dispute Resolution and Managing Disputed Waters. Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies, 8(2), 21–41.
Schofield, C., & Storey, I. (2005). Energy security and Southeast Asia: the impact on maritime boundary and territorial disputes. Havard Asia Quarterly, 9(4), 36.
Sein, A. G. H. K. M. (2019). Refining the Maritime Boundary Delimitation Methodology: The Search for Predictability and Certainty. IIUM Law Journal, 27(1), 35–61.
Sovereignty over Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan, Indonesia v Malaysia, Judgment, Merits, [2002] ICJ Rep 625.
Supancana, I. B. R. (2022). Maritime Boundary Disputes Between Indonesia and Malaysia in the Area of Ambalat Block: Some Optional Scenarios for Peaceful Settlement. ASEAN International Law, 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3195-5_16
Territorial and Maritime Dispute, Nicaragua v Colombia, Judgment, ICJ GL No 124.
Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea, Nicaragua v Honduras, Judgment, ICJ GL No 120.
