This paper sought to explore the Aristotelian appeal of emotions (Pathos) based on the writers’ emotive discursivity of writing through their rhetorical use of move structures in organising the content of their research abstract. It is referred to as the TPS move structure which represents the Territory (T), Problem (P), and Solution (S) moves. A total of 480 academic research abstracts (ARAs) of indexed journals from the outer circle of Malaysian Non-native English writers (MNNEWs) and the inner circle of Native English writers (MNNEWs). An NVivo12 software application was used in this study to analyse the frequency of the writers’ different types of TPS move structures. It was found that both groups would prefer the non-linear TPS type (non-TPS) of move structures by organising their research ideas through PTS or TPTS structures. These non-TPS structures were discursive, non-linear, and repetitive which reflect the oriental way of writing in trying to appeal to the readers’ emotional minds. Despite all writers’ less usage of TPS structure in showing their linearity and directness, further analysis showed the Malaysian English writers would be more linear and direct than the native English writers. In doing so, Malaysian English writers would be more likely to omit the move related to the problem statement, demonstrating their less emphasis on the research gap. Further research could be conducted to explore the reasons for the writers’ lack of Anglo-European direct writing style in academic research abstracts.
Amnuai, W., & Wannaruk, A. (2012). Investigating move structure of English applied linguistics research article discussions published in international and Thai journals. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 1.
Aristotle & Kennedy, G. A. (1991). Aristotle on Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
Asadi, J. (2022). A Genre study of Cross-gender and Cross-cultural variations in IELTS Essays. Journal of New Trends in English Language Learning, 1(4), 35-50.
Berhan, N., & Hamid, Z. (2012). Retorik Gaya Dalam Membentuk Karakter Bangsa. Jurnal Linguistik, 15 (1), 1-16.
Bunton, D. (2002). Generic moves in Ph. D. Introduction: chapters. Academic Discourse. London: Longman, 57-75.
Carrell, P. L. (1984). The Effects of Rhetorical Organisation on ESL Readers. TESOL Quarterly, 18(3), 441.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.
Franzosi, R., Doyle, S., McClelland, L. E., Rankin, C. P., & Vicari, S. (2013). Quantitative narrative analysis software options compared: PC-ACE and CAQDAS (ATLAS. ti, MAXqda, and NVivo). Quality & Quantity, 47(6), 3219-3247.
Hoey, M. (1983). On the surface of discourse. London: Allen & Unwin.
Jalilifar, A. (2010). Research article introductions: sub-disciplinary variations in Applied Linguistics. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 2(2), 29-55.
Jiang, Z. Z., & Shao, C. Z. (2006). Markedness in Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition. Online Submission, 3(8), 77-79.
Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning 16, 1-20.
Khaw, L. L. (2020, April). Problem-Solution Patterns in the Introductions of Chemical Engineering Research Articles: Pedagogical Insights. In 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 78-84). IEEE.
Kinneavy, J. L. (1971). A theory of discourse. Eaglewoods Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lehman, I. M., & Su?kowski, ?. (2020). Representation of voice in English essays of non-native students of business. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-14.
Lewins, A., & Silver, C. (2007). Using software in qualitative research: A step-by-step guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mahzari, A., & Maftoon, P. (2007). A contrastive study of the introduction section of English and Persian medical research articles. Iranian Journal of Language Studies (IJLS), 1(3), 201-214.
Mohamad, H. A. (2022). Analysis of Rhetorical Appeals to Logos, Ethos and Pathos in ENL and ESL Research Abstracts. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(3), e001314. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i3.1314
Mohamad, H. A. (2023). A Contrastive Analysis of Lexical Richness in The Rhetoric of English as A Native Language (ENL) And English As A Second Language (ESL) Research Abstracts [Doctoral Dissertation, International Islamic University Malaysia].
Mohamad, H. A., Mohaini, M. L., & Nath, P. R. (2020). An Analysis of Lexical Chunks in Online Business Letters (OBL) and Business Letter Corpus (BLC): A Corpus-Based Study. International Journal of Modern Languages and Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 63-83.
Mohamad, H. A., Pilus, Z., Mohaini, M. L., Zolkapli, R. M., & Wahab, N. A. (2022). Rhetorical strategies for appeal to logos in research abstracts: an analysis of rhetoric. Muallim Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1-15.
Mohamad, H. A., Pilus, Zolkapli, R. M., Mohaini, M. L., Wahab, N. A. & Nath, P. R. (2023). The rhetorical density of authorial emotiveness and voice passiveness in abstract compositions. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 13 (2), 61-77.
Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. (2014). Create a research space (CARS) model of research introductions. Writing about writing: A college reader, 12-15.
Williamson, P. (2021). Planning a Discursive Essay. Academic Writing Skills.
Winter, E. O. (1976). The Fundamentals of Information Structure: A Pilot Manual for Further. Hatfield Polytechnic.
Zolkapli, R. B. M., Mohamad, H. A., Mohaini, M. L., Wahab, N. H. A., & Nath, P. R. (2022). Code-Switching and Code-Mixing in the Practice of Judgement Writing in Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 30(3)
