International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

A Conceptual Analysis on the Antecedents of Intention to Enroll Online Courses: The Integration of TAM and TPB

Open access
This paper aims to impart a conceptual analysis of the relationship between perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived behavioral control, and digital literacy with the intention to enroll online courses among undergraduate students in Malaysia. Additionally, the mediating effects of attitude on the relationship between the independent and dependent variables are also tested in this study. The proposed theoretical framework in this conceptual paper is guided by the integration of TAM and TPB. Theoretically, this study provides an integrative model that influence the intention to enroll online courses driven by the extension of TAM and TPB. This study extents the literature on online courses enrollment from the perspectives of developing countries, generally, and Malaysia, particularly through identifying the contextual factors and their effects on the intention to enroll online courses among undergraduate students. Finally, this study provides an empirical model that guides higher education institutions on understanding the factors that influence the undergraduate students’ intention to enroll in the online courses.
Aboagye, E., Oduro, G. K. T., Kankam, A., Appiah, J., & Adjei, K. B. (2020). The challenges and benefits of online education during and after COVID-19. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7(1), 18-25.
Abou, S. S., Koronfol, M. A., & El-Tawil, M. A. (2014). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. Canadian Journal on Multimedia and Wireless Networks, 5(1), 1-12.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888-918.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-683.
Al-Ammary, J. H., Mohamad, S., & Ahmad, S. N. S. (2014). Measuring the effect of perceived e-learning usefulness and ease use on students’ satisfaction. International Education Studies, 7(4), 95-105.
Alfadda, H., & Mahdi, O. S. (2021). Examining technology acceptance and perceptions: A study of a learning management system in the Gulf Cooperation Council. Computers in Human Behavior, 118, 106686.
Alharbi, A., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the Technology Acceptance Model in understanding academics’ behavioural intention to use learning management systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1), 143-155.
Ali, S., Uddin, S. M., & Shaheen, R. (2020). Online education in Pakistan during the COVID-19 pandemic: Impact, challenges and strategies. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 7(2), 91-112.
Alqahtani, M., & Rajpoot, Q. (2021). Understanding students’ intentions to enrol in online courses: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 1-19.
Al-Qaysi, A. H., Al-Khafaji, Z. M., Al-Janabi, H. H., & Al-Qaysi, A. R. (2021). Predicting learners’ intention to enroll in online courses: A study from Iraq. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1635-1652. doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10467-4.
Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Alias, N. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on students’ attitudes and intentions towards e-learning in Saudi Arabia. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3263-3283.
Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2015). An empirical investigation of mobile learning acceptance and its impact on students' learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 419-427.
Anwar, K., & Adnan, A. (2020). Higher education in the time of Covid-19 pandemic: A review of the emerging literature. Online Learning Journal, 24(2), 6-22.
Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i-vi. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3750970
Budiyanto, B., Cahyono, E., Handayani, D., & Aditya, I. (2019). Factors influencing students’ intention to enrol in online courses. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 12(1), 55-66.
Chang, Y., Hsiao, W., & Chen, Y. (2017). An empirical study on the factors affecting mobile learning acceptance among medical college students. Journal of Medical Systems, 41(5), 1-9.
Chen, K. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2021). The impact of digital literacy on online learning: A moderated mediation model. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(3), 399-413.
Chen, C., & Li, M. (2020). Exploring factors influencing college students’ intention to enrol in MOOCs: An extended UTAUT model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(8), 1445-1464.
Chen, Y., & Teng, C. I. (2020). Exploring factors affecting students’ attitudes and behavioral intentions towards using learning management systems: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(6), 1386-1408.
Coman, A., Buiga, A., & Chis, A. E. (2020). Evaluating the acceptance of technology-enhanced learning: A review of theoretical frameworks and approaches. Sustainability, 12(17), 6993.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
DeSantis, A. D., & Ugianskis, J. P. (2020). Exploring the antecedents of college students’ intention to enroll in online courses: A blended technology acceptance model approach. Computers & Education, 149, 1-14.
Ebrahim, S. (2020). Covid-19: The impact of a global crisis on tourism and hospitality. Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management, 8(2), 53-55. doi: 10.15640/jthm.v8n2a7
Hart, C., Friedmann, E., & Hill, B. (2019). Benefits and Challenges of Online Learning. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1608726.
Huang, R., & Wang, D. (2019). The effects of perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness on intention to use e-learning in marine engineering college. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 12(1), 1–16.
Huang, R., Chen, Y., & Huang, G. (2021). Investigating the effects of perceived instructor support on students’ intention to enrol in online courses: An extended TAM approach. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-18.
Joosten, T., & Cusatis, R. (2020). Online learning: a practical guide. Routledge.
Keshavarz, S., & Zarei, B. (2021). Factors influencing students’ intention to enroll in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) based on the theory of planned behavior. Distance Education, 42(2), 299-314.
Khan, M. R., Islam, M. M., Islam, M. S., & Noor, M. N. M. (2021). Online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: The role of technology acceptance model (TAM) and prior experience. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 5817-5841.
Lee, J.-C., & Chen, I.-C. (2021). Exploring the impact of perceived usefulness and self-regulated learning on college students’ attitude toward online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 2151-2171.
Liang, J. C., & Huang, J. H. (2021). The effects of digital literacy on online learning readiness: A study of undergraduate students. Computers & Education, 159, 104026.
Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2013). Perceived characteristics, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on behavioral intention to use e-learning in organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1483-1490.
Lin, C. H., Chen, Y. C., & Huang, C. Y. (2021). Investigating the effects of online learning systems on students’ perceived ease of use, attitude, and intention to use: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 162, 104174. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104174
Marinoni, G., Van’t Land, H., & Jensen, T. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 on higher education around the world: IAU global survey report. International Association of Universities.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2020). Distance Learning Dataset Training: Enrollment. https://nces.ed.gov/datalab/
Perloff, R. M. (2003). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st century. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. John Wiley & Sons.
Qaysi, S. N., Al-Momani, T. M., Al-Emran, M., & Shaalan, K. (2018). Technology acceptance model in education: A review of the literature. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(19), 54-63.
Quinn, J. (2020). Covid-19: The impact on higher education. UNESCO. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/news/covid-19-impact-higher-education
Ray, S. (2020). The potential of online courses in achieving sustainable development goals. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(16), 18-25.
Ray, M. L. (1973). Conative psychology and marketing management: A theoretical framework for research. Journal of Marketing, 37(4), 44-49.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster.
Seo, H., & Lee, K. (2020). Exploring the relationship between online learning system usability and students’ attitudes and intentions to use. Educational Technology & Society, 23(3), 36–48.
Suresh, S., De Costa, S., & Kumar, A. (2018). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived enjoyment as drivers for the user acceptance of e-learning in emergency medicine. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 15, 20.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision sciences, 39(2), 273-315.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
Wu, J. H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T. L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155-164. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012
Wu, T. T., Huang, Y. M., & Huang, T. C. (2020). The relationship between digital literacy and academic performance in online learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 31, 100339.
Yusuf, M. O., & Banawi, I. A. (2013). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(3), 235-245.
Zhou, T., & Lu, Y. (2011). Examining mobile payment user adoption from the perspectives of UTAUT and flow. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 883-896.
Zhu, C., Guan, B., Chen, X., & Yan, W. (2021). Factors affecting university students’ intention to use mobile learning: A perspective of the extended technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 3975-3996.