International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Rhetorical Appeals Used by The New Generation of Malaysian Politicians in Their Social Media Communication

Open access
This study was conducted to investigate the rhetorical appeals used by the new generation of Malaysian politicians in their social media communication. Drawing on Aristotle’s rhetorical appeal theory, two (2) research questions were posited: (a) What were the different communicative practices used in the media posts of the selected new generation of Malaysian politicians? and (b) Which type of rhetorical appeals was most commonly used among the selected politicians? The data for the study were collected from the target politicians’ social media platforms related to the Taman Sri Muda flood crisis dated from the 17th of December 2021 to the 10th of January 2022. This study revolved around five (5) politicians categorised as the new generation of Malaysian politicians: Syed Saddiq [P1], Hannah Yeoh [P2], Fahmi Fadzil [P3], Amirudin Shari [P4], and Kasthuri Patto [P5]. The data were analysed thematically and classified based on Aristotle’s rhetorical appeals of ethos, pathos and logos. Eight (8) sub-themes emerged from the data analysis. It was found that each politician had utilised different communicative practices depending on the objectives of his or her appeals. However, the highest number of rhetorical appeals used among all the politicians combined, was logos. This study contributes to the literature on social media and politics related to persuasive strategies used by politicians and political communication.
Bronstein, J., Aharony, N., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2018). Politicians’ use of Facebook during elections. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(5), 551–572.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-03-2018-0067
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Cockcroft, R., Cockcroft, S., & Hamilton, C. (2014). Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric (3rd ed.). Red Globe Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22254-4
Enli, G. (2017). Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. European Journal of Communication, 32(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116682802
Fanani, A., Setiawan, S., Purwati, O., Maisarah, M., & Qoyyimah, U. (2020). Donald Trump’s grammar of persuasion in his speech. Heliyon, 6(1), e03082.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03082
Hudders, L., de Jans, S., & de Veirman, M. (2020). The commercialization of social media stars: a literature review and conceptual framework on the strategic use of social media influencers. International Journal of Advertising, 40(3), 327–375.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.1836925
Isai, K. I. A., Lin, T. M., Ching, H. S., Selvajothi, R., & Maruthai, E. (2020). Using Rhetorical Approach of Ethos, Pathos and Logos by Malaysian Engineering Students in Persuasive Email Writings. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(4), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i4.386
Kamaruddin, N., & Rogers, R. A. (2020). Malaysia’s democratic and political transformation. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 47(2), 126–148.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.2020.1715046
Kelm, O. (2020). Why do politicians use Facebook and Twitter the way they do? The influence of perceived audience expectations. Studies in Communication and Media, 9(1), 8–34. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2020-1-8
La Torre, M., Dumay, J., Rea, M. A., & Abhayawansa, S. (2020). A journey towards a safe harbour: The rhetorical process of the International Integrated Reporting Council. The British Accounting Review, 52(2), 100836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.100836
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. J. (2012). The Social Dynamics of Trust: Theoretical and Empirical Research, 1985–2012. Social Forces, 91(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sos116
Meel, P., & Vishwakarma, D. K. (2020). Fake news, rumor, information pollution in social media and web: A contemporary survey of state-of-the-arts, challenges and opportunities. Expert Systems with Applications, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112986
Mshvenieradze, T. (2013). Logos Ethos and Pathos in Political Discourse. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(11), 1939-1945. doi:10.4304/tpls.3.11.1939-1945
Hill, O. J. H. (2019). Logos, ethos, pathos and the marketing of higher education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 30(1), 87–104.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2019.1683120
Olsen, J. P. (2018). The Bergen approach to public administration and political organization. Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift, 34(4), 188–206.
https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-2936-2018-04-03
Pew Research Center. (2020). 1. The congressional social media landscape. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Retrieved 1 February 2022, from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/07/16/1-the-congressional-social-media-landscape/
Romanova, I. D., & Smirnova, I. V. (2019). Persuasive techniques in advertising. TrainingLanguage and Culture, 3(2), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.29366/2019tlc.3.2.4
Rossini, P., Hemsley, J., Tanupabrungsun, S., Zhang, F., & Stromer-Galley, J. (2018). Social Media, Opinion Polls, and the Use of Persuasive Messages During the 2016 US Election Primaries. Social Media + Society, 4(3), 205630511878477.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118784774
Saaty, A. (2020). The Rhetoric of Twitter in Terms of the Aristotelian Appeals (Logos, Ethos, and Pathos) in ESL/EFL Educational Settings. English Language Teaching, 13(5), 115. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n5p115Bronstein et al. (2018)
Saylors, R. (2019). Fighting Hate through Entrepreneurial Storytelling by Using Whitehead’s Process Theory. The Emerald Handbook of Management and Organization Inquiry, 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-551-120191009
Statista. (2021). Social media users as a percentage of the total population Malaysia 2021. Retrieved November 25, 2021, from
https://www.statista.com/statistics/883712/malaysia-social-media-penetration/
Stier, S., Bleier, A., Lietz, H., & Strohmaier, M. (2018). Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians, Audiences, and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter. Political Communication, 35(1), 50–74.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334728
Stucki, I., Pleger, L. E., & Sager, F. (2018). The Making of the Informed Voter: A Split-Ballot Survey on the Use of Scientific Evidence in Direct-Democratic Campaigns. Swiss Political Science Review, 24(2), 115–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12290
Stucki, I., & Sager, F. (2018). Aristotelian framing: logos, ethos, pathos and the use of evidence in policy frames. Policy Sciences, 51(3), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9322-8
Swani, K., & Milne, G. R. (2017). Evaluating Facebook brand content popularity for service versus goods offerings. Journal of Business Research, 79, 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.06.003
Towler, C. C., Crawford, N. N., & Bennett, R. A. (2019). Shut Up and Play: Black Athletes, Protest Politics, and Black Political Action. Perspectives on Politics, 18(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592719002597
Varpio, L. (2018). Using rhetorical appeals to credibility, logic, and emotions to increase your persuasiveness. Perspectives on Medical Education, 7(3), 207–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0420-2
Yoo, S. W., & Gil De Zuniga, H. (2019). The role of heterogeneous political discussion and partisanship on the effects of incidental news exposure online. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 16(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2018.1561346
Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, M., B. (2009). Qualitative Analysis of Content, In: B. M. Wildemuth, Ed., Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science. pp. 1-12 Libraries Unlimited.
Zummo, L., Gargroetzi, E., & Garcia, A. (2020). Youth voice on climate change: using factor analysis to understand the intersection of science, politics, and emotion. Environmental Education Research, 26(8), 1207–1226.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1771288