This study aims on the integration of design thinking in the teaching practice of secondary vocational education, which requires the upgrading of clear talent training objectives, the optimization of systemic curriculum structure and the innovation of design thinking. In this research, we use face-to-face interview and observation methods to study 46 students' participation in the art and design training. The students study in Shaoguan Technician College, Guangzhou Province, China. We find that students gradually explore and realize their limitations according to the set of given tasks. In addition, participants prefer to choose contents that they are interested in or familiar with when given project topics. We also discover that students who are not very serious in class would be focused when they meet the contents that they were interested in. The results show that design thinking improve students’ imagination, analytical ability, understanding ability and observation ability.
Avsec, S. (2023). Design thinking to envision more sustainable technology-enhanced teaching for effective knowledge transfer. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1163
Dam, R., & Siang, T. (2021). What is design thinking and why is it so popular? Interaction Design Foundation. Retrieved from
https://athena.ecs.csus.edu/~buckley/CSc170_F2018_files/What%20is%20Design%20Thinking%20and%20Why%20Is%20It%20So%20Popular.
Liedtka, J. (2018). Why design thinking works. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2018/09/why-design-thinking-works.
Chasanidou, D., Gasparini, A. A., Lee, E. (2015). Design Thinking Methods and Tools for Innovation. In: Marcus, A. (eds) Design, User Experience, and Usability: Design Discourse. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9186. Springer, Cham. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20886-2_2
Belen, C. M., Teresa, B., Roberto, C., & Belen, D. (2023). Making design thinking for education sustainable: Training preservice teachers to address practice challenges. Thinking Skills and Creativity. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101199.
Achtenhagen, F. A. (2001) Criteria for the development of complex teaching-learning environments Instructional Science, 29 (4-5) (2001), pp. 361-380
Todd, R., Magleby, S. (2004). Evaluation and rewards for faculty involved in engineering design education. International Journal of Engineering, pp.333–340.
Suwa, M., Gero, J., Purcell, T. (2000). Unexpected discoveries and s-invention of design requirements: Important vehicles for a design process. Design Studies, 21, pp.539–567.
