The basic concept of the Theory of Utilitarianism in general is very simple, such as how to maximize the utility of an action, so that from this process we can enjoy benefits, advantages, pleasure, good, or happiness. The research method used in this research is library research. By considering these various perspectives, utilitarianism can assist in understanding the moral consequences of a legal policy and maximizing the benefit or happiness for as many people as possible. The conclusion of this article is that in the concept of utilitarianism, the main goal is not how actions or events are used to achieve benefits, but to calculate whether those actions or events have benefits.
Duignan, B. (n.d.). "Utilitarianism." Britannica.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/utilitarianismphilosophy.
Kolosov, I. V., Sigalov, K. E. (2020). "Was J. Bentham the First Legal Utilitarian?" RUDN Journal of Law 24, no. 2 (2020): 438–71. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2020-24-2-438-471.
Pratiwi, E., Negoro, T., & Haykal, H. (2022). "Teori Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham: Tujuan Hukum Atau Metode Pengujian Produk Hukum?" Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(2), 268-293.
Bentham, J. (2001). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Ontario: Batoche Books Kitchener, 2001.
Kolosov, I., Sigalov, K. (2020). "Epistemological Foundations of Early Legal Utilitarianism." Wisdom 14, no. 1 (24 Maret 2020): 31–44.
https://doi.org/10.24234/WISDOM.V14I1.302.
Pranayaditnya, A. (n.d.) "Tren Pembelian Mobil di Masa Pandemi, Lebih Banyak Cash atau Kredit?" Otosia.com. Diakses pada 4 Mei 2023. https://www.otosia.com/berita/tren-pembelian-mobil-di-masapandemi-lebih-banyak-cash-atau-kredit.html.
Asshiddiqie, J., Ridwan, S. (2017). Teori Hans Kelsen. Ali, Mahrus. "Pemetaan Tesis dalam Aliran-Aliran Filsafat Hukum dan Konsekuensi Metodologisnya." Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 24, no. 2 (15 April 2017): 213–31. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss2.art3.
Schofield, P. (2003). "Jeremy Bentham, the Principle of Utility, and Legal Positivism." Current Legal Problems 56, no. 1 (2003): 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/56.1.1.
