In the context of the digital area, online engagement is essential to the connectivism framework. Connectivism, a term coined by George Siemens, offers a framework for comprehending how learning takes place in networked environments while also recognising the special opportunities and difficulties given by the digital age. Learners take an active part in online discussions, interact with multimedia contents, work together with peers, and produce and disseminate their own knowledge. This quantitative research study was conducted to explore perceptions of learners on online engagement which contains four elements: connectedness, diversity, openness and autonomy. This study was conducted on 129 students from Centre of Foundation Studies, UiTM Kampus Dengkil who undergo the process of online learning. A valid and reliable questionnaire was used to gather the data. It consists of four sections, demographic information and questions regarding learner-to-learner interaction, learner-to-instructor interaction and learner-to-content interaction. The findings indicated that most of the students gave positive perceptions on the engagement strategies with the learner-to-instructor being the most valued among the three. In addition, there is a strong positive correlation observed between the four elements that were documented. The results of the study have implications for students’ online engagement, motivation, academic performance and adaptability to future learning environments.
Ana, A., Minghat, A. D., Purnawarman, P., Saripudin, S., Muktiarni, M., Dwiyanti, V., & Mustakim, S. S. (2020). Students' Perceptions of the Twists and Turns of E-learning in the Midst of the Covid 19 Outbreak. Romanian Journal for Multidimensional Education/Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12.
Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., & Del Rosario, L. S. (2021). Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines. Education and information technologies, 26(6), 7321-7338.
Bolliger, D. U., & Martindale, T. (2004). Key factors influencing student satisfaction with online courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 61–67.
Downes, S. (2005). An introduction to connective knowledge. Stephen’s Web.
http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bib/page.cgi?post=33034
Downes, S. (2006). Learning Networks and Connective Knowledge. Retrieved from
http://itforum.coe.uga.edu/paper92/paper92.htlm
Downes, S. (2012) Connectivism and Connective Knowledge. Essays on Meaning and learning networksRetrieved from https://www.downes.ca/files/books/Connective_Knowledge-19May2012.pdf
Farrell, O., & Brunton, J. (2020). A balancing act: a window into online student engagement experiences. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-19.
Goldie, J. G. S. (2016) Connectivism: a knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher, 38(10), pp. 1064-1069. (doi:10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173661)
Herwiana, S., & Laili, E. N. (2022). Exploring Benefits and Obstacles of Online Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic in EFL Students' Experiences. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 14(1), 61-72.
Jackson, S. L. (2015) Research methods and Statistics-A Critical Thinking Approach (5tH Edition) Boston, USA:: Cengage Learning.
Jaradat, S., & Ajlouni, A. (2021). Undergraduates’ perspectives and challenges of online learning during the covid-19 pandemic: A case from the University of Jordan. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 12(1), 149-173.
Maqableh, M., & Alia, M. (2021). Evaluation online learning of undergraduate students under lockdown amidst COVID-19 Pandemic: The online learning experience and students’ satisfaction. Children and Youth Services Review, 128, 106160.
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D.U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning 22(1), 205- 222. doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
Nazilah, A. (2021). Counselling students’ perception of online learning during COVID-19 in Malaysia. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 19(4), pp282-295.
Paudyal, G. R., & Rana, K. (2021). How University Lecturers and Students Interpret Opportunities and Challenges of Online Mode of Learning. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 7(4), 1006-1022.
Rahmat, N. H. (2022) Exploring Task Environment for Online Academic Writing: The Case fo Coloured Scaffolds. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Vp 12 (3), pp 694-707. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i3/12928
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 2(1). Retrieved from
http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
Thandevaraj, E. J., Gani, N. A. N., & Nasir, M. K. M. (2021). A review of psychological impact on students online learning during covid-19 in malaysia. Creative Education, 12(6), 1296-1306.
Tschofen, C., & Mackness, J. (2012). Connectivism and dimensions of individual experience. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 124-143.
Utecht, J., & Keller, D. (2019). Becoming Relevant Again: Applying Connectivism Learning Theory to Today's Classrooms. Critical Questions in Education, 10(2), 107-119.
