International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Descriptiveness of Common Bird Names in the Malay Language

Open access
Understanding the level of descriptiveness in common bird names is essential for evaluating the quality of bird names. However, there is currently a scarcity of information regarding the level of descriptiveness for common bird names in the Malay language. Therefore, this study was conducted with two objectives: to identify the descriptiveness of common bird names in the Malay language and to discuss the descriptiveness of common bird names in the Malay language based on Gilreath's approach 1993. This study used document analysis and was conducted according to the Delphi method, involving five experts in bird identification and taxonomy. Finding revealed that there were three distinct levels of descriptiveness for common bird names in the Malay language. The results of this study can serve as an essential reference for assessing the level of descriptiveness of common bird names, particularly in the Malay language.
Davison, G. W., & Yeap, C. A. (2010). A Naturalist's Guide to the Birds of Malaysia and Singapore. John Beaufoy Pub.
DBP. (2020). Kamus Dewan Perdana. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Doskocilova, I. (2014). Semantic Shift in Plant Names. [Thesis]. The University of South Bohemia
Gibbs, D., Barnes, E., & Cox, J. (2001). Pigeons and doves: a guide to the pigeons and doves of the world (Vol. 13). A&C Black.
Gilreath, C. T. (1993). Onometrics: The formal evaluation of terms. ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1166(1), 75-75.
Jeyarajasingam, A., Norhayati, A., Arifin, Y. M., & Ilias, R. (2016). Burung-burung Malaysia: Malaysia Biodiversity Information System (MyBIS). Penerbit UKM.
Koopman, A. (2017). Surname dynamics in avian nomenclature. Nomina Africana: Journal of African Onomastics, 31(2), 141-152.
Lederer, R. J. (2019). The Art of the Bird: The History of Ornithological Art Through Forty Artists. University of Chicago Press.
Mai. T. T. T. (2019).Semantic nuances f vietnamese lexical units and the teaching of these units to foreign students. Journal of Science: Social Sciences and Humanities, 16(7), 168-178.
Mulyanto, D., Iskandar, J., Madani, A., Gunawan, R., & Partasasmita, R. (2020). Folk name and lore of birds from the Sundanese of West Java, Indonesia: An ethno-ornithological survey. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 21(9). 4384-4395.
MyBIS. (2020). Discover by Species. Malaysia Biodiversity Centre: Ministry of Natural Resources, Environment and Climate Change. https://www.mybis.gov.my/one/
Shaw, P. (2016). Three types of zoological common names and their formation-processes. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 15(2), 171-187.
Robson, C. (2020). Field guide to the birds of South-East Asia. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Skrebova, E. G., Martynova, Y. A., & Bokova, M. M. (2022). Systemic and linguistic principles of the analysis of texts of the english-language automobile media discourse in the aspect of the category of descriptiveness. Russian Linguistic Bulletin, 2 (30). 1-4.
Sokcevicova, H. (2015). An Analysis of Compound Plant Names. [Thesis]. The University of South Bohemia
Strange, M. (2000). A photographic guide to the birds of Southeast Asia: including the Philippines and Borneo. Princeton University Press.
Alagappan, S. (2022). The Names of Land, Field, and Soil in Madurai District – A Linguistic Study. Language in India, 22 (12).
Syafitri, H., Franco, F. M., Suhaimi, A. (2022). Folk Plant Names Are Condensed Forms of Traditional Knowledge: Case Study with the Urang Kanekes of Banten, Indonesia. In: Franco, F.M., Knudsen, M., Hassan, N.H. (eds) Case Studies in Biocultural Diversity from Southeast Asia. Asia in Transition, vol 19. Springer, Singapore.
Zornig, P., Stachowski, K., Popescu, I. I., Miangah, T. M., Mohanty, P., Kelih, E., ... & Altmann, G. (2014). Descriptiveness, activity and nominality in formalized text sequences: Studies in Quantitative Linguistics. Lüdenscheid