The study on the regulation of foreign worker influx is of utmost importance as foreign workers have significantly contributed to the economic advancement of Malaysia. The annual increase in the arrival of workers can be attributed to the demand for labour in various sectors, including industry, services, and agriculture. However, the persistent issue of foreign worker shortages stems primarily from challenges in the application process, high employment costs, and the perpetual demand for workers within the industry. To tackle these challenges and reduce reliance on foreign labour, various measures have been implemented to enhance the management of foreign workers. This study aims to explore the strategies employed by developed nations in regulating and managing foreign workers, with a specific emphasis on policy implementation. The research methodology adopts a qualitative approach by collecting data from secondary sources and government reports. Primary references from scholarly books and journals are supplemented with government publications to examine the existing guidelines concerning the entry of foreign workers. The findings reveal that each country has devised its own distinctive approaches and policies for controlling the entry of foreign workers. Some nations exclusively allow the recruitment of skilled workers and provide pathways to naturalization. Conversely, countries such as Korea and Japan initially adopted a closed-door policy towards unskilled foreign workers, but eventually had to adapt due to demand and supply dynamics. This trend is evident in numerous countries, which have had to amend or introduce new programs to regulate the inflow of foreign workers, at times conflicting with their existing migration policies. It can be concluded that governmental policies need to strike a delicate balance between the interests of multiple stakeholders, including the general public, industries, and political factions. In the Malaysian context, foreign workers are recruited for temporary employment and to meet the demands of the domestic labour market. Consequently, this study implies that Malaysia's policies pertaining to the recruitment of foreign workers should strive to establish an improved management system that effectively curtails dependence on foreign labour, while simultaneously reconciling societal interests with economic considerations. Future research endeavours are recommended to scrutinize guidelines for the regulation of foreign worker influx, taking into account the interests of all involved parties, such as employers, the government, and the workers themselves.
Ang, J. W., Murugasu, A., & Wei, C. Y. (2018). Low-skilled foreign workers’ distortions to the economy. Bank Negara Malaysia, March, 10.
https://www.bnm.gov.my/files/publication/ar/en/2017/cp01_001_box.pdf.
Anderson, J. T. (2020). Managing labour migration in Malaysia: foreign workers and the challenges of ‘control’ beyond liberal democracies. Third World Quarterly 0(0), 1–19.
Czaika, M., & De Haas, H. (2013). The effectiveness of immigration policies. Population and Development Review, 39(3), 487–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00613.x.
Czaika, M., & De Haas, H. (2013). The effectiveness of immigration policies. Population and Development Review, 39(3), 487–508.
Hamzah, I. S., and Daud, S. (2018). Implikasi kemasukan pekerja asing di Malaysia: suatu tinjauan awal. Jurnal Sains Insani, 1(1), 69-77.
Hye-kyung, L. (1997). The employment of foreign workers in Korea. International Sociology 12(3), 353–371.
Hollifield, J. F., Orrenius, P. M., Martin, P. L. (2014). Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Jeon, S. C. (2018). Foreign workers in the Korean labour market: current status and policy issues. BIS Paper 100:,209–221.
Jurgens, J., & Jurgens, J. (2001). The legacies of labor recruitment?: The guest worker and green card programs in the Federal Republic of Germany The legacies of labor recruitment?: The guest worker and green card programs in the Federal Republic of Germany. Policy and Society ,29(4), 345–355.
Kementerian Dalam Negeri. (2020). Pengenalan perkhidmatan pengurusan pekerja asing. http://www.moha.gov.my/index.php/ms/pengenalan-perkhidmatan pengurusan-pekerja-asing.
Kassim, A. (1998). Pendatang: negara asal bertanggungjawab (immigrants: home country responsible). Massa September, 28-30.
Ishak, M. M. (2014). Keselamatan negara: isu pekerja asing dan cabaran semasa. Kluster politik, keselamatan dan hal ehwal antarabangsa. Sesi perbincangan meja bulat. keselamatan negara: isu pekerja asing dan cabaran semasa. Anjuran: Kluster Politik, Keselamatan dan Hal Ehwal Antarabangsa, Majlis Profesor Negara (MPN) & Northern Corridor Research Center (NCRC), Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM). Palm Garden Hotel, Putrajaya.
Malaysia Economic Monitor. (2015). Immigrant labour.
https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/753511468197095162/pdf/102131-WP-P158456-Box394822B-PUBLIC-final-for-printing.pdf.
Natter, K. (2018). Rethinking immigration policy theory beyond ‘western liberal democracies.’ Comparative Migration Studies. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0071-9. [14th April 2021].
Nowrasteh, B. A. (2018). Singapore ’ s immigration system?: past, present, and future. CATO working paper. 53,1–33.
Nakache, D., & Kinoshita, P. J. (2010). The Canadian temporary foreign worker program: do short-term economic needs prevail over human rights concerns? IRPP Study 5. www.irpp.org.
Philip, L. (2002). Germany: Managing Migration in the 21st Century. Working Paper CIIP-1.https://escholarship.org/content/qt1gb6j203/qt1gb6j203_noSplash_1e2c54b7273a9ec5074b995cf9bb0fcc.pdf?t=krnog5.
Soon-Beng, C., & Chew, R. (1995). Immigration and foreign labour in Singapore. Asean Economic Bulletin, 12 (2),191–200.
Tham, J. (2015). Temporary migrant labour in Australia?: the 457 visa scheme and challenges for labour regulation Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law, The University of Melbourne. March 2011 Working Paper No . 50.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280011319.
Tungohan, E. (2018). Temporary foreign workers in canada: reconstructing ‘belonging’ and remaking ‘citizenship.’ Social and Legal Studies 27(2), 236–252.
U.S. Congressional Research Service. (2020). H-2A and H-2B Temporary Worker Visas: Policy and Related Issues. Congressional Research Service Reports on Homeland Security. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/R44849.pdf.
USCIS. (2017). Characteristics of H1B Specialty Occupation Workers. 27h. https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/reports/Characteristics-of-Specialty-Occupation-Workers-H-1B-Fiscal-Year-2017.pdf.
Othman, Z., & Idris, N. A. (2015). Migrasi dan Keselamatan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka.
