Performance evaluation is an important activity of human resources management with which we determine the degree to which employees of an organization fulfill their duties or responsibilities, by assessing their behavior, level of training and performance. For this reason the employee performance appraisal is the basis of the rewards system of motivation, to improve performance and identify strengths and weaknesses of the employee.
Professional performance evaluation study in Cluj-Napoca City Hall was based on a survey among executive public officials, applying a questionnaire to provide a large amount of information and a great power of generalization. Through the study we proposed three hypotheses of work with reference to some changes from the last performance appraisal, the correlation between the grade obtained and the degree of fulfillment of work tasks, determining the type of interview style as a stage of the assessment process. The results of the study confirm the first two hypotheses and refute the third hypothesis, confirming that the style used mainly in the performance evaluation process is "Share", style through which the manager involves the subordinate in solving problems and, consequently in yielding the best results.
1. Achim, M.I., Hinescu, A., Popa, D. (2005), Managementul serviciilor publice, Cluj-Napoca:Risoprint Publishing.
2. Berchi, B. A. (2000), Cartea func?ionarului public, Sibiu:Teora Publishing.
3. Charpentier, P., Deroy, X. et al (2000), Organization et gestion de l’entreprise, Paris:Economica Publisher.
4. Cole, G.A. (2000), Managementul personalului, Bucure?ti:Codecs Publishing.
5. Cole, G. A. (1996), Management. Theory and practice, London:The Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd.
6. Gandolfi, V. (2006), Il governo delle imprese, seconda edizione, Parma: Uni.Nova Publisher.
7. Ikramullah, M., Shah, B. et al (2011), ‘Fairness Perceptions of performance Appraisal System: An empirical Study of Civil Servants in District Dera Ismail Khan’, International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 2, 21, Special Issue – November, pp. 92-100.
8. Lankeu, M. R., Maket, J. L. (2012), ‘Towards a Results-Oriented Public Service in Kenya: The Modern Human Resource Management Perspective’, International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 3, 21, pp. 265-271.
9. Manolescu, A. (1998), Managementul resurselor umane, Bucuresti:Rai Publishing.
10. Mondy, R. W., Noe, R. M., Premeaux, S. R. (2002), Human resource management, eighth edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
11. 11.Neam?u, M. (2007), Evaluarea Performan?elor Profesionale, Component? a Managementului Resurselor Umane, Craiova:Universitaria Publisher.
12. Pell, A.R. (2003), The complete Idiot’s guide to managing people, third edition, New York:Alpha Books Publishing.
13. Pitariu, H. (2000), Managementul resurselor umane. Evaluarea performan?elor profesinale, Bucure?ti:ALL Beck Publishing.
14. Ro?ca, C., Ro?ca, D., Negulescu, M.C., Neam?u, M. (2005), Resurse umane. Preg?tirea continu?. Gestiunea carierei, Craiova:Universitaria Publisher.
15. Sethi, D. (2000), ‘Cei ?apte R ai p?rerii bune despre tine’, in Hesselbein F., Goldsmith M., Beckhard R., coordinators, Organiza?ia viitorului, Bucure?ti: Teora Publishing, pp. 172-177.
Copyright: © 2014 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
