International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Chances and Challenges of EFL Teaching Powered by ChatGPT on Developing the Students’ Critical Thinking

Open access
The emerging Artificial Intelligence chatbot - ChatGPT has captured the attention and interest of individuals worldwide. Its potential for application in education, specifically in EFL teaching, is promising. However, studies on the role of ChatGPT in EFL teaching within China remain limited. Previous research primarily focuses on examining ChatGPT and its implementation in other educational fields. Therefore, this paper aims to explore the opportunities and potential challenges associated with integrating ChatGPT into EFL teaching, emphasizing the development of critical thinking skills among students. This qualitative study involved four college teachers from Southern China who have been utilizing ChatGPT in their teaching since its launch. Semi-structured interviews were conducted revealed that using ChatGPT supports teachers in enhancing both the quality and efficiency of their instruction while simultaneously providing personalized learning support for their students. However, there are concerns regarding students' overreliance on the chatbot leading to a lack of critical thinking were noted. Consequently, this study provides some strategies to encourage critical thinking among students. These strategies include fostering students' independence of thought, facilitating group discussions and debates, employing project-based teaching (PBL), and introducing writing exercises into teaching methods. This research is highly significant for the integration of ChatGPT into EFL teaching, as it serves as valuable reference material for educators seeking guidance on how to use this innovative tool effectively. Future studies can expand on these results by conducting quantitative analyses of EFL teaching and ChatGPT integration.

Arif, F. K. M., Zubir, N. Z., Mohamad, M., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). Benefits and challenges of using game-based formative assessment among undergraduate students. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(4), 203-213.
Bishop, L. (2023). A Computer Wrote this Paper: What ChatGPT Means for Education, Research, and Writing. Research and Writing.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Brown, H. D. (2004). Some practical thoughts about students’ sensitive critical pedagogy. The Language Teacher, 28( 7) : 23?27.
Burger, B., Kanbach, D. K., Kraus, S., & Corvello, V. (2023) On the use of AI-based tools like ChatGPT to support management research. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(7), 233-241.
Chapelle, C. A. (2005) Interactionist SLA theory in CALL research [A]. In Egbert J L & Petrie G M (eds.). CALL Research Perspective[C]. New York: Routledge, 2005. 65–76?
Chartr. (2022) ChatGPT: the AI bot taking the tech world by storm. https://www.chartr.co/stories/2022-12-09-1-chatgpt-taking-thetech-world-by-storm Accessed 25 Jan 2023
Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and Cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023) Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1-22.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Lexington, Massachusetts: D.C. Heath & Company.
Garcia-Penalvo, F. J. (2023). The perception of Artificial Intelligence in educational contexts after the launch of ChatGPT: Disruption or Panic?.
http://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/2838
Hadjerrouit, S. (2011). A collaborative writing approach to wikis: Design, implementation, and evaluation. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, (8):431-449.
Harrer, S. (2023). Attention is not all you need: The complicated case of ethically using large language models in healthcare and medicine. eBioMedicine, 90, 104512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104512
Hern, A. (2022) AI-assisted plagiarism? ChatGPT bot says it has an answer for that. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/dec/31/ai-assisted-plagiarism-chatgpt-bot-says-it-has-an-answerfor-that
Ji, H., Han, I., & Ko, Y. (2023). A systematic review of conversational AI in language education: Focusing on the collaboration with human teachers. Journal of ?esearch on Technology in Education, 55(1): 48?63.
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Kuchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, & Krusche, G. (2023). ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education. Learn. Individual Differences, 103, 102274.
Kirmani, A. R. (2022). Artificial intelligence-enabled science poetry. ACS Energy Letters, 8, 574-576.
Kitamura, F. C. (2023). ChatGPT is shaping the future of medical writing but still requires human judgment. Radiology, 307(2), e230171. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230171
Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78:160-173.
Kubacka, T. (2022) Today I asked ChatGPT about the topic I wrote my PhD about. https://twitter.com/paniterka_ch/status/ 1599893818186543105 Accessed 25 Jan 2023
Kumar, A. H. S. (2023). Analysis of ChatGPT tool to assess the potential of its utility for academic writing in biomedical domain. BEMS Reports, 9(1), 24-30.
Lim, T. M., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). Teachers’ perception towards the use of Quizizz in the teaching and learning of English: A systematic review. Sustainability, 13(11), 6436.
Marche, S. (2022). The College Essay Is Dead. Theatlantic,
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/12/chatgpt-ai-writing-college-student-essays/672371/
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mizumoto, A., & Eguchi, M. (2023). Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automoated essay scoring. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4373111
Nair, V., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). A systematic review of digital storytelling in improving speaking skills. Sustainability, 13(17), 9829.
Rubini, P. A., James, P. P., Yong, K. L., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). Hear me out! Digital storytelling to enhance speaking skills. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci, 9, 190-202.
Qadir, J. (2022). Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education. DOI: 10.36227/techrxiv.21789434
Rajendran, T., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). A systematic literature review on the use of mobile-assisted language Learning (MALL) for enhancing speaking skills among ESL and EFL learners. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(1), 586-609.
Roose, K. (2023). Don’t Ban ChatGPT in Schools. Teach With It. New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/12/technology/chatgpt-schools-teachers.htm
Said, N. E. M., Yunus, M. M., Doring, L. K., Asmi, A., Aqilah, F., & Li, L. K. S. (2013). Blogging to enhance writing skills: A survey of students' perception and attitude. Asian Social Science, 9(16), 95.
Saman, E., Asieh, A. (2022). Examining the roles of social presence and human-likeness on Iranian EFL learners’ motivation using artificial intelligence technology: A case of CSIEC chatbot. Interactive Learning Environments, https: / /doi.org /10.1080 /10494820.2022.2096638.
Sharma, A., Lin, I. W., Miner, A. S., Atkins D. C., & Althoff, T. (2023) Human–AI collaboration enables more empathic conversations in text-based peer-to-peer mental health support. Nat Mach Intell. 5, 46–57.
Warschauer, M., Tseng, W., Yim, S., Webster, T., Jacob, S., Du, Q, & Tate, T. (2023). The affordances and contradictions of AI-generated text for second language writers. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4404380
Ya-Ting, C., Yang, Wan-Chi, I. Wu. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: a year-long experimental study. Computers & Education, 59(2), 339-352.
Yunus, M. M., & Salehi, H. (2012). The effectiveness of Facebook groups on teaching and improving writing: Students’ perceptions. International journal of education and information Technologies, 1(6), 87-96.
Yunus, M. M., Nordin, N., Salehi, H., Embi, M. A., & Salehi, Z. (2014). Future of ICT as a Pedagogical Tool in ESL Teaching and Learning. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 7(4), 764-770.
Yunus, M. M., Zakaria, S., & Suliman, A. (2019). The Potential Use of Social Media on Malaysian Primary Students to Improve Writing. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(4), 450-458.
Zakaria, S. M., Yunus, M. M., Nazri, N. M., & Shah, P. M. (2016). Students’ experience of using Storybird in writing ESL narrative text. Creative Education, 7(15), 2107-2120
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39.