International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Validation of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire in Malaysian Context

Open access
Recovery is an essential process to eliminate stress due to work demands. However, a valid and reliable instrument to examine different dimensions of recovery experience among Malaysian workers is currently unavailable. Thus, the purpose of the present study is to examine the psychometric properties of an existing and well-validated survey instrument on recovery in the work setting that was adapted for employees in Malaysia. The Recovery Experience Questionnaire (REQ) was empirically tested among 353 Malaysian employees. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and measurement invariance were used for analysis. Results showed the four-factor structure of the instrument, consisting of psychological detachment, relaxation, control, and mastery, was supported. Internal consistencies of all subscales were satisfactory, and the instrument was invariant across gender, age, type of occupation, and over time. The present study provides initial evidence that the REQ is a valid and reliable instrument to simultaneously measure psychological detachment, relaxation, control, and mastery among workers in Malaysia.
Almén, N., Lundberg, H., Sundin, Ö., & Jansson, B. (2018). The reliability and factorial validity of the Swedish version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire. Nordic Psychology, 70(4), 324–333. https://doi.10.1080/19012276.2018.1443280
Bakker, A. B., Sanz-Vergel, A. I., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., & Oerlemans, W. G. M. (2015) The state version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire: A multilevel confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(3), 350–359. https://doi.10.1080/1359432X.2014.903242
Brown, T. A. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233-255. https://doi.10.1207/
De Bloom, J., Geurts, S. A. E., & Kompier, M. A. J. (2013). Vacation (after-) effects on employee health and well-being, and the role of vacation activities, experiences and sleep. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 14(2), 613–633. https://doi.10.1007/s10902-012-9345-3
Geurts, S. A. E. (2014). Recovery from work during off-job time. In G. Bauer & O. Hämmig (Eds.) Bridging occupational, organizational and public health (pp. 193-208). Springer.

Geurts, S. A. E., & Sonnentag, S. (2006). Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health impairment. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 23, 482–492. https://doi.10.5271/sjweh.1053
Hammer, L. B., Cullen, J. C., Neal, M. B., Sinclair, R. R., & Shafiro, M. V. (2005). The Longitudinal Effects of Work-Family Conflict and Positive Spillover on Depressive Symptoms Among Dual-Earner Couples. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10(2), 138–
154. https://doi.10.1037/1076-8998.10.2.138
Hobfoll, S. E. (2012). Conservation of resources and disaster in cultural context: the caravans and passageways for resources. Psychiatry, 75(3), 227-32. https://doi.10.1521/psyc.2012.75 .3.227.
Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J-P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 103–
128. https://doi.10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
Jakobsen, J. C., Gluud, C., Wetterslev, J., & Winkel, P. (2017). When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials - a practical guide with flowcharts. BMC Med Res Methodology, 17(1), 162. https://doi.10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1.
Meijman, T. F., & Mulder, G. (1998). Psychological aspects of workload. In P. J. D Drenth, H. K. Thierry & C. J. De Wolff (Eds.) Handbook of work and organizational psychology (pp. 5-33). Psychology Press.
Mojza, E. J., Sonnentag, S., & Bornemann, C. (2011). Volunteer work as a valuable leisure-time activity: A day-level study on volunteer work, non-work experiences, and well-being at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, 123–152. https://doi.10.1348/096317910X485737
Mostert, K., & Els, C. (2015). The psychometric properties of the Recovery Experiences Questionnaire of employees in a higher education institution. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 25, 37 - 43. https://doi.10.1080/14330237.2014.997006
Muhamad Nasharudin, N. A., Idris, M. A., Loh, M. Y., & Tuckey, M. (2020). The role of psychological detachment in burnout and depression: A longitudinal study of Malaysian workers. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 61(3), 423-435. https://doi.10.1111/sjop. 12622s15328007sem0902_5
Shimazu, A., Sonnentag, S., Kubota, K., & Kawakami, N. (2012). Validation of the Japanese version of the recovery experience questionnaire. Journal of occupational health, 54(3), 196–205. https://doi.10.1539/joh.11-0220-oa
Sonnentag, S. (2011). Recovery from fatigue: The role of psychological detachment. In P. L. Ackerman (Eds.) Cognitive fatigue: Multidisciplinary perspectives on current research and future applications (pp. 253-272). American Psychological Association.
https://doi.10.1037/12343-012
Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2007). The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 204–221. https://doi.10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204

Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2015). Recovery from job stress: The stressor?detachment model as an integrative framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 72-
103. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1924
Sonnentag, S., & Geurts, S. A. (2009). Methodological issues in recovery research. In S. Sonnentag, P. Perrewe & D. Ganster (Eds.) Current Perspectives on job-stress recovery, Emerald Group (pp.1-36). Bingley.
Sonnentag. S., & Schiffner, C. (2019). Psychological Detachment from Work during Nonwork Time and Employee Well-Being: The Role of Leader’s Detachment. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 22, E3. https://doi.10.1017/sjp.2019.2
Sonnentag, S., Kuttler, I., & Fritz, C. (2010). Job stressors, emotional exhaustion, and need for recovery: A multi-source study on the benefits of psychological detachment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(3), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.06.005
Trógolo, M., Morera, L., Castellano, E., Sponton, C., Medrano, L. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire at Argentine workers. Anales De Psicologia, 36: 181-188. https://doi.org/10.6018/ANALESPS.352761
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428 10031002.
Van Veldhoven, M. (2008). Need for recovery after work: An overview of construct, measurement and research. In J. Houdmont & S. Leka (Eds.) Occupational health psychology: European perspectives on research, education and practice (pp. 1-25). Nottingham University Press.
Wentz, K., Gyllensten, K., Sluiter, J. K., & Hagberg, M. (2020). Need for recovery in relation to effort from work and health in four occupations. International archives of occupational and environmental health, 93(2), 243–259. https://doi.10.1007/s00420-019-01476-7