International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Stages in Group Work: Is There A Relationship Among Them?

Open access

Yusnita Sokman, Ahmad Kamalrulzaman Othman, Azlan Abdul Aziz, Mohd Hafizan Musa, Nurhafizah Azizan, Noor Hanim Rahmat

Pages 2779-2799 Received: 12 Oct, 2023 Revised: 09 Nov, 2023 Published Online: 06 Dec, 2023

http://dx.doi.org/10.46886/IJARBSS/v13-i11/7669
Group work increases learning by allowing students to study and complete assignments with the assistance of their group members. However, it may result in an unequal distribution of obligations and contributions. Teams have long been used in education to teach students how to be productive team members. Today, educators prioritise the creation of collaborative learning environments, replacing lecture-style classrooms with student-centred ones. The goal of this study is to investigate learners' perceptions of learning strategies based on the four stages of Tuckman's Model, which include the forming, storming, norming, and performing stages. This is a quantitative study conducted online using survey methodologies, and the sample was drawn from Malaysian public universities. The survey's instrument was divided into four major sections. A survey of 231 Malaysian higher education students found that the performing stage of group work learning has high evaluation scores, indicating that despite uncertainties in the forming, storming, and norming stages, group members united to achieve the objectives. The storming stage had a positive relationship with all three stages, with a strong positive relationship between storming and forming. Overall, learners were satisfied with each stage. The current study indicates that future research should be conducted to discover ways for improving the effectiveness of group work in teaching and learning based on a pedagogical approach.
Appavoo, P., Sukon, K. S., Gokhool, A. C., & Gooria, V. (2019). Why does collaborative learning not always work even when the appropriate tools are available?. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(4), 11-30.
Brannen, S. F., Beauchamp, D., Cartwright, N. M., Liddle, D. M., Tishinsky, J. M., Newton, G., & Monk, J. M. (2021). Effectiveness of group work contracts to facilitate collaborative group learning and reduce anxiety in traditional face-to-face lecture and online distance education course formats. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2021.150205.
Bonebright, D. A. (2010). 40 years of storming: A historical review of Tuckman’s model of small group development. Human Resource Development International, 13, 111-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13678861003589099.
Chang, B., & Kang, H. (2016). Challenges facing group work online. Distance education, 37(1), 73-88.
Chen, C. H., & Yang, Y. C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of a project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001.
Chou, S. Y., & Garcia, D. C. (2011). Group organizational citizenship behavior in the stages of group development. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(10), 3.
Costley, J. (2021). How role-taking in a group-work setting affects the relationship between the amount of collaboration and germane cognitive load. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00259-w
Croy, G. & Eva, N. (2018). Student success in teams: intervention, cohesion and performance. Education + Training, 60 (9),1041-1056. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-11-2017-0174.
Ferdous, T., & Karim, A. (2019). Working in groups outside the classroom: Affective challenges and probable solutions. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 341-358.
Frances, M. (2008). Stages of group development – a PCP approach. Personal Construct Theory & Practice, 5, 10-18. http://www.pcpnet.org/journal/pctp08/frances08.pdf.
Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and instruction, 43, 1-4.
Freeman, L., & Greenacre, L. (2011). An examination of socially destructive behaviors in group work. Journal of Marketing Education, 33(1), 5-17.
Guttenberg, J. L. (2020). Group development model and Lean Six Sigma project team outcomes. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 11(4), 635-661.https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-09-2018-0101.
Hasan, R., Hussain, S., Malik, M. H., & Akhtar, N. (2023). Group work assessment: Assessing peer assessment at Global College of Engineering and Technology. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 156, p. 02001). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202315602001.
Hefter, M. H., & Berthold, K. (2020). Preparing learners to self-explain video examples: Text or video introduction?. Computers in Human Behavior, 110, 106404 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106404
Hennebry, M., & Fordyce, K. (2018). Cooperative Learning on an International Masters. Higher Education Research & Development,37(2),270–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1359150.
Poort, I., Jansen, E., & Hofman, A. (2022). Does the group matter? Effects of trust, cultural diversity, and group formation on engagement in group work in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(2), 511-526. 10.1080/07294360.2020.1839024.
Jackson, D., Sibson, R. and Riebe, L. (2014). Undergraduate perceptions of the development of team-working skills. Education + Training,56(1),7-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-01-2013-0002.
Jaiswal, A., Karabiyik, T., Thomas, P., & Magana, A. J. (2021). Characterizing team orientations and academic performance in cooperative project-based learning environments. Education Sciences, 11(9), 520. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090520.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in University Teaching, 25(4), 1-26.
Kamaludin, P. N. H., Yusof, M., Nawi, S., Nordin, N. A., Zabidin, N., & Sain, N. (2022). Group online engagement: An analysis from Tuckman Model. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(9), 931 – 949. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i9/14625.
Kamarudin, N. A., Fadhlullah, A., Ghazali, R. M., Sulaiman, Z. M., Othman, S., & Rahmat, N. H. (2023). A study of relationship between variables in group behaviour among undergraduates. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 13(5), 2609 – _2626.http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i5/17046.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F., & Zambrano, J. R. (2018). From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13, 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9277-y.
Kyte, L., Lindaas, I., Dahl, H., Valaker, I., Kleiven, O.T., & Sægrov, S.N. (2023). Nursing students’ preferences for learning medical and bioscience subjects. A Qualitative Study. Nursing Reports, 13, 622 - 633.
LaBeouf, J. P., Griffith, J. C., & Roberts, D. L. (2016). Faculty and student issues with group work: what is problematic with college group assignments and why?.Journal of Education and Human Development,5(1),13-23 .https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v5n1a2.
Leopold, H., & Smith, A. (2019). Implementing reflective group work activities in a large chemistry lab to support collaborative learning. Education Sciences, 10(1), 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci10010007.
Murphy, L., Eduljee B. N., Parkman, S., & Croteau, K. (2018). Gender differences in teaching and classroom participation methods: A pilot study. Journal of Psychosocial Research, 13(2), 307-319. https://doi.org/10.32381/JPR.2018.13.02.
Nawi, M., binti Nordin, N. A., binti Zabidin, N., & Sain, N. (2022). Group online engagement: an analysis from Tuckman Model. Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(9), 931-949.
Nawi, S. M., Yusof, S. M., Kamaludin, P. N. H., & Sain, N. (2021). Exploring Malaysian tertiary students’ behavioural, cognitive, emotional and social engagement and disengagement in ODL. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(4), 1296-1311.
Jacskon, S.L.(2015). Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Miller, D. L. (2003). The stages of group development: A retrospective study of dynamic team processes. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 20, 121-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2003.tb00698.x.
Mohd Rick, A. M., Wan Mohd, W. N. H., Abd Rahman, M., Sukiman, S. A., Mokhtar, R., & Katawazai, R. (2022). Exploring online group work using Tuckman’s Model. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(11), 187-205.
Pardede, P. (2020). Integrating the 4Cs into EFL Integrated Skills Learning. Journal of English Teaching), 6(1), 71-85.
Poort, I., Jansen, E., & Hofman, A. (2019). Intercultural group work in higher education: costs and benefits from an Expectancy-Value Theoryp. International Journal of Educational Research, 93, 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.11.010.
Prytherch, A., Sinnott, E., Howells, A., Fuller?Love, N. and O'Gorman, B. (2012). Gender differences in early group formation. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 4 (2),128-152.
https://doi org.ezaccess.library.uitm.edu.my/10.1108/17566261211234643.
Rahmat, N. H. (2020) Conflict resolution strategies in class discussions. International Journal of Education,12(3),49-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ije.v12i3.16914.
Rahmat, N. H., Aripin, N., Razlan, Z., Arepin, M., Mohandas, E. S., & Mok, S. S. (2021). Analysing the cadence of group conflicts across gender during online Learning. European Journal of Open Education and E-Learning Studies,6(2),55-69.
Regina O. Smith (2008) The paradox of trust in online collaborative groups.Distance Education, 29(3), 325-340.10.1080/01587910802395839.
Riebe, L., Roepen, D., Santarelli, B. and Marchioro, G. (2010).Teamwork: effectively teaching an employability skill. Education + Training,56(6/7),528-539 https://doi-org.ezaccess.library.uitm.edu.my/10.1108/00400911011068478.
Salas, E., Cooke, N. J., & Rosen, M. A. (2008). On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments. Human factors, 50(3), 540-547. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288457.
Samad, S. A., Shahid, K. H. M., Ghazali, M. H., Hussain, S. S. H. @, Krishnan, D., Yaakob, A. F., & Rahmat, N. H. (2023). A study of the relationship of factors in the Tuckman Model. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(6), 1160 – _1177. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i6/17185.
Sansivero, G. (2016). Challenges and advantages of collaborative learning: Developing workforce readiness in students. Seen Magazines US articles.
Shen, L., & Chen, I. L. (2023). Schoolteachers' perspectives of Augmented Reality in classroom teaching. In Shaping the Future of Online Learning: Education in the Metaverse ,134-153. IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-6684-6513-4.ch008.
Shonk, K. (2020). 3 types of group conflicts and how to address them. Harvard Law
School Program on Negotiation.
http://www.pom.harvard.edu/daily/conflcitresolution/types-conflict/
Situmorang, M.A. (2021). Students’ perception of using group work in English Class. Journal of English teaching, 7(1), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v7i1.2302.
Smith, G. G., Sorensen, C., Gump, A., Heindel, A. J., Caris, M., & Martinez, C. D. (2011). Overcoming student resistance to group work: Online versus face-to-face. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 121-128.
Svolik, M.W. (2009). Power sharing and leadership dynamics in authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science. Midwest Political Science Association. 53(2), 447-494 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00382.
Tucker, R., & Abbasi, N. (2016). Bad attitudes: Why design students dislike teamwork. Journal of learning design, 9(1), 1-20.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022100.
Tuckman’s Teamwork Survey. (2016). Knowledge jump.
http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/leader/teamsuv.html.
Vaida, S. & ?erban, D. (2021). Group development stages. A brief comparative analysis of various models. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Psychologia-Paedagogia, 66(1), 91-110.
van Hattum-Janssen, Natascha. (2009). Student perceptions of group work. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229049584_Student_perceptions_of_group_workWheelan, S. A. (2009). Group size, group development, and group productivity. Small Group Research, 40, 247-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496408328703.
Wheelan, S. A., & Conway, C. (1991). Group development as a framework to understand and promote school readiness to engage in an organizational development project. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 2, 59-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532768xjepc0201_4.
Wong, F. M. F., Kan, C. W. Y., & Chow, S. K. Y. (2022). From resistance to acceptance in small group work: Students' narratives. Nurse Education Today, 111, 105317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105317.
Zaharuddin, A. M., Almuddin, A., Ammar, A., & Rahmat, N. H. (2022). Exploring group dynamics in the arabic classroom using Tucker’s Development. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,12(6),1576-1599. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i6/13188.
Zheng, L., Li, X., Zhang, X., & Sun, W. (2019). The effects of group Metacognitive Scaffolding on Group Metacognitive behaviors, group performance, and cognitive load in computer-Supported collaborative learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.03.002.