This study aimed to explore the applied pattern of school football coaches’ coaching process in Kuala Lumpur. 10 teachers also act as the football coaches and 11 school football players were the study participants and the number of participants were determined by the degree of saturation of information which is refer to no new information was discovered among the rest of the study participants (Lebar, 2017; Strauss & Corbin, 1990). The data collection and the interview duration in this study was obtained 6 months through semi structured interview as suggested by Patton (2002). This study used qualitative research method called grounded theory approach as suggested by Strauss and Corbin (1998, 1990). The data were derived from the interview session and systematically collected, transcribed and analyzed by data analysis called coding which is consist of Open Coding, Axial Coding and Selective Coding (Strauss & Corbin, 1998, 1990). Based on the findings of the study have shown there were six steps of football coaching process such as planning, pre-briefing, conduct training session, observation, coach and correct, post-briefing including training summary. At the end of the study, applied pattern of school football coaches’ coaching process in Kuala Lumpur Model was successfully produced.
Abraham, A., Collins, D., & Martindale, R. (2006). The coaching schematic: Validation
through expert coach consensus.Journal of Sport Sciences, 24(6), 549–564.
Ali, A., & Taib, M. D. (2013). Siri sukan popular bola sepak. Shah Alam:
Oxford Fajar.
Ali, M.F.M. (2016). Biomekanik Dalam Sukan Bola Sepak Di Malaysia.
Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Faculty of Creative Technology and Heritage,
16300 Bachok, Kelantan Darul Naim, Malaysia.
Barnson, S. (2014). The authentic coaching model: a grounded theory of coaching. International Sports Coaching Journal, 1, 61-74.
Bernard, H. R. (2002). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed.). Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
Black, K. (2010) “Business Statistics: Contemporary Decision Making” 6th edition, John
Wiley & Sons.
Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education. An introduction to
theory and methods (4th ed.). Boston, MA : Allyn and Bacon.
Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five
approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five
traditions. Thousand Oaks CA.: Sage Publications.
Cushion, C., Nelson, L., Armour, K., Lyle, J., Jones, R., Sandford, R., & O’Callaghan, C.
(2010). Coach learning and development: A review of literature. Leeds: sports
coach UK.
Cooper, D., & Allen, J. B. (2017). The coaching process of the expert coach: A coach led
approach. Sports Coaching Review.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and
Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks,
California: Sage.
Côté, J., Salmela, J., Trudel, P., Baria, A., & Russell, S. (1995). The coaching model: a
grounded assessment of expert gymnastic coaches’ knowledge. Journal of Sport
and Exercise Psychology, 17, (1), 1-17.
Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five
approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Esterberg, K. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. Boston, MA : McGraw-Hill.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for
qualitative research. Chicago, Ill: Aldine Pub. Co.
Gibbs, G. R., & Taylor, C. (2005). How and what to code. Retrieved from http://onlineqda.hud.ac.uk/Intro_QDA/how_what_to_code.php
Hamid, N. H. A., & Kendall, G. (2008). Maximizing stadium attendance: A case study of
Malaysian football. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling PATAT (pp. 1–4). Montreal: Université de Montréal.
Harian, S. (2014). Seimbangkan guru lelaki dan wanita. Retrieved from
http://www.sinarharian.com.my/karya/pendapat/seimbangkan-guru-lelaki-wanita-
1.269857
Irvine, R. (2012). "The Analyze-Involve-Model (AIM) Soccer Coaching Process"
Master of Science in Organizational Dynamics Theses. 53.
http://repository.upenn.edu/od_theses_msod/53
Jones, R. L., Armour, K. M., & Potrac, P. (2002). Understanding the coaching process: A
framework for social analysis. Quest, 54(1), 34-48.
Jones, R. L., Edwards, C., & Viotto Filho, I. T. (2016). Activity theory, complexity and
sports coaching: An epistemology for a discipline. Sport, Education and Society,
21(2), 200-216.
Karim, Z. A. (2016). Malaysian football coaches: The key challenges.
International Journal of Health, Physical Education and Computer Science in
Sports,24(1), 18–24.
Karim, Z. A., & Nadzalan, A. M. (2017a). The development of coaching
knowledge among Malaysian accredited football coaches. International Journal
of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 6(4), 113-127.
Karim, Z. A., & Nadzalan, A. M. (2017b). Malaysia Football Coaches:
Development Characteristics. International Journal of Academic Research in
Business and Social Sciences, 7(9),
In-Text Citation: (Khairulhalimi & Karim, 2020)
To Cite this Article: Khairulhalimi, N. F., & Karim, Z. A. (2020). Applied Pattern of School Football Coaches’ Coaching Process in Kuala Lumpur. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(5), 179–190.
Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
