International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

The Effects of ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) Blueprint Adoption on Intra-ASEAN Trade on Manufacturing Products

Open access
This paper seeks to explore the effects of ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) Blueprint adoption since 20 November 2007 on the bilateral manufacturing trade between the ASEAN member countries and their trading partners. Ten ASEAN member countries and their 39 trading partners are considered in this study. The gravity model is estimated on a set of panel data over the sample period of 1995 to 2014. Overall, it is found that AEC has created substantial trade creation effects for the exports of tobacco & manufactured tobacco substitutes, and limestone materials for manufacture of lime. On the other hand, there are substantial trade diversion effects for the exports of the fur-skins & artificial fur manufactures, manufactures of plaiting material & basketwork, miscellaneous manufactured articles, as well as the machines & apparatus.
Kumar, N. (2002a): Towards an Asian Economic Community- Vision of Closer Economic Cooperation in Asia: An Overview, Research and Information System for Non-Aligned and other Developing countries. (RIS) Discussion Paper No. 32.
Austria, M. S. (2004). Strategies towards an ASEAN Economic Community. CBERD Working Paper Series No. 2.
Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2007). Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members’ International Trade? Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 72 – 95.
Cuyvers, L., Lombaerde, P. D., & Verherstraeten, S. (2005). From AFTA towards an ASEAN economic community… and beyond. Centre for ASEAN Studies (CAS) Discussion paper No. 46.
Soesastro, H. (2005). Accelerating ASEAN Economic Integration: Moving Beyond AFTA. CSIS Working Paper Series No.091.
Soesastro, H. (2005). On ASEAN Economic Community. The Indonesian Ekonomists Association, Indonesian Economic Journal, 1.
Plummer, M. G. (2006). The ASEAN Economic Community and the European Experience. ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration No.1.
Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2007). Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members' International Trade?. Journal of International Economics, 71: 72–95.
Ismail, N. W., Smith, P., & Kugler, M. (2007). Regional Economic Integration and Intra Regional Trade: The Evidence from the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Free Trade Area. In Proceedings of 2007 Singapore Economic Review Conference.
Garcia, E. C., Pabsdorf, M. N., & Herrera, E. G. (2013). The Gravity Model Analysis: An Application on MERCOSUR Trade Flows. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 16(4):336–348.
Oh, J., & Sardar, R. R. (2013). Gravity Matters: International Trade of Bangladesh. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 25(1): 34–46.
Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales. (2014). Geographical variables. Retrieved from http://www.cepii.fr/CEPII/en/bdd_modele/presentation.asp?id=6.
Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales. (2014). Languages. Retrieved from http://www.cepii.fr/CEPII/en/bdd_modele/presentation.asp?id=19.
International Monetary Fund, Direction of International Trade Statistics Yearbook. (2014). Retrieved from http://data.imf.org/?sk=9D6028D4-F14A-464C-A2F2-59B2CD424B85.
International Monetary Fund, International Financial Statistics Yearbook (2014). Retrieved from http://data.imf.org/?sk=5DABAFF2-C5AD-4D27-A175-1253419C02D1.
The United Nation Commodity Trade Statistics Database. (2015). Retrieved from http://comtrade.un.org/db
The United Nation Conference on Trade and Development database. (2016). Retrieved from http://unctadstat.unctad.org/EN/Index.html
The World Bank, World Development Indicators (2014). GDP (current US$). Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD
The World Bank, World Development Indicators. (2014). Population, total. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL
Yang, S., & Martinez-Zarzoso, I. (2014). A Panel Data Analysis of Trade Creation and Trade Diversion Effects: The case of ASEAN-China Free Trade Area. China Economic Review, 29: 138–151.
Panda, R., & Sethi, M. (2015). India and Bilateral Trade: A Gravity Model Approach. International Journal of Business Insights & Transformation, 8(2): 30–37.
Sultan, M. & Munir, K. (2015). Export, Import and Total Trade Potential of Pakistan: A Gravity Model Approach. Munich Personal RePEc Archive MPRA Paper No. 66621.
Tumwebaze, H. K., & Nahamya, W. K. (2015). Determinants of Uganda’s Export Performance: A Gravity Model Analysis. International Journal of Economics and Business Studies, 5(1-2): 3–18.
Eita, J. H. (2016). Estimating Export Potential for a Small Open Economy Using a Gravity Model Approach: Evidence from Namibia. The Journal of Developing Areas, 50(4): 273–288.
Rasoulinezhad, E., & Kang, G. S. (2016). A Panel Data Analysis of South Korea’s Trade with OPEC Member Countries: The Gravity Model Approach.
In-Text Citation: (King et al., 2020)
To Cite this Article: King, C. W. K., Liew, V. K.-S., & Arip, M. A. (2020). The Effects of ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) Blueprint Adoption on Intra-ASEAN Trade on Manufacturing Products. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(2), 680–690.