This study explores the experience of establishing a supervisory relationship between post-graduates and supervisors from the perspective of four first semester graduate students in one of Malaysia public university. This study uses a qualitative case study design. Data are obtained through semi-structured interviews and document analysis. The findings of this research revealed that the adjustment aspect of alignment of tendency and interests, confidence, meaningful communication, high reliability, mutual respect and punctuality were the key determinants of establishing a positive supervisory relationship between post graduates and supervisors. This study also demonstrated that a healthy rapport between post graduate students and supervisors really do support their research and learning journey. Respondents also agree that students should not rely solely on supervisors, because the true reason on the success of quality thesis writing is fully under the post graduates’ own accountability and responsibility.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Beinart, H. (2014). Building and sustaining the supervisory relationship. In C. E. Watkins, & D. L. Milne (Eds.), Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision (pp. 257-281). MA: Wiley Blackwell.
Craig, C. A., Allen, M. W., Reid, M. F., Riemenschneider, C. K., & Armstrong, D. J. (2013). The Impact of Career Mentoring and Psychosocial Mentoring on Affective Organizational Commitment, Job Involvement, and Turnover Intention. Administration & Society, 45(8), 949–973. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399712451885
Creighton, L., Creighton, T., & Parks, D. (2010). Mentoring to degree completion: Expanding the horizons of doctoral prot??g??s. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260903448342
Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Research Design, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152153
Ensher, E. A., & Murphy, S. E. (2011). The Mentoring Relationship Challenges Scale: The impact of mentoring stage, type, and gender. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(1), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.11.008
Erdem, F., & Aytemur, J. O. (2008). Mentoring - A relationship based on trust: Qualitative research. Public Personnel Management, 37(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600803700104
Fong, M. L., Borders, L. D., Ethington, C. A., & Pitts, J. H. (1997). Becoming a counselor: A longitudinal study of student cognitive
Glauser, M. J. (1984). Upward information flow in organizations: Review and conceptual analysis. Human Relations, 37, 613-643.
Gill, P., and Burnard, P. (2008) The student–supervisor relationship in the PhD/doctoral process. British Journal of Nursing 17(10): 668–671.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Hamshire, C., Barrett, N., Langan, M., Harris, E., & Wibberley, C. (2017). Students’ perceptions of their learning experiences: A repeat regional survey of healthcare students. Nurse Education Today, 49, 168–173.
Hughes, J. (2012). Practical aspects of supervision: All you ever wanted to know but were too afraid to ask. In I. Fleming & L. Steen (Eds.), Supervision and clinical psychology: Theory, practice and perspectives (pp. 184–206). Hove, UK: Routledge.
Hutt, C. H., Scott, J., & King, M. (1983). A phenomenological study of supervisees' positive and negative experiences in supervision. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 20(1), 118-123.
Jafree, D. J., Whitehurst, K., & Rajmohan, S. (2016). How to approach supervisors for research opportunities. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 10, 110–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2016.01.022
Ladany, N., Mori, Y., & Mehr, K. E. (2013). Effective and ineffective supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 41(1), 28-47.
Lessing, A., & Schulze, S. (2002). Postgraduate supervision and academic support: students’ perceptions. South African Journal of Higher Education, 16(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajhe.v16i2.25253
Lewicki, R. J., & Wiethoff, C. (2000). Trust, Trust Development, and Trust Repair. In. M. Deutsch & P.T. Coleman (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (p. 86-107). San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Que, J. (20). Relationship dimensions in the professional supervision of psychology graduates: Supervisee perceptions of processes and outcome. Studies in Continuing Education, 31(2), 127-140
Meydan, B., & Denizli, S. (2018). Turkish undergraduate supervisees’ views regarding supervisory relationship. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 74, 1-24
Merriam, S. B. (2010). Qualitative case studies. In International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 456–462). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01532-3
Malik, S. A., & Malik, S. A. (2015). Graduate school supervisees’ relationships with their academic m
In-Text Citation: (Murshid, Ismail, & Baki, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Murshid, S. F., Ismail, I. A., Baki, R. (2019). Searching For an Ideal Post Graduate Supervisor: Exploring Malaysian Students’ Experience towards Supervisory Relationship. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(11), 384–399.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
