In this era of globalization, creativity and innovation have become integral in the business world and without these elements, a business might not be able to maintain its place in the market. In this regard, organizations should acquire new knowledge and skills, as well as come out with brilliant can help them to maintain and improve their position in today’s highly competitive market. In this study, a concentrated evaluation of past studies on the relationship between organizational structure, organizational learning and organizational innovativeness has been conducted to find and fill the logical research gap to help companies deal with external opportunities and threats. In light of the dynamic-abilities hypothesis, this review will fill the gap between the constructs of competitive advantage and propose a conceptual framework which can contribute towards the improvement of the existing literature.
Agbim, K. C. (2013). The impact of organizational structure and leadership styles on innovation. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 6(6), 56-63.
Agbim, K. C., Oriarewo, G. O., & Zever, T. A. (2014). Moderating effects of individual entrepreneur and enterprise characteristics on the relationship between business environmental scanning behaviour and entrepreneurial performance. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 6(1), 248.
Albers, J. A. (2009). A practical approach to implementing knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 10(1), 1-14.
Al-Mamoori, A. G. R., & Ahmad, Z. A. (2015). Linking Organizational Structure, Technological Support and Process Innovation: the Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing in the Iraqi Textile Industry. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 18, p. 01007). EDP Sciences.
Al-Qatawneh, M. I. (2014). The impact of organizational structure on organizational commitment: A comparison between public and private sector firms in Jordan. European Journal of Business and management, 6(12), 30-37.
Ambos, B., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2007). Innovation and control in the multinational firm: A comparison of political and contingency approaches. Strategic Management Journal, 28(5), 473-486.
Begoña Lloria, M. (2007). Differentiation in knowledge-creating organizations. International Journal of Manpower, 28(8), 674-693.
Chen, D. Z., Lin, W. Y., & Huang, M. H. (2007). Using essential patent index and essential technological strength to evaluate industrial technological innovation
competitiveness. Scientometrics, 71(1), 101-116.
Fang, C., Lee, J., & Schilling, M. A. (2010). Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organization Science, 21(3), 625-642.
Hao, Q., Kasper, H., & Muehlbacher, J. (2012). How does organizational structure influence performance through learning and innovation in Austria and China. Chinese Management Studies, 6(1), 36-52.
Hamidizadeh, M. R., & Eghtesadi, G. (2012). Organizational learning and organizational innovation. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 1(5), 92-94.
Hsiao, H. C., & Chang, J. C. (2011). The role of organizational learning in transformational leadership and organizational innovation. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(4), 621.
Kiziloglu, M. (2015). The Effect of Organizational Learning on Firm Innovation Capability: An Investigation in the Banking Sector. Global Business and Management Research, 7(3), 17.
María Martínez-León, I., & Martínez-García, J. A. (2011). The influence of organizational structure on organizational learning. International Journal of Manpower, 32(5/6), 537-566.
Nicolini, D., & Meznar, M. B. (1995). The social construction of organizational learning: conceptual and practical issues in the field. Human relations, 48(7), 727-746.
Starbuck, W. H. (1992). Learning by knowledge?intensive firms. Journal of management Studies, 29(6), 713-740.
Salim, I. M., & Sulaiman, M. B. (2011). Impact of organizational innovation on firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian-based ICT companies.
Tajeddini, K. (2014). The Effect of Organisational Structure and Hoteliers’ Risk Proclivity on Innovativeness. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 10(1), 1-12.
Takemura, C. M., & Melo, C. D. O. Studying agile organizational design to sustain innovation. In Embrapa Monitoramento por Satélite-Artigo em anais de congresso (ALICE). In: BRAZILIAN WORKSHOP ON AGILE METHODS, 3., 2012, São Paulo, SP. Anais... São Paulo, SP: IME/USP, 2012.
Tran, Q., & Tian, Y. (2013). Organizational structure: Influencing factors and impact on a firm. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 3(2), 229.
Yu, Y., Dong, X. Y., Shen, K. N., Khalifa, M., & Hao, J. X. (2013). Strategies, technologies, and organizational learning for developing organizational innovativeness in emerging economies. Journal of Business Research
In-Text Citation: (Hafit, Asmuni, Idris, Wahat, & Samsudin, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Hafit, N. I. A., Asmuni, A., Idris, K., Wahat, N. W. A., & Samsudin, N. S. (2019). A Conceptual Model of the Relationship between Organizational Structure, Organizational Learning, and Organizational Innovativeness in Malaysian Higher Education Institution. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(13), 146–156.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
