Sentence variety is a fundamental aspect in writing to avoid stereotypes, thus making writing more interesting. However, ESL students are often found not using the different sentence structures in writing. Students seem to learn one basic pattern and stick to it. The reason could be due to lack of knowledge and practice to write a variety of sentence structures. They seem to be reluctant to learn more about it, and teachers are reluctant to teach. Despite being fundamental, little emphasis has been put on sentence variety in the ESL Writing classes because most of the time teachers and students think that as long as there are no grammatical errors, the writing is acceptable. Even with improvement, most of them may not really achieve encouraging results in writing. Hence, this study intended to examine the respondents’ writing performance before and after using a sentence variety checklist, and to analyse the respondents’ perceptions towards using the sentence variety checklist in their writing. Twenty university students from a pre-sessional English Language programme were selected to take part in this study and data were collected qualitatively from students’ essays and their responses from a 20-item survey questionnaire. The findings revealed a slight improvement in students’ writing. They also found the checklist made writing more interesting and made the students more aware of what they were writing. In conclusion, sentence variety checklist can be one of the tools for ESL students to boost students’ writing performance.
Biber, D. (2001). Dimensions of variation among eighteenth century speech-based and written
registers. Chapter 18 in Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies. Routledge.
Clabough, C. (2014). Idiot’s Guides: Creative Writing. Penguin (USA) Inc.
Congjun, M. (2005). A Taxonomy of ESL Writing Strategies. In proceedings: Redesigning
Pedagogy: Research, Policy and Practice.
Krashen, S. (1985). Writing: Research, theory and applications. Oxford: Pergamon Institute of
English.
Langan, J. (1993) College Writing Skills with Readings, 3rd Edition. McGraw Hill College, New York.
National Commission on Writing (2003). The Neglected “R”: The Need for a Writing
Revolution, New York: College Board.
Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS Survival Manual. Retrieved from https://www.allenandunwin.com
Pedersen, L. P. (1977). Improving Syntactic and Semantic Fluency in the Writing of
Language Arts Students through Extended Practice in Sentence Combining.
University Microfilm International
Purdue OWL, Sentence Variety (2013) https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/573/01
Saddler, B. (2007). Improving Sentence Writing Ability through Sentence-Combining Practice.
ERIC Collection Search Education Resources.
Scott, C. M. & Balthazar, C. (2013) The Role of Complex Sentence Knowledge in Children with
Reading and Writing Difficulties. Perspectives on Language and Literacy. ProQuest.
Scott, C. M. & Nelson, N. W. (2009) Sentence Combining. Assessment and Intervention
Applications. Perspectives on Language Learning and Education. ProQuest.
Silva, T. (1997)Differences in ESL and Native-English-Speaker writing: The research and its
implications. In C. Severino, J. Guena and J. Butler (eds.), Writing in multicultural settings.
New York: Modern Language Association of America.
In-Text Citation: (Abdullah, Kassim, Ghani, Rahman, & Zamin, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Abdullah, L., Kassim, R., Ghani, N. A. A., Rahman, H. A., & Zamin, A. A. M. (2019). Enhancing ESL Writing Using Sentence Variety Checklist. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(13), 87–95.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
