Engineering Design Process (EDP) is one of the strategies available to implement STEM education. 37 selected articles we systemically reviewed following the Five Stages framework to extract EDP effectiveness in school setting. Information was arranged in the following sequence: kind of research, designed product, measured variables, effectiveness result and characteristics of STEM teaching and learning. It is hoped that this review provides a guide for STEM education to design their owned classroom lesson using EDP and measure its effectiveness following examples in the comprehensive list analyzed in this paper.
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Bahrum, S., & Ibrahim, M. N. (2018). Kebolehgunaan Modul “ steAm ” dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Seni Visual Sekolah Rendah Usability of " steAm " Module in Teaching and Learning of Visual Arts Education in Primary School. KUPAS SENI Jurnal Pendidikan Seni, 6(May), 65–79.
Barak, M., & Assal, M. (2018). Robotics and STEM learning: students’ achievements in assignments according to the P3 Task Taxonomy—practice, problem solving, and projects. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(1), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9385-9
Barrett, B. S., Moran, A. L., & Woods, J. E. (2014). Meteorology meets engineering: an interdisciplinary STEM module for middle and early secondary school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-7822-1-6
Bartholomew, S. R., & Strimel, G. J. (2018). Factors influencing student success on open-ended design problems. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(3), 753–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9415-2
Berland, L., Steingut, R., & Ko, P. (2014). High School Student Perceptions of the Utility of the Engineering Design Process: Creating Opportunities to Engage in Engineering Practices and Apply Math and Science Content. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 705–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9498-4
Capobianco, B. M., Yu, J. H., & French, B. F. (2015). Effects of Engineering Design-Based Science on Elementary School Science Students’ Engineering Identity Development across Gender and Grade. Research in Science Education, 45(2), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9422-1
Chittum, J. R., Jones, B. D., Akalin, S., & Schram, Á. B. (2017). The effects of an afterschool STEM program on students’ motivation and engagement. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0065-4
Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2015). Alignment of hands-on STEM engagement activities with positive STEM dispositions in secondary school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 898–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9572-6
Curriculum Development Division Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2016). Panduan Pelaksanaan Sains, Teknologi, Kejuruteraan dan Matematik (STEM) dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Retrieved from https://cms.mrsm.edu.my/cms/documentstorage/com.tms.cms.document.Document_d7d05d4f-ac12c870-38675e41-18331a55/003
Dickerson, D. L., Eckhoff, A., Stewart, C. O., Chappell, S., & Hathcock, S. (2014). The Examination of a Pullout STEM Program for Urban Upper Elementary Students. Research in Science Education, 44(3), 483–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9387-5
Duckworth, A. L., & Yeager, D. S. (2015). Measurement Matters: Assessing Personal Qualities Other Than Cognitive Ability for Educational Purposes, (May), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15584327
Duran, M., Höft, M., Lawson, D. B., Medjahed, B., & Orady, E. A. (2014). Urban High School Students’ IT/STEM Learning: Findings from a Collaborative Inquiry- and Design-Based Afterschool Program. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9457-5
Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. The Research Journal for Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.
English, L. D. (2018). Learning while designing in a fourth-grade integrated STEM problem. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, (0123456789). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9482-z
English, L. D., & King, D. T. (2015). STEM learning through engineer
In-Text Citation: (Hafiz & Ayop, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Hafiz, N. R. M., & Ayop, S. K. (2019). Engineering Design Process in Stem Education: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(5), 676–697.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
