Hansen’s disease or leprosy is one of the stigmatized skin afflictions in human history. The afflicted persons who are clinically cured often received persisting discrimination and suffer the consequences of the affliction. Stigmatization, physical restrictions, economic disadvantage and loss of self-dignity are the main elements to be considered in promoting inclusion to these former sufferers. The idea of social inclusion is initiated by World Health Organization in a five-years global elimination programme for Hansen’s disease, the Global Leprosy Strategy 2016-2020. One of the strategic pillars of the programme is to end prejudice and discrimination, and to promote inclusion among the persons affected by Hansen’s disease. By using an ethnographic approach that involves in-depth interviews and participant observations, 15 former sufferers and their family members from Kampung Sinar Baru, a village settlement in a sub-district of Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia have been selected. Findings reveal the impacts of being affected by Hansen’s disease on the lives of the former sufferers and their families such as having to separate from the family. Despite that, the affected persons have taken positive initiatives by building their own community in Rajah Charles Brooke Memorial Hospital and eventually, in Kampung Sinar Baru. By highlighting the social impacts of Hansen’s disease, inclusion then can be demonstrated by understanding the contexts and social needs of those experiencing Hansen’s disease as well as changing negative attitudes and perception towards former sufferers. By letting their voices be heard, it will provide awareness in society about the misconceptions of Hansen’s disease, in the hope to build an inclusive society that accepts differences of people.
Allman, D. (2013). The sociology of social inclusion. SAGE Open, 3, 1-16.
Boonmongkon, P. (1995). Khi thut, “the disease of social loathing”: An anthropological study of the stigma of leprosy in rural North-East Thailand. Social and Economic Research Project Reports, 16, 1-50.
Cross, H. (2006). Interventions to address the stigma associated with leprosy: A perspective on the issues. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 11(3), 367-373.
Frist, T. F. (1996). “Don’t treat me like I have leprosy!”: A guide to overcoming prejudice and segregation. London: TALMILEP.
Le, Y. (2016). ‘Here, everyone is like everyone else!’: Exile and re-emplacement in a Vietnamese leprosy village. In P. Taylor (Ed.), Connected and disconnected in Viet Nam: Remaking social relations in a post-socialist nation (pp. 141-172). Canberra, Australia: ANU Press.
Loh, K. S. (2009). Making and unmaking the asylum: Leprosy and modernity in Singapore and Malaya. Petaling Jaya, Malaysia: Strategic Information, Research and Development Centre.
Ninh, L. H. (2014). Leprosy in Sarawak, Borneo: A 5-year review from 2008 to 2012. Leprosy Review, 85, 332-335.
Raj, J. J. (2010). Struggle to overcome prejudice against leprosy: A Malaysian success story. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Leprosy Relief Association.
RCBMH (Rajah Charles Brooke Memorial Hospital). (2015). In the sanctuary of the outcasts: Life within the Rajah Charles Brooke Memorial Leprosarium. Kuching, Sarawak: Rajah Charles Brooke Memorial Hospital.
Schuller, I., van Brakel, W. H., Van Der Vliet, I., Beise, K., Wardhani, L., Silwana, S., van Elteren, M., Hasibuan, Y. & Asapa, A. S. (2010). The way women experience disabilities and especially disabilities related to leprosy in rural areas in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal, 21(1), 60-70.
Secker, J., Hacking, S., Spandler, H., Kent, L., & Shenton, J. (2005). Mental health, social inclusion and arts: Developing the evidence base (Final report from phase 1: The state of the art in England). Retrieved from http://www.socialinclusion.org.uk/publications/Phase%201%20report.pdf.
Shieh, C., Wang, H. H., & Lin, C. F. (2006). From contagious to chronic: A life course experience with leprosy in Taiwan women. Leprosy Review, 77, 99-113.
Silver, H. (2015). The context of social inclusion. New York: United Nations of Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Spandler, H. (2007). From social exclusion to inclusion? A critique of the inclusion imperative in mental health. Medical Sociology, 2(2), 3-16.
Tang, E. N. & Wong, J. (2012). The way home: The isolated emotional world of former leprosy patients and their descendants (trans by Khor Jiak Liang). Kuala Lumpur: Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia.
Try, L. (2006). Gendered experience: Marriage and the stigma of leprosy. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal, 17(2), 55-72.
Utap, M. S. & Kiyu, A. (2017). Active case detection of leprosy among indigenous people in Sarawak, Malaysia. Leprosy Review, 88, 563-567.
Varkevisser, C. M., Lever, P., Alubo, O., Burathoki, K., Idawani, C. & Moreira, T. M. A. (2009). Gender and leprosy: Case studies in Indonesia, Nigeria, Nepal and Brazil. Leprosy Review, 80, 65-76.
Vlassoff, C., Khot, S., & Rao, S. (1996). Double jeopardy: Women and leprosy in India. Rapp. Trimest. Statist. Sanit. Mond., 49(2), 120-126.
WHO (World Health Organization). (1998). WHO/EHA Emergency Health Training Programme for Africa: Coping mechanisms. Addis Ababa: Panafrican Emergency Training Centre.
WHO (World Health Organization). (2016a). Global leprosy strategy 2016-2020: Accelerating towards a leprosy-free world. New Delhi, India: World Health Organization.
WHO (World Health Organization). (2016b). Global leprosy update, 2015: Time for action, accountability and inclusion. Weekly Epidemiological Record, 91, 405-420.
Waxler, N. E. (1981). Learning to be a leper: A case study in the social construction of illness. In E. G. Mishle
In-Text Citation: (Kaur & Abd-Rahim, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Kaur, P., & Abd-Rahim, A. (2019). Promoting Social Inclusion: Voices from Persons Affected by Hansen’s Disease. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(6), 80–89.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
