The aim of this paper is to ascertain whether the single asset theory of Professor Goode is applicable in the context of Malaysia trust law. The said theory postulates that company shares of the same issue and class are a single asset that can only be co-owned. Separate ownership of the said shares is not possible. Essentially a doctrinal methodology is employed for this research. Primary sources of law include the Malaysian Companies Act 2016 and the latest common law of Malaysia and some commonwealth countries. Secondary sources of law taken into consideration include law journals published worldwide. The current law on certainty of subject matter in Malaysia pertaining to an unidentified portion of unascertained fungible shares requires only semantic certainty. This entails an accurate description of the purported trust property and its quantity. Precise identification of the shares held on trust is not required. The ensuing nature of proprietary holding of the beneficiary of the shares subject to a trust is that of separate property. The recent resurgence of the single asset theory seems to cast doubt on the current law on certainty of subject matter. The said theory postulates that company shares of the same issue are non-fungible units that can only be co-owned, namely separate ownership is not possible. If the theory is applicable in Malaysia, it would alter the current trust law on the requirement of certainty of subject matter. Identification of unascertained fungible shares subject to a trust would then be required to satisfy the requirement of certainty of subject matter. Such a conclusion means that traditional trust law which requires identification of shares subject to a trust becomes applicable. This paper concludes that the said theory cannot be justified in Malaysia as it arguably contradicts the Malaysian Companies Act 2016, the current trust law of Malaysia, Hong Kong, United States and England. Thus it is submitted that the single asset theory that seeks to revive traditional trust law pertaining to the requirement of certainty of subject matter of fungible shares has no place in current Malaysian trust law.
Birks, P. (1992). Mixing and Tracing: Property and restitution. Current Legal Problems, 45(2), 69-98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/45.Part_2.69
Chan, W. M. (2017). Essential Company Law in Malaysia: Navigating the Companies Act 2016. Subang Jaya: Thomson Reuters Malaysia Sdn Bhd. Retrieved from https://elib.usm.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=737083
Companies Act 2016.
Cooke, C. (2011). Lehman Brothers: certainty of trusts and the RASCALS litigation. Journal of International Banking & Financial Law, 26(3), 136-137. Retrieved from https://www.econbiz.de/Record/insolvency-lehman-brothers-certainty-of-trusts-and-the-rascals-litigation-briggs-j-applied-a-number-of-legal-principles-cooke-charlotte/10008900148
Dilnot, A., & Harris, L. (2012). Ownership of a fund. Journal of International Banking and Financial Law, 27(5), 272-274. Retrieved from https://www.econbiz.de/Record/insolvency-ownership-of-a-fund-dilnot-anna/10009974574
Evans, M. (1999). Opportunities For Collateralisation: Recent And Prospective Developments In Settlement (Part 1). Journal of International Banking and Financial Law, 14(9), 365. Retrieved from https://www.econbiz.de/Record/articles-opportunities-collateralisation-recent-prospective-developments-settlement-part-mark-evans-describes-recent-prospective-developments/10007053628
Goode, R. (2003). Are intangible assets fungible? Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 3(Aug), 379-388. Retrieved from https://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=130367
Goode, R. (2008). Goode on Legal Problems of Credit and Security (4th ed.). (L. Gullifer, Ed.) London: Thomson Reuters (Legal) Limited. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/17542431011018561
Hudson, A. (2007). Equity and Trusts (5 ed.). New York: Routledge-Cavendish. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.my/books/about/Equity_and_Trusts.html?id=fmF2AAAACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Hunter v Moss, [1994] 1 W.L.R. 452.
Hunter v Moss, [1993] 1 W.L.R. 934.
Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (In Administration) v Lehman Brothers Finance SA, (2010) EWHC 2914 (Ch)..
Macchiarola, M. C. (2009). Get Shorty: Toward Resurrecting The Sec's Ill-Fated Pursuit Of Pipe Arbitrageurs. Virginia Law & Business Review, Spring(4), 1-43. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/valbr4&div=3&id=&page=
MacCormick, N. (1978). Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. (H. L. Hart, Ed.) New York: Clarendon Law Series, Oxford University Press Inc. Retrieved from https://global.oup.com/academic/product/legal-reasoning-and-legal-theory-9780198763840?cc=my&lang=en&
Martin, J. (1996). Certainty of subject matter: A defence of Hunter v. Moss. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer, May/Jun, 223-227. Retrieved from https://brookes.rl.talis.com/items/9A50206B-CAAF-4995-4145-1F8A8807277E.html
Nolan, R. C. (2004). Property in a fund. Law Quarterly Review, 120(Jan), 108-136. Retrieved from https://pure.york.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/property-in-a-fund(9c16074c-9abb-42a1-9394-d34ef1cf21f2).html
Parkinson, P. (2002). Reconceptualising the express trust. Cambridge Law Journal, 61(3), 657-683. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/4508936
Pullen, K. (1999). Fungible securities and insolvency. Journal of International Banking and Financial Law, 14(7), 286-291. Retrieved from https://www.econbiz.de/Record/articles-fungible-securities-insolvency-kevin-pullen-describes-decision-high-court-hong-kong-court-first-instance-matter-pacific-securities-case-looks/10007055541
Raskolnikov , A. (2005). Contextual Analysis of Tax Ownership. Boston University Law Review, 8(April), 431-516. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=622385
Re London Wine Co (Shippers), [1986] P.C.C 121 .
Richardson v Shaw, 28 Supreme Court 512, 209 US 365.
Rofia Sdn Bhd v Taraf Dimensi (M) Sdn Bhd & Ors, [1995] MLJU 118.
Schneider, C. E., & Teitelbaum, L. E. (2006). Life's golden tree: Empirical scholarship and American law. Utah Law Review, 53-106. Retrieved from http://www.investigatorawards.
In-Text Citation: (Oon & Ling, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Oon, J. C. C., & Ling, J. L. (2019). A Critical Study on whether the Single Asset Theory is Applicable in the Creation of Private Express Trust in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(3), 475–486.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
