The purpose of this study is to develop a Model of Relationship between Teacher Leadership and Teacher Efficacy among secondary school teachers in Malaysia. The study uses both domestic and international studies. This study examines issues in the relationship between teacher leadership and teacher efficacy comprising national education policies and teacher quality. Challenges in teacher leadership and teacher efficacy include the industry revolution 4.0. international education, and international antenatal care. The implication of this study is hoped to provide additional information in the teacher leadership and teacher efficacy theory and provide a clear line of training and professionalism enhancement programs for teachers, schools and the Ministry of Education Malaysia.
Chong, W. H., & Christinie Anne, K. (2012). Teacher collaborative learning and teacher self-efficacy?: The ase of lesson study. The Journal of Experimental Education, 3(263–283).
Crimson. (2018). Top 10 Jobs in 2030: Skills You Need Now to Land the Jobs of the Future. Retrieved from https://www.crimsoneducation.org/za/blog/jobs-of-the-future
Flood, L. D., & Angelle, P. S. (2017). Organizational Influences of collective efficacy and trust on teacher leadership. International Studies in Educational Administration (Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration & Management (CCEAM)), 45(3), 85–100.
Frick, W. C., & Browne-ferrigno, T. (2016). Formation of teachers as leaders?: response to the articles in this special issue. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, Vol. 18(1), 3 –13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775116658822
Greenier, V. T., & Whitehead, G. E. K. (2016). Towards a Model of Teacher Leadership in ELT: Authentic Leadership in Classroom Practice. RELC Journal, 47(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688216631203
Jezard, A. (2018). The 3 key skill sets for the workers of 2030. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/06/the-3-skill-sets-workers-need-to-develop-between-now-and-2030/
Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025.
Parlar, H., & Cansoy, R. (2017). The effect of bureaucratic school structure on teacher leadership culture?: A mixed study *. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, (Eyfor 8), 2175–2201. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.6.0150
Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
Sterrett, W., & Irizarry, E. (2015). Beyond “ autopsy data ”: Bolstering teacher leadership , morale , and school improvement. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, Vol. 18(1), 3 –13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555458914551828
Tsai, K. C., Padre, A., & Pereira, T. (2017). DEVELOPMENT OF THE TEACHER LEADERSHIP STYLE SCALE, 45(3), 477–490.
Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2016). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership?: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, XX(X), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316653478
In-Text Citation: (Karmani & Yunus, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Karmani, N., & Yunus, J. @ N. (2019). Issues and Challenges in Developing a Relationship Model between Teacher Leadership and Teacher Efficacy. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(2), 989–993.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
