International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Identifying the Main Factors Influencing the Formation of Overconfidence Bias in Entrepreneurs: A Qualitative Content Analysis Approach

Open access

Jahangir Yadollahi Farsi, Pouria Nouri, Abdolah Ahmadi kafeshani, Mohamad Taghi Toghraee

Pages 427-439 Received: 19 Feb, 2014 Revised: 25 Mar, 2014 Published Online: 16 Apr, 2014

http://dx.doi.org/10.46886/IJARBSS/v4-i4/560
Entrepreneurship plays an exceptionally important role in today’s societies by being the main driver of economic development as well as the source of prosperity and wealth creation. Entrepreneurs need to possess some important characteristics and fulfill some important activities to reach their goals. One of the main entrepreneurial activities necessary for their survival in today’s tumultuous business environment is decision making. Entrepreneurs need to make decision regarding a lot of factors. The body of research on entrepreneurial decision making is rich and according to it entrepreneurs are prone to decision making biases in their decision making processes. Lots of factors have been identified as the main causes of these biases which, by affecting entrepreneurial decisions, play major roles in the process of managing enterprises and its subsequent success or failure. One of the most common entrepreneurial decision making biases is overconfidence, which has been introduced as a major decision making bias among individuals, as well. Overconfidence is so common among entrepreneurs that some scholars have even hypothesized that entrepreneurs are more overconfident than others. Regarding its roots, it seems that individual factors like cognition, self efficacy and motivation combined with organizational and environmental factors are the main causes of overconfidence among entrepreneurs. Overconfidence impacts entrepreneurial decisions profusely and has dual effects on entrepreneurial enterprises. On one hand, overconfidence leads to entrepreneurial unprepared entry decisions into market and subsequent failure, on the other hand, in uncertain environments and under time pressure overconfidence could be entrepreneurs’ last resort to make decisions. Entrepreneurial overconfidence has been the topic of some papers but there seems to be a lack of a comprehensive study regarding the main causes of this important bias among entrepreneurs. This paper tries to fill this gap by conducting a vast study and using qualitative content analysis. After interviewing 25 Iranian techno-entrepreneurs and coding their narratives, we have come to the conclusion that self-Efficacy; Personal Optimism, Previous Experience, Environmental Pressure, data Limitations and Availability Heuristic are the main causes of overconfidence among entrepreneurs.
• Abelson, R.P., and Levi, A. (1985). Decision-Making and Decision Theory. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(12), 45-53.
• Baron, R.A. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 275–294
• Baron, R.A. (2007). Behavioral and cognitive factors in entrepreneurship: entrepreneurs as the active element in new venture creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1 (1), 167–182
• Bazerman, M.H. (1994). Judgment in Managerial Decision Making. New York: Wiley.
• Bradley, J. (1993). Methodological issues and practices in qualitative research. Library Quarterly, 63(4), 431-449.
• Busenitz, L.W., & Barney, J.B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: biases and heuristics in strategic decision, Making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 9-30.
• Camerer, C., & Lovallo, D. (1999). Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. American Economic Review, 89(1): 306-318.
• Cooper, A.C, Woo, C.Y. & Dunkelberg. W.C. (1988). Entrepreneurs' perceived chances for success. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(2), 97-108.
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: A qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Creswell, J. W, (2005). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating. Quantitative and Qualitative Research (2nd edition).
• Denzin, N.K. (1989). Interpretive Interactionism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550.
• Fischhoff B., Lichtenstein S., Slovic P. (1977), Knowing with Certainty: The Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence, “Journal of Experimental Psychology”, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 552–564.
• Forbes, D.P. (2005). Are some entrepreneurs more overconfident than others? Journal of Business Venturing, 20(5), 623-40.
• Frese, M., M. van Gelderen and M. Ombach (2000), How to plan as a small scale business owner: Psychological process characteristics of action strategies and success, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 38, pp. 1 -18
• Guthrie, J., Johanson, U., Bukh, P.N. & Sa´nchez, P. (2003). Intangibles and the transparent enterprise: new strands of knowledge. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(4), 429-40.
• Guthrie, J. (1983). Corporate social accounting and reporting: an Australian empirical study. paper presented at the AAANZ Annual Conference, Griffith University, Brisbane.
• Hayward, M.L.A., D.A. Shepherd & D. Griffin. (2006). A Hubris Theory of Entrepreneurship, Management Science 52(2): 160-172.
• Harris, R. (1998). Introduction to decision making. Home page: http://www. vanguard. edu/rharris/crebook5. htm.[Visited 14 October 2000].
• Hsieh, H.F., & Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
• Kaish, S., & Gilad, B. (1991). Characteristics of opportunities search of entrepreneurs versus executives: Sources, interests, general alertness. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 45-61.
• Koellinger, P., Minniti, M., & Schade, C. (2007). I think I can, I think I can: Overconfidence and entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(4), 502-527.
• Koellinger, P. D. P., & Michl, T. (2012). Joy leads to Overconfidence–and a Simple Remedy (No. ERS-2012-001-STR). ERIM Report Series Research in Management.
• Langer E.J. (1975), The Illusion of Control, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 311–328
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
• Manimala, M.J. (1992). Entrepreneurial Heuristics: a comparison between high PI and low PI venture. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(6), 477-504.
• Miles, M., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.
• Milne, M. & Adler, R. (1999). Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12(2), 237-56
• Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological review, 115(2), 502
• Palich, L. & Bagby, D. (1995). Using Cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk – talking: challenging conventional wisdom. J. Bus. Venturing, 10(6), 425–438
• Oskamp S. (1965), Overconfidence in Case-Study Judgments, “Journal of Consulting Psychology”, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 261–265.
• Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage.
• Rietveld, C. A., Groenen, P. J., Koellinger, P. D. P., Loos, M. J. H. M., & Thurik, A. R. (2013). Living Forever: Entrepreneurial Overconfidence at Older Ages (No. ERS-2013-012-STR). ERIM Report Series Research in Management.
• Russo J., Schoemaker P. (1992), Managing Overconfidence, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 7-17.
• Schilling, J. (2006). On the pragmatics of qualitative assessment: Designing the process for content analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(1), 28-37.
• Shefrin, H. (2007). Behavioral Corporate Finance: Decisions that Create Value. McGraw-Hill International Edition.
• Simon, H.A (1979). Information processing models of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 30,363-396.
• Simon, M., & Houghton, S. (2003). The relationship between overconfidence and the introduction of risky products: evidence from a field study. Manage. J, 46(2), 139-150.
• Tversky A. and Kahneman D. (1973). Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, Cognitive Psychology 5: 207-232.
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
• Weber, R.P. (1990). Basic Content Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
• Weerawardena, J., & Mort, G. S. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of world business, 41(1), 21-35.