The aim of the present study is to investigate the role of two consonant coda clusters of first language Persian, second language English and third language French in the acquisition of French syllable structure when learners have achieved different levels of L2 proficiency.The following hypotheses are investigated in this study: (1) the L2 Status Factor (Rothman and Amaro, 2010) proposing that L2 impedes transfer from L1 into L3 , (2) the Cumulative Enhancement Model (Flynn et al. 2004) proposing selective transfer from the previously learned languages, (3) the Full Transfer/ Full Access Hypothesis (Håkansson, Pienemann and Sayheli, 2002), suggesting that the Universal Grammar (i.e. UG) is available in acquiring the succeeding languages.(4)Typological Primacy Model (Rothman, 2010) that believe in the similarities between the L3 and the previous languages determine the transfer into L3.To carry out the study, 30 Persian L3 French candidates at Tehran University who participated at Oxford Placement Test and French Placement Test were selected. In addition, two types of tasks were prepared to measure the L3 learners. The data analysis was carried out by one-way ANOVA as well as Mixed between-within subjects ANOVA. The results of the study proved ‘Full access/ Full transfer’ and TPM hypotheses.
Bardel, C. & Falk, Y. (2007). The role of the second language in third language acquisition:
the case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23, 459-484.
Cook, V. (1995). Multi-Competence and the learning of many languages. Language, Culture,
and Curriculum 8(2) 93-98.
Falk, Y.,&Bardel, C. (2010).The study of the role of the background languages in third language acquisition.The state of the art.International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. IRAL 48(2-3): 185–220.
Flynn, S. (2009). UG and L3 acquisition: New insights and more questions. In: Y.-k.I. Leung
(Ed.) Third Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. (pp. 71-88) Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Flynn, S., Foley, C. & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The cumulative-enhancement model for
language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of progressive clauses. International Journal o Multilingualism, 1, 3-16.
Grosjean, F. (1989). Neurologists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one
person. Brain and Language, 36, 3-15.
Håkansson, G., Pienemann, M.,& and Sayheli, S. (2002). Transfer and typological proximity in the context of second language processing.Second Language Research, 18 (33), 250-273.
Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A dynamic model of multilingualism: Perspectives of
change in psycholinguistics, 121. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.
Jessner, U. (1999). Metalinguistic awareness in multilinguals: Cognitive aspects of third
language learning. Language Awareness, 8(3&4), 201-209.
Peat, J. (2001).Health Science Research: A handbook of quantitative methods. Sydney: Allen &Unwin.
Rothman, J. (in press). L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: the
typological primacy model. Second Language Research.
Rothman, J. & Cabrelli-Amaro, J. (2010). What variables condition syntactic transfer? A look
at the L3 initial state. Second Language Research, 26, 189-218.
Schwartz, B. D. and R. A. Spouse. 1994. Word order and nominative case in nonnative
language acquisition: a longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In T. Hoekstra and B. D. Schwartz (eds.) Language acquisition studies in generative grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Schwartz, B. D. and R. A. Sprouse. 1996. L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full
Access model. Second Language Research 12: 40-72.
White, L. 1989. Universal Grammar and second language acquisition.
Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
White, L. 2003. Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, S. & Hammarberg, B. (1998). Language switches in L3 production:
Implications of a polyglot speaking model. Applied Linguistics, 19, 295-333.
Copyright: © 2014 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
