The rising demand on counterfeit goods has led to a new phenomenon in consumer behavior. Counterfeit goods have long been labelled as inferior in quality, and often targeted at consumers with low purchasing power. However, current trends show that there is a rise in the number of consumers who willingly purchase counterfeit goods despite being able to afford the original merchandise. This paper seeks to explain the phenomenon of non-deceptive counterfeit goods demand among Malaysian consumers by analyzing consumer meaning from real life experiences. The concept of consumer rationalization on this unethical practice leads to the construction of meaning behind consumer involvement in counterfeit consumption behavior. This research reveals three themes of meaning behind consumer involvement namely: “It’s just a fading material object”, “It’s just the right time” and “I need to protect it”. This research is also one of the few studies that identify the meaning behind consumer involvement in counterfeit consumption from the perspective of the consumers’ real-life experience. This paper contributes to the scholarly and managerial fields specifically in the Malaysian context by providing more insights into this phenomenon.
Alba, J. W., & Williams, E. F. (2012). Pleasure principles?: A review of research on hedonic consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.07.003
Amaral, N. B., & Loken, B. (2016a). ScienceDirect Viewing usage of counterfeit luxury goods?: Social identity and social hierarchy effects on dilution and enhancement of genuine luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(4), 483–495. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2016.02.004
Amaral, N. B., & Loken, B. (2016b). Viewing usage of counterfeit luxury goods: Social identity and social hierarchy effects on dilution and enhancement of Genuine Luxury Brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2016.02.004
Ar, A. R. (2012). Counterfeit Luxury Goods Online: An Investigation of Consumer Perceptions. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 4(2), 74–79. http://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v4n2p74
Bekir, I., El, S., & Gilles, H. (2013). How a luxury monopolist might benefit from the aspirational utility effect of counterfeiting??, 169–182. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-011-9235-x
Bian, X., & Moutinho, L. (2009). An investigation of determinants of counterfeit purchase consideration. Journal of Business Research, 62(3), 368–378. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.05.012
Bian, X., & Veloutsou, C. (2007). Cnsumers’ attitudes regarding non-deceptive counterfeit brands in the UK and Chinao. Journal of Brand Management, 14(3), 211–222. http://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2550046
Bian, X., Wang, K.-Y., Smith, A., & Yannopoulou, N. (2016). New insights into unethical counterfeit consumption. Journal of Business Research. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.038
Cesareo, L., & Stöttinger, B. (2015). United we stand, divided we fall: How firms can engage consumers in their fight against counterfeits. Business Horizons, 58(5), 527–537. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2015.05.007
Chen, Y., Zhu, H., Le, M., & Wu, Y. (2014). The effect of face consciousness on consumption of counterfeit luxury goods. Social Behavior and Personality, 42(22), 1007–1014.
Chui, C. B. (2017). The Counterfeit Goods Conundrum?: An Analysis Of Demand Situation Among Malaysian Consumers, 2(2), 11–19.
Eisend, M., & Schuchert-güler, P. (2006). Explaining Counterfeit Purchases?: A Review and Preview, 2006(12).
Elliott, R. (2006). Existential consumption and. European Journal of Marketing, 31(3/4), 285.
Kang, S. L., & Wong, E. L. (2018, April 2). Sales of fake goods hits alarming level. The Edge Financial Daily. Retrieved from http://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/sale-fake-goods-hits-alarming-level.
Kasser, T., & Ryan, M. (2001). Be Careful What You Wish For: Optimal Functioning and the Relative Attainment of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Goals.
Kastanakis, M. N., & Balabanis, G. (2012). Between the mass and the class: Antecedents of the “bandwagon” luxury consumption behavior. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1399–1407. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.005
Key, T. M., Jr, R. E. B., Adjei, M. T., & Campbell, D. A. (2013). Watch out?: Themes in timepiece communities of counterfeit consumption, 317(June), 307–317. http://doi.org/10.1002/cb
Kim, J., & Johnson, K. (2014). “Shame or pride?” European Journal of Marketing, 48(7/8), 1431–1450. http://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2013-0110
Lisa, L., Turunen, M., Lisa, L., & Turunen, M. (2015). fashion brands, 64(2), 119–138.
Meraviglia, L. (2015). Counterfeiting, fashion and the civil society. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 19(3), 230–248. http://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-06-2013-0084
Merriam, S. & Tisdell, E. (2016). Qualitative Research: a guide to design and implementation San Francisco, Calif. : Jossey-Bass.
Moon, M. A., Javaid, B., Kiran, M., Awan, H. M., & Farooq, A. (2018). Consumer perceptions of counterfeit clothing and apparel products attributes. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 36(7), 794–808. http://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-11-2017-0272
Morrin, M. (2010).
In-Text Citation: (Rosely, Yusof, Hashim, & Adzharuddin, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Rosely, N., Yusof, R. N. R., Hashim, H., & Adzharuddin, N. A. (2019). Discovering Meaning behind Consumer Involvement in Counterfeit Consumption Behaviour. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(1), 830–845.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
