International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Using MOA Framework in Predicting Research Productivity of Faculty Members with Mediation Role of Knowledge Creation Process

Open access
The world now is entering a knowledge-based era that emphasizes knowledge production through research, that is one of the main functions of higher education institutions (HEIs). This research aims to examine the antecedent factors of faculty member’s research productivity and the role of knowledge creation process in the model of the antecedent factors of faculty member’s research productivity. This research employed quantitative-survey design to collect data from 307 samples from 45 HEIs in Indonesia and 125 samples from 31 HEIs in Malaysia. Based on data analysis using smart-PLS 3, revealed that academia knowledge creation process significantly affect research productivity and have a role as a mediator in the influence of research motivation towards research productivity and the influence of research competency towards research productivity.
Aydin, O. T. (2012). The Impact of Motivation and Hygiene Factors on Research Performance?: An Empirical Study from A Turkish University. International Review of Management and Marketing, 2(2), 106–111.
Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. D. (1982). The Missing Opportunity in Organizational Research: Some Implications for a Theory of Work Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 7(4), 560–569.
Chaiyasoonthorn, W., Jongtrakul, J., & Sheehan, B. (2013). Experience of Prominent Academic Researchers in Thai Public Universities. HRD Journal, 4(1), 86–99.
Chandran, V. G. R., Hayter, C. S., & Strong, D. R. (2015). Personal strategic alliances: enhancing the scientific and technological contributions of university faculty in Malaysia. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 24(5). http://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2014.988501
Fadel, K. J., & Durcikova, A. (2014). Enhancing the Motivation, Opportunity, and Ability of Knowledge Workers to Participate in Knowledge Exchange. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science Enhancing (pp. 3605–3614). http://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.449
Griese, I., Pick, D., & Kleinaltenkamp, M. (2012). Antecedents of knowledge generation competence and its impact on innovativeness. http://doi.org/10.1108/08858621211251479
Hair, J. F. J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Long Range Planning (Vol. 46). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.002
Hesli, V. L., & Lee, J. M. (2011). Faculty Research Productivity: Why Do Some of Our Colleagues Publish More than Others? The Profession, (April). http://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511000242
Heywood, J. S., Wei, X., & Ye, G. (2011). Piece rates for professors. Economics Letters, 113(3). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.08.005
Ju, M. (2010). The Impact of Institutional and Peer Support on Faculty Research Productivity?: A Comparative Analysis of Research Vs. Non-Research Institutions. Seton Hall University.
Jusoff, K., & Samah, S. A. A. (2009). Developing Professional Track towards Excellence in Academician ’ s Career Path. Asian Culture and History, 1(2), 75–81.
Kaufman, R. R. (2009). Productivity in Scholarship Among Education Programs. Physical Therapy, 89(3).
Marrelli, A. F., Tondora, J., & Hoge, M. A. (2005). Strategies For Developing Competency Models. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 32(3), 533–561. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-005-3264-0
Miller, J. C., Coble, K. H., & Lusk, J. L. (2013). Evaluating top faculty researchers and the incentives that motivate them. Scientometrics, 97(3). http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0987-7
Mouton, J., & Waast, R. (2009). Comparative Study on National Research Systems: Findings and Lessons. In V. L. Meek, U. Teichler, & M. Kearney (Eds.), Higher Education, Research, and Innovation: Changing Dynamics, Report on the UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge 2001-2009. International Centre for Higher Education Research Kassel (INCHER-Kassel), University of Kassel.
Nonaka, I., Byosiere, P., & Borucki, C. C. (1994). Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory?: A First Comprehensive Test, 3(4), 337–351.
Nonaka, I., & Krogh, G. Von. (2009). Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory. Perspective Organization Science, 20(3), 635–652. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0412
Nonaka, I., Krogh, G. Von, & Voelpel, S. (2006). Organization Studies Evolutionary Paths and Future Advances. http://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606066312
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2005). The theory of the knowledge-creating firm?: subjectivity, objectivity, and synthesis, 14(3), 419–436. http://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth058
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., Hirata, T., & Edwards, J. S. (2009). Managing f
In-Text Citation: (Sondari, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Sondari, M. C. (2018). Using MOA Framework in Predicting Research Productivity of Faculty Members with Mediation Role of Knowledge Creation Process. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(10), 1171–1180.