International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Relationship between Education Financing and Human Capital Investment: a survey of Public secondary schools in Kimilili-Bungoma Sub- County

Open access
The aim of this study investigates the views of preschool teacher candidates on applications of educational activities in preschool education. This research is the screening model research and 110 teacher candidates attending the third and fourth grades in the Department of Preschool Teaching in Faculty of Education in Giresun University and filling out the form constitute the working group of this study. 'A Semi-Structured Interview Form' is used to gather the data of the study. With this aim, the form, was shaped by the researchers, took its last form after two experts examined them and following the necessary changes. This form includes four demographic questions and seven open ended questions. In the first place, teacher candidates are asked about their views on activities in preschool education. They are asked to select one of the following options; 'I enjoy them', 'I am reluctant', 'I have difficulty', 'I get bored'. Later, they are asked to write the reasons of their choices. Then, the teacher candidates are asked about 'doing good or doing no good' in these activities. They are asked choosing on the following options; 'I think I do good' and 'I do not think I do good'. Then, they are asked to write about the reasons of their choices. In data encoding, 'encoding pertinent to the notions gotten from data' is used. It is clear that the activities in which the participants have the most difficulty are free play, science and math, and preparations for literacy activities. It is clearly seen that 48.1% of the teacher candidates get bored during the free play activities. Such teacher candidates stated that the most important reason for this is that they have too much free time. It can be seen that teacher participants do not think (56.3%) that they do good in free play activities. What they stated as the most important reason for this is that the school has limited opportunities, so it is seen that the teacher candidates (53.6%) have difficulty in science and mathematics activities. They also stated that the most important reason for this is that 'they do not know which activities they should use'.
Acemolgu, D.J. (2007). Introduction to Modern Economics Growth. Manuscript. Department of Economics
Barro, J.R. (1991). Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of political economy.
Barro, J.R. (2000). Economic growth, Beiging China Social Sciences.
Becker, G. (1994). Human Capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to Education. Chicago. The university Press of Chicago.
Bogenschneider, K . (1997). Parental Involvement in Adolescent Schooling. A proximal process with transcontextual validity. Journal of marriage and the family
Bovenberg, A.L. & Jacobs, B. (2005). Redistribution and Education Subsidies are Siamese Twins, Journal of Public Economics
Bray, M. (2002). The cost of financing of education: Trends and policy implications, Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong and Manila; Asian Development Bank
Bronchi, C. (2003). The Effectiveness of Public Expenditure in Portugal; Economics Department Working Paper. OECD
Castronova, E. (2002). To Aid, Insure, Transfer or Control- What drives the welfare state? DIW Berlin; German Institute for Economic Research Discussion Paper
Coleman, J.S. & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and Private Schools. The impact on communities. New York. Basic books
Crepez, M. & Morse, A. (2004). The Impact of Collective and Competitive Veto Points on Public Expenditure in the Global Age: Comparative Political Studies
Cronovich, R. (1998). Measuring the Human Capital Intensity of Government Spending and its Impact on Economic Growth in a cross section of countries. Scottish journal of Political Economy.
Esping-Anderson, G. (2002). A Child Centered Social Investment Strategy, in G. Esping Anderson, with D. Gaillu, A. Hemerijck and J. Myles. Why we need a new Welfare state.
Fagerlind, A and Saha, L.J (1997). Education and National Developments. New Delhi. Reed Educational and Professional Publications.
Glomm, G. & Ravikumar, B. (1992). Public education and income inequality. European journal of political economy
Gropello, E. (2006). Meeting the Challenges of Secondary education in Latin America and East Asia: Improving efficiency and resource mobilization. Washington DC. The World Bank.
Gupta, S & Verhoeven, M. (2001). The Efficiency of Government Expenditure: Experience from Africa, journal of Policy Modeling
Hanushek, E.A. (2003) .The Failure of Input_Based Schooling Policies, Economic journal
Hanushek, E.A. & Kimko, D.D. (2000). Schooling, Labour-Force quality and the Growth of Nations, American Economic Review.
Kerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundation of Behavioral Research. New York: Holt, Renehart and Winston.
Kothari, C. (1990). Research Methodology: Methods and techniques. (Second Revised edition). New Age International Publishers.
Latham,M. (2005). “The PFI Model and its Effects on Educational Outcomes” prepared for the conference, mobilizing the Private sector for Public Education. WB. Harvard University Conference.
Lazear, E. (2002). Education in the Twenty- First Century. Stanford: Hoover Institute Press.
Lazear, E. (1999). Educational Production. Quarterly journal of Economics.
Lewin, K.M. (2008). Strategies for Sustainable Financing of Secondary Education in Sub-Saharan Africa. Center for International Education. University of Sussex, UK. SEIA Thematic study No.1. The World Bank. Washington DC
Lim, E. (2001). Determinants of and the Relation between, Foreign Direct Investment and Growth. A summary of the Recent Literature
Lucas, R.E. (1988). The Mechanics of economic development, journal of Monetary Economics, Amsterdam
Meng, X. & Azhong, Y. (2009). Human Capital Externality, Knowledge Spillover and Sustainable Economic Growth, Anals of Economic and Finance
Mugenda, O.M. & Mugenda, A.G. (1999). Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches: ACTS Nairobi, Kenya
Mingat, A. (1998).The Strategy Used by High Performing Asian Economics in Education: Some lessons for developing countries, World development.
Ngware, M.W., Onsomu, E.N., & Muthaka, D.I. (2007). Financing Secondary Education in Kenya. Cost reduction and financing options. Education Policy Analysis Archives
OECD (1996). Human capital formation and Foreign Direct investment in Developing countries. Working Paper No.211
Ogunade, A.O. (2011). Human Capital Investment in the Developing world: An Analysis of Praxis. University of Rhode Island
Olaniyan, D.A. & Okemakinde, T. (2008). Human Capital Theory: Implications for Education Development: European Journal of Scientific Research: Euro Journals Publishing.
Onsonu, E.N., Muthaka, D., Ngware, M. & Kosimbei, G. (2006). Financing of Secondary Education in Kenya: Costs and Options: KIPPRA Discussion Paper, Nairobi.
Orodho, J. (2003). Essentials of educational and social science Research Methods. Nairobi: Masola Publishers.
Psacharopoulos, G. (1994). Returns to Investment in Education: a global update, world development
Romer, P.M. (1986). Increasing returns and long- run growth. Journal of Political Economy.
Schultz, T.P. (1988). Education Investments and Returns: handbook in Development Economics. New York. The Free Press.
UNESCO. (2006). EFA Global Monitoring Report 2007. Strong Foundations: Early Childhood Care and Education. UNESCO Paris
Uwatt, B.U. (2002). Human Resource Development and Economic Growth in Nigeria. NES proceeding
Vanhuysse, P. & Sabath, C. (2004). Merging Dollars with Values: rights and resources in education worldwide. University of Haifa, Israel
Wilson, R.A. & Briscoe, G. (2004). The impact of Human Capital on economic growth: A review. Third report on vocational training research in Europe. Luxenbourg
World Bank. (2007). Expanding opportunities and building competencies for young people: A new agenda for secondary education.