International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Supply Chain Finance Analysis

Open access
Supply Chain Finance as an emergent and currently, one of the most viable and plausible financing procedural instruments is not a new conceptual framework. It has been widely noted and acclaimed as an essential aspect of supply chain management and trade finance. The global economic crises have necessitated the urgent consideration and eventual adoption of Supply Chain Finance (SCF). SCF is noted for its capability to collaborate and coordinate trade partners and procedures in order to increase
Trade transparency, the shift from paper-laden business documentation to comprehensive sophisticated automation process of concise detailed information exchange and the ultimate dematerialization of the entire supply chain process. The processes involved in a thoroughly comprehensive SCF scheme also reduces trading costs and risks shouldered by all the parties involved in the process. This study attempts to delineate and define the not so obvious but diverse trading efficiencies, value enhancement enjoyed by the users of SCF and the enormous improvement in working capital accessibility and maximization afforded by SCF in the entire supply chain process. It also seeks to highlight some of the major challenges of the SCF system thereby prescribing and providing working innovative but compelling solutions to streamline and ensure the viability and the instrumentation of SCF mechanisms and their capabilities of eradicating trade finance problems faced by various trade partners and companies. This is, by far, a brilliant innovative method of leveraging working capital accessibility and the substantial enhancement of credit ratings and values of the various companies using the SCF system to optimize trade efficiency, predictability and ultimately profitability.
Ali. (2016). Adapting e-invoicing: benefits, challenges and future strategies to overcome challenges.
Beekun, R. I., & Badawi, J. A. (2005). Balancing Ethical Responsibility among Multiple Organizational Stakeholders: The Islamic Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 60, 131–145.
Bansod & Borade. (2007). Domain of supply chain management – a state of art. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation.
Dasanayakaa, S., & Wedawatta, G. (2014). Tsunami Disaster Recovery Experience: A Case Study on Micro, Small and Medium Scale Enterprises in Southern Sri Lanka. Procedia Economics and Finance, 18, 584 – 591.
Farris, M. T., & Hutchison, P. D. (2003). Measuring Cash-to-Cash Performance. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 14(2), 83 – 92.
Ferris. (1981). A Transactions Theory of Trade Credit Use. The Quarterly Journal of Economics.
Herring. (2011). Credible Resolution Policy Is Crucial for the Effective Regulation of Systemically Important Financial Institutions.
Hofmann, E., & Belin, O. (2001). Supply Chain Finance Solutions: Relevance- Propositions - Market Value. Springer Science & Business Media.
Hofmann, E., & Kotzab, H. (2010). A Supply Chain-Oriented Approach of Working Capital Management. Journal of Business Logistics, 30(2), 2010.
Lambert & Pohlen. (2001). Supply Chain Metrics. The International Journal of Logistics.
Mentzer & DeWitt. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics.
OECD. (2009). OECD Annual Report.
PCAOB. (2010). 2009 Inspection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
Petersen & Rajan. (1997). Trade credit: Theories and evidence. Review of Financial Studies.
Richards & Laughlin. (1980). Relevance of WCM and Its Weaknesses.
Summers & Wilson. (2002). Small business start-ups: success factors and support implications. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research.
UN. (n.d.). Coherence and coordination issues related to finance for forests, taking into account different policy approaches.
In-Text Citation: (Tchamy, Peihua, Osabutey, & Yoboue, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Tchamy, J., Peihua, F., Osabutey, W., & Yoboue, W. (2018). Supply Chain Finance Analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(12), 385–395.