Acknowledging the importance of autonomous language learning with technology as an essential skill for lifelong learning, the current study was carried out to investigate whether a group of tertiary level ESL learners were able to self-direct their use of technology for effective language learning experience. The mixed-methods approach was employed to understand the phenomenon. Findings indicate that the most preferred Web 2.0 technology for language learning is the online exercises/quizzes. This is followed by online discussion/forum, public websites, blogs, and online video/audio. It could be concluded that even though these ESL learners were able to locate and select the various technologies for autonomous language learning, their main choices seemed to be restricted to the conventional ones. Thus, it is suggested that teachers should play their roles in guiding learners at tertiary level on how to utilize these technologies so that they can optimize their autonomous use of technologies for more meaningful language learning.
Bailly, S. (2011). Teenagers learning language out of school: What, why and how do they learn? How can school help them?. In P. Benson, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Beyond the language classroom (pp. 119_131). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Benson, P. (2011). Language learning and teaching beyond the classroom: An introduction to the field. In P. Benson, & H. Reinders (Eds). Beyond the language classroom (pp. 7_16). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. (2007).. Research methods in education. (6th ed.) London: Routledge.
Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. London: Sage.
Garrison, D.R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18-33.
Greenhow. C. & Robelia, B. (2009). Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learning, Media and Technology. 34(2), 119-140.
Jobstreet (2015) https://www.jobstreet.com.my/career-resources/employers-fresh-graduates-unrealistic-expectations/ Accessed: 30th Sept 2018.
Jones, T. & Cuthrell. K. (2011). YouTube: Educational potentials and pitfalls. Computers in the schools. 28(1), 75-85.
Lai, C. (2013). A framework of developing self-directed technology use for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 17, 100_122.
Lai, C., Yeung, Y., & Hu, J. (2015). University student and teacher perceptions of teacher roles in promoting autonomous language learning with technology outside the classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 703-723.
Lantolf,.P. and Pavlenko, A. (2001). (S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity theory: understanding second language learners as people. In Breen, M.P, Learner contributions to language learning. (pp 141-59). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Lantolf, J.P. and Johnson, K.E. (2007). Extending Firth and Wagner’s (1997) Ontological perspective to L2 classroom praxis and teacher education. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 877-892.
Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 14-29.
Romero, M. (2015). Work, games and lifelong learning in the 21st century. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 115-121.
MCMC (2017) Internet Users Survey. Retrieved from: https://www.mcmc.gov.my/skmmgovmy/media/General/pdf/MCMC-Internet-Users-Survey-2017.pdf accessed July 4th 2018
Ministry of Education (MoE) (2015). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015-2025 Higher Education (MEBHE). Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.
Miyazoea, T & Anderson, T. (2012). Discuss, reflect and collaborate: A qualitative analysis of forum, blog, and wiki use in an EFL blended learning course. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 34, 146-152.
Oxford, R. (2008). Hero with a thousand faces: learner autonomy, learning strategies and learning tactics in independent language learning. In Hurd, S. & Lewis, T. (Eds). Language learning strategies in independent settings, (pp. 41-67). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Statistics Portal. https://www.statista.com/statistics/262946/share-of-the-most-common-languages-on-the-internet/ Accessed: 28th October 2018.
Sockett, G., & Toffoli, D. (2012). Beyond learner autonomy: A dynamic systems view of the informal learning of English in virtual online communities. ReCALL,24(2), 138-151. 151.DOI:10.1017/S0958344012000031.
Stolk, J., Martello, R., Somerville, M., & Geddes, J. (2010). Engineering students’ definitions of and responses to self-directed learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4) , 900-913.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological process. London: Harvard University Press.
Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2007). Audience, authorship, and artifact: The emergent semiotics of Web 2.0. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,27, 1-23.
Wertsch, J.V. (1985). Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygots
In-Text Citation: (Zulkepli, Tajuddin, Atan, & Khaja, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Zulkepli, N., Tajuddin, S. N. A. A., Atan, A., & Khaja, F. N. M. (2018). A Study on Autonomous Use of Technology for Language Learning Among ESL Learners at Tertiary Level. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(11), 1093–1107.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
