International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Curriculum Management Competency of Malaysia’s Principals

Open access
Previous studies show that there are still issues of Malaysia principal competency in managing curriculum. Therefore the purpose of this study is to identify how far this statement is true and to recommend the best solution in handling this issue. The definition of competency in this study is the level of knowledge and skill that principals have in managing curriculum. To get the data, questionnaires has been sent to 314 principals, 720 senior assistants, and 611 senior teachers from all over Malaysia. Findings show that based on principals self evaluation and their subordinates evaluation, overall, principals competency in managing curriculum is at a high level with a mean score 4.30. Principals self evaluation also show that their knowledge to plan strategies to improve curriculum achievement is at a very high level but their skills to ensure teachers give priority to teaching and learning, to ensure curriculum change that is fully implemented, to encourage cooperation among teachers in implementing teaching and learning, and to mobilize effective programs are still at a medium level. Based on these findings, this study recommends that all principals must attend leadership training before being appointed as principals.
References
Abd. Razak, N., & Abdullah, W. M. R. (2003). Practice of principals from teacher perspective. Digest Educator 3 (1): 23-35.
Baruah, B., & Ward, A. (2015). Metamorphosis of intrapreneurship as an effective organizational strategy. International Entrepreneurship And Management Journal, 11(4), 811-822.
Drucker, P. (2013). Managing for the Future. New York: Routledge.
Goetsch, D. L., & Davis, S. B. (2014). Quality management for organizational excellence. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Ibrahim, M. S. (2007). System of mentoring among principals. The 14th National Seminar on Management and Leadership of Education. Pahang: Institut Aminuddin Baki. 26-27 June.
Long, A., Rejab, I., Sultan, A.A., Long, M.N., Nordin, M.S., Ismail, N. A. H., Ashraf, R., & Hashim, R. (1991). Factors that contribute to the improvement of schools' progress: Case studies. Proceeding in Seminar Teaching Between University. Kuala Lumpur: International Islamic University of Malaysia.
Marron, J. M., & Cunniff, D. (2014). What is an innovative educational leader? Contemporary Issues in Education Research (Online), 7(2), 145.
Miner, J. B. (2015). Organizational behavior 1: Essential theories of motivation and leadership. Routledge.
Ministry of Education. (2014). Malaysia educational statistics. Putrajaya: Educational Planning and Research Division, Ministry of Education.
Parkay, F. W., Anctil, E. J., & Hass, G. (2014). Curriculum leadership: Readings for developing quality educational programs. USA: Prentice Hall.
Party, L. (2013). An enterprising nation: The final report of the small business taskforce. London.
Sin, I. (2006). Construction Instrument Review. Sintok, Kedah: Universiti Utara Malaysia. Memo, 3 Jun.
Ramlan, A. (2002). A study on the causes and stress factors of the field among secondary school administrators in Klang Selangor. Unpublished thesis. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Yahaya, N., & Ismail, S. (2004). Principal leadership behavior and its relationship with work pressure and organizational effectiveness in selected schools in Negeri Sembilan. Proceedings of the 12th National Education Management and Leadership Seminar 2004, p. 183-195.
In-Text Citation: (Alias, Zainudin, & Nasri, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Alias, B. S., Zainudin, Z. N., & Nasri, N. M. (2018). Curriculum Management Competency of Malaysia’s Principals. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(10), 1101–1107.