Residence or habitat is the most important necessities of life to the people living in a systematic and orderly. The Government with financial ability aims to provide affordable housing and other infrastructure to people who are qualified. But nowadays, cost of housing and infrastructure is very expensive and it must have to have a well plan development to provide both assets. Therefore, this article aims to review the socio-economic impact by making the People's Housing Programme (PPR) Padang Hiliran, Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu as a case study. In order to achieve targets, this study used face to face interviews in depth study of the population in the scheme of PPR which involved maintenance workers and officials. Besides, secondary reference such as printed materials, online resources and other resources has been used for this study. Finding shows that there are positive effects and negative effects after their stay in the residential area of the PPR. The positive effect of showing life and their home more comfortable and composed and systematically compared with the previous place of residence, namely in slums scattered, dirty and no basic amenities. The negative impact is also part of their squatter mentality has not changed, that is not clean, like mischief or vandalism, does not comply with the regulations. Thus the authorities should ensure the troubleshooting steps either attitude or infrastructure or residents of their home state can be resolved with good and beneficial to all parties whether the occupants of the house itself and the authorities.
Aishah, A. (2013). Perubahan sosial, kesihatan dan kualiti hidup di Wilayah Metropolitan Lembah Klang-Langat. Akademika, 83(1), 11-24.
Baharuddin, A. (2007). The peoples housing programme: A study on the implementation of federal government housing in Peninsular Malaysia. Tesis Doktor Falsafah, Jabatan Antropologi dan Sosiologi, Fakulti Sastera dan Sains Sosial, Universiti Malaya.
Davenport, T.C. (2010). Public Accountability and political participation: effects of a face-to-face feedback intervention on voter turnout of public housing residents. Political Behavior, 32(3), 337-368.
Delgado, A. & Troyer, D.T. (2017). Housing preferences for affordable social housing projects in Guayaquil, Ecuador. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 10(1), 112-139.
Geoffrey K.P. (1977). Urban housing in the third world. New York: Leornard Hill.
Glassner, M. I. (1993). Political geography. Connecticut: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Hussain, M.Y., Abdul Rahman, R., Mohamed Husain, F.N., Lyndon, N. & Ibrahim, N.N. (2012). Housing bubbles assessment 2005-2010: Experiences in Klang Valley, Malaysia, Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 6(1), 33-41.
Junaidi, A.B. (2018). Analisis perkembangan pembangunan perumahan awam di Selangor. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 14(1), 40-54.
Junaidi, A.B., J., Rosmadi, F. & Amer Saifude G. (2012a). Penilaian awal impak perlaksanaan dasar perumahan negara terhadap sektor perumahan di Kuala Lumpur. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 8(6), 90-108.
Junaidi, A.B., J., Rosmadi, F. & Amer Saifude G. (2012b). Dasar perumahan negara: Hakmilik dan impak geopolitik di Kuala Lumpur. Postgraduate Research Seminar (POGRES) 2012. Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Selangor. 20-21 November.
Junaidi, A.B., J., Rosmadi, F. & Amer Saifude G. (2014). Pembangunan Program Perumahan Rakyat (PPR): Impak geopolitik di Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur dalam pilihan raya umum 2004, 2008 dan 2013. E-Bangi: Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 9(1), 001-023.
Khalid, H.N. (2012). Satu analisis mengenai dikotomi antara kemiskinan bandar dan luar bandar di Malaysia. Perspektif, 4(1), 1-21.
Lejeune, Z., Xhignesse, G., Kryvobokov, M. & Teller, J. (2016). Housing quality as environmental inequality: the case of Wallonia, Belgium. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 31(3), 495-512.
Mc Gee, T.C. (1967). The South East Asia city. London: G. Beld & Sons.
Mohammad, N., Che Ani, A.I. & Rakmat, R.A. (2017). Causes and effects of variation orders in the construction of terrace housing projects: A case study in the State of Selangor, Malaysia. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 6(1), 226-232.
Mohd Razali, A. (2001). Perumahan awam di Malaysia: dasar dan amalan. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication & Distributors. Sdn. Bhd.
Muhd Fadhil, N. (2002) Peningkatan kesejahteraan sosial melalui perumahan: Perbandingan polisi dan amalan di Malaysia dan Indonesia. PhD Thesis, Jabatan Antropologi dan Sosiologi, Fakulti Sastera dan Sains Sosial, Universiti Malaya.
Quinlivan, A. & Weeks, L. (2010). The 2009 local elections in the Republic of Ireland. Irish Political Studies, 25(2), 315-324.
Schwartz, A. (2012). US Housing Policy in the age of Obama: From crisis to stasis. European Journal of Housing Policy, 12(2), 227-240.
Shamsuddin, S. & Vale, L.J. (2017). Hoping for more: Redeveloping U.S. public housing without marginalizing low-income residents? Housing Studies, 32(2), 225-244.
Wan Azmi, R. (1982). Dasar sosial di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Sarjana Enterprise.
Xun, B. (2017). Housing equity dynamics and home improvements. Journal of Housing Economics, 37, 29-41.
In-Text Citation: (Besar, Jali, Yusof, Rosniza Aznie & Zulkipli, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Besar, J. A., Jali, M.F.M. Yusof, A. R. M., Rosniza Aznie, C. R. & Zulkipli, A. A. (2018). Socio-Economic Impact of Program Perumahan Rakyat (PPR) Padang Hiliran, Terengganu, Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(13 Special Issue: Community Development & Social Mobility), 103–112.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
