The city is a habitat of focus by people who are seeking a desirable quality of life. The influence of rapid urban development has actually had a direct effect on the urban village population, which has adapted to the ever-complex urban development environment. This study argued that the urban village population’s ability to enjoy good-quality social life would manifest itself in a strong social engagement among the population. This study found that although the majority of the urban village population were Malays, the multi-ethnic composition that exists in the surrounding urban village areas had formed a close and tight relationship. The findings showed that the urban village respondents representing three different urban levels such as Kangar (town), Alor Setar (city) and George Town (city) had a balanced perceptual value regarding social involvement. Meanwhile, the analysis related to the perception of the respondents from all three cities showed the existence of a significant relationship at p<0.05, as well as the weighted score in percentage form for the respondent’s social involvement indicators according to cities with a high standard of living.
Nor, A.R.M. (2009). Statistical Method in Research. Petaling Jaya: Prentice Hall.
Salleh, A.G. (2008). Neighboorhood factors in private low-cost housing in Malaysia. Habitat International, 32, 485-493.
Shah, A.H.H. (2004). Membentuk persekitaran untuk kemampanan budaya setempat. Dlm. Jamaludin Md Jahi, Mohd Jailani Mohd Nor, Kadir Ariffin & Azahan Awang (pnyt.). Alam Sekitar dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Malaysia, 29-34. Bangi: Pusat Pengurusan Persekitaran, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Embong, A.R. (2011). Pembandaran dan kehidupan bandar di semenanjung Malaysia. Akademika, 81 (2), 41-48.
Awang, A. (2006). Kualiti hidup masyarakat bandar di kawasan Majlis Perbandaran Seremban, Negeri Sembilan. Unpublished (Ph.D. thesis) in Environmental Management. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.
Awang, A. (2007). Kualiti Hidup dalam Konteks Persekitaran, Akses dan Kesediaan Diri Masyarakat Bandar di Malaysia. Bangi: Pusat Pengajian Siswazah, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Awang, A., Shah, A.H.H. & Aiyub, K. (2008). Penilaian makna kualiti hidup dan aplikasinya dalam bidang pengurusan persekitaran di Malaysia. Akademika, 72, 45-68.
Awang, A., Jahi, J.M., Mohamad, L.Z., Aiyub, K. & Arifin, K. (2009). The quality of life Malaysia’s intermediate city: Urban dwellers perspective. European Journal of Social Sciences, 9 (1), 161-167.
Biddulph, M. (2011). Urban design, regeneration and the entrepreneural city. Progress in Planning, 76 (2), 63-103.
Chun, Y.Z., Jia, J.W., Xian, H.F., Jing, Z., & Chai, X.W. (2011). Correlates of Quality of Life in China Rural-Urban Female Migrate Workers. Beijing: Quality of life Research Institute.
Cummins, A.R. (2005). Caregivers as managers of subjective wellbeing: a homeostatic perspective. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 18 (4), 335–344.
Cummins, A.R. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicator Research, 52, 55-72.
Diener, E. & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social indicator and subjective indicator. Social Indicator Research, 40, 189-216.
Dissart, J.C., & Deller, S.C. (2000). Quality of life in planning literature. Journal of Planning Literature, 15 (1), 135-161.
Foo, T.S. (2000). Subjective assessment of urban quality of life in Singapore (1997-1998). Habitat International, 24 (1), 31-49.
Jung-Ho, Y. & Hae, R. K. (2011). Critical success factors for urban regeneration project in Korea. International Jurnal of Project Management, 29 (7), 889-899.
Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B.P., & Glass, R. (1999). Social capital and self-rated health: a contextual analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1187-1193.
Li, L.H., & Li, X. (2011). Redevelopment of urban village in Shenzhen, China: An Analysis of Power Relations and Urban Coalitions. Journal of Habitat International, 35, 426-434.
Lim, L.Y., Yuen, B., & Low, C. (1999). Quality of Life in Cites-Definations, Approaches and Research. Urban Quality of Life: Critical Issues and Options. Singapore: School of Building and Real Estate, National University of Singapore.
Malaysia. (2010). Rancangan Malaysia ke Sepuluh, (2011-2015).
Malaysia. (2011b). Taburan Penduduk dan Ciri-Ciri Asas Demografi, 2010.
Malkina-Pykh, I.G., & Pykh, Y.A. (2008). Quality-of-life indicators at different scales: theoretical background. Journal of Ecological Indicators, 8, 854 – 862.
Massam, B.H., (2002). Quality of life: Public planning and private living. Progress in Planning, 58, 141-227.
McMahan, E.A., & Estes, D. (2011). Measuring lay conception of well-being: the beliefs about well-being scale. Journal Happiness Study, 12, 137-144.
Michalos, A.C. & Robinson, S.R. (2011). The good life: Eighth century to third century BCE. Dlm. K.C. Land, A.C. Michalos, & M.J. Sirgy (edt). Handbook Of Social Indicators And Quality-Of-Life Research, 96-135. New York: Springer.
Samsurijan, M.S., Hussain, M.Y., Manaf, A.A., Aznie C.
In-Text Citation: (Samsurijan, Firdaus, Leng, & Gopal, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Samsurijan, M. S., Firdaus, R. B. R., Leng, K. S., & Gopal, P. S. (2018). Urban Village Population in Malaysia: What Really Determines Social Engagement? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 1267–1287.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
