This paper discusses challenges for ethnically divided society in democratic countries. Generally, Malaysia fits as one. Since independence, Malaysia’s political stability has frequently been tested by various ethnically-driven issues and challenges. Consequently, Malaysia came out with national integration policy in order to address those and integrate the ethnics. However, ethnocentrism along societal development has created tension among the ethnics and become obstacles in social integration. As a qualitative study, this paper looks at democratization in the ethnocentric Malaysian society from the inside, rather from the outside. It argues that despite the continuing efforts for democratization geared towards state development, socioeconomic disparities among ethnics are still prevalent and widespread. Among others, they have contributed to segregate economic control along social line rooted in preponderant social hierarchy among the ethnics in Malaysia.
Average Monthly Household Income According to Ethnic Groups in Malaysia, 1999-2016. Retrieved from http://www.epu.gov.my/ms.
Muzaffar, C. (2008). Hegemony: Justice; Peace. Selangor: Arah publication.
Chua, A. (2003). World on fire: How Exporting free market democracy breeds ethnic hatred and global instability. New York: Anchor Books.
Crouch, H. (1996). Government and society in Malaysia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Deschouwer, K. (2005). Power Sharing New Challenges for Divided Societies (O’Flynn, I., & Russell, D), The Unintended Consequences of Consociational Federalism: The Case of Belgium. London: Pluto Press.
Easterly, W. (2001). Can institutions resolve ethnic conflict? Economic Development and Cultural Change, 49 (4): 687–706.
Easterly, W. (2006). Centre for global development: social cohesion in direct masses.
Fish, M. S. & Kroenig, M. (2006). Diversity conflict and democracy. Some evidence from uerasia and east europe. Democratization, 13(5): 828–842.
Friedkin, N., E. Social Cohesion Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 30:409-425 (Volume publication date 11 August 2004) First published online as a Review in Advance on March 30, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.11062
Furnivall, J.S. (1948). Colonial policy and practice: A comparative study of Burma and Netherlands India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Green, A.; Preston, J.; Janmaat, J. (2006). Education equality and social cohesion: a comparative analysis. Springer.
Greenberg, E.S., & Page, B.I. (2011). The Struggle for Democracy 10th edition. United States of America: Pearson.
Heyneman, S. (2000). From the party state to multi-ethnic democracy: education and social cohesion Europe and Asia. Educational Evaluation Policy Analysis, vol. 22 no 173-191.
Horowitz, D. L. (2014). Ethnic Power Sharing: Three Big Problems. Journal of Democracy, 25 (2): 6-20.
Horowitz, D. L. (2001). The Deadly Ethnic Riot. United States of America: University of California Press.
Wealth of tycoons on 2018 Forbes Malaysia rich list soars. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbespr.
Incidence of Poverty According to Ethnic Groups in Malaysia, 1999-2016. Retrieved from http://www.epu.gov.my/ms.
Huntington, S. P. (1991). The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century. United States: University of Oklahoma Press.
Jomo, K. S. & Gomez, E.T. (1997). Malaysia’s Political Economy: Politics, patronage and profits. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Jomo, K. S. (2007). Malaysia’s New Economic Policy and National Unity. Journal of Third World Quarterly, 11(4): 36-53.
Jomo, K. S. & Wee Chong Hui. (2014). Malaysia@50: Economic development, distribution, disparities. Petaling Jaya: Strategic Information and Research Development Centre.
Khoo Boo Teik & Francis Loh Kok Wah. (2002). Democracy in Malaysia, Discourses and Practices. United States: Prentice Hall.
Lijphart, A., Consociational Democracy. World Politics, Vol. 21, No. 2 (Jan., 1969), pp. 207-225 Published by: Cambridge University Press.
Lijphart, A., Crepaz, Markus M. L. (1991). Corporatism and Consensus Democracy in Eighteen Countries: Conceptual and Empirical Linkages. British Journal of Political Science, 21(2): 235–46.
Mohamed, M. (2017, February 16). Personal interview.
Mohamad, M. (2007). Legal coercion, legal meaning and UMNO’s legitimacy. In Edmund Terence Gomez E, T (eds.). Politics in Malaysia the Malay Dimension, pp. 24-49. London and New York: Routledge.
Khalid, M. A. (2014). The colour of inequality: ethnic, class, income and wealth in Malaysia. Petaling Jaya MPH Group Publishing sdn bhd.
Parekh, B. (2005). Unity and Diversity in Multicultural Societies. Lecture delivered at the International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva. Available at< www. ilo. org/public/english/bureau/inst/download/1parekh. pdf>. Introduction, 25.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Rabushka,
In-Text Citation: (Zakaria & Daud, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Zakaria, J., & Daud, S. (2018). Democratization in Ethnocentric Society. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 1164–1174.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
