International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Cartoonic and Non-Cartoonic Simulations in Reducing Biology Students’ Misconceptions in Cell Division

Open access
This study was conducted on a total sample of 136 Malaysian Form 4 Biology students to reduce students’ misconceptions in Cell Division using cartoonic and non-cartoonic simulations. Treatment group were taught by non-cartoonic simulation whereas control group were taught by cartoonic simulation. This study was quasi experimental and employed quantitative analysis involving pre achievement and post achievement test. All the data were gathered and analysed using descriptive statistics and inferential statistics such as paired samples t-test and one way ANCOVA. The results showed that the treatment group had significantly reduced misconceptions after taught by non-cartoonic simulation when compared to control group in Cell Division. Hence, findings of this study emphasize the importance of non-cartoonic simulation in reducing Biology students’ misconceptions.
Ali, M. A. Z. (2007). Effects of various user-controlled animation strategy courseware on the students cognitive and retention skills (Unpublished PhD’s thesis). Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang.
Lee, A. E., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2010). How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach. Computers and Education, 55(4), 1424-1442.
Nordin, A., & Kamar, A. N. S. (2011). Tahap pemahaman pelajar terhadap konsep Pembahagian Sel dalam mata pelajaran Biologi KBSM tingkatan empat. [Online]. Tidak diterbitkan. Dipetik daripada: http://eprints.utm.my/11220/. (June 18, 2015)
Ba?er, M. (2007). The contribution of learning motivation, reasoning ability and learning
orientation to ninth grade international baccalaurate and national program students’
understanding of Mitosis and Meiosis. [Online]. Master of Science Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara. Available:
http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12608544/index.pdf. (June18, 2015)
Buckley, B. C. (2000). Interactive multimedia and model-based learning in Biology. International Journal of Science Education [Online serial], 22(9), 895–935. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/095006900416848. (May 18, 2015)
Campbell, N. A., & Reece, J. B. (2005). Biology (7th ed.). San Francisco: Pearson Education.
Chattopadhyay, A. (2012). Understanding of Mitosis and Meiosis in higher secondary
students of Northeast India and the implications for Genetics education. Education [Online serial], 2(3), 41-47. Available: http://article.sapub.org/10.5923.j.edu.20120203.04.html. (February 20, 2015)
Chen, C. J., & Teh, C. S. (2000). An affordable virtual reality technology for constructivist
learning environments. Proceeding of the 4th Global Chinese Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 414-421). Singapore.
Dikmenli, M. (2010). Misconceptions of cell division held by student teachers in biology: A drawing analysis. Scientific Research and Essay, 5(2), 235-247.
Elangovan, T. (2017). Comparison Between Realistic and Non-realistic Simulations in Reducing Secondary School Students’ Misconceptions on Mitosis and Meiosis Processes. In Karpudewan, M., Md Zain, A., Chandrasegaran, A. (Eds.), Overcoming Students' Misconceptions in Science (pp. 307-322). Singapore: Springer.
Goldberg, D. T. (2007). AP Biology (2nd Ed). New York: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc.
Jabatan Pelajaran Negeri Perak. (2012). Analysis of Malaysian Certificate of Education biology results for secondary schools from 2007-2011. Perak: Sektor Pengurusan Penilaian dan Peperiksaan.
Kara, Y., & Yesilyurt, S. (2008). Comparing the impacts of tutorial and edutainment software
programs on students’ achievements, misconceptions, and attitudes towards Biology. Journal of Science Education and Technology [Online serial], 17(1), 32-41. Available: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s10956-007-9077-z. (February 12, 2015)
Kiboss, J. K. (2002). Impact of a computer based physics instruction program on pupil’s understanding of measurement concepts and methods associated with school Science. Journal of Science Education and Technology [Online serial], 11(2), 193-198. Availabe: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1014673615275. (February 18, 2015)
Kiboss, J. K., Ndirangu, M., & Wekesa, E. W. (2004). Effectiveness of a computer mediated
simulations program in school Biology on pupils' learning outcomes in Cell Theory. Journal of Science Education and Technology [Online serial], 13(2), 207-213.
Available: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1023/B:JOST.0000031259.76872.f1. (December 18,
2015)
Kiboss, J. K., Wekesa, E. W., & Ndirangu, M. (2006). Improving students’ understanding and perception of cell theory in school biology using a computer-based instruction simulation program. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15(4), 397-410.
Knippels, M. C. P. J., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2005). Design criteria for learning and
teaching Genetics. Journal of Biological Ed
In-Text Citation: (Elangovan, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Elangovan, T. (2018). Cartoonic and Non-Cartoonic Simulations in Reducing Biology Students’ Misconceptions in Cell Division. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(4), 1247–1259.