International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Science Creative Teaching Design for Science Teachers

Open access
STEM education is an approach for teaching and learning that integrates the content, processes, and skills of mainly in science, technology, engineering and mathematics in facing the 21st-century challenges. Teachers should guide students to problem solving process, plan and design teaching activities that lead to the development of creativity and STEM proficiency. STEM students should be able to answer complex questions, investigate global issues and develop solutions for challenges and real-world problems while applying the rigor of science, technology, engineering and mathematics content in a seamless fashion. Therefore, creativity in teaching science subject is very important to encourage the students interests and engagement in science learning. A primary concern of this Science Creative Teaching Design (SCTD) is that it enables science teacher to plan and produce flexible, practical and feasible lesson plan and conduct teaching and learning. Furthermore, it encourages the teacher become creative as well as the students. Therefore, SCTD was developed from the integration of design thinking and creative thinking tools to facilitate science teachers in teaching activities. It comprises namely as Creo 1 for empathy, Creo 2 for build analogy, Creo 3 for ideation, Creo 4 for synthesis and justification and finally Creo 5 for application of knowledge. Several creative strategies were suggested in these Creo tools based on the literature reviews including role play, showing short videos, forward thinking, problem solving and designed games. It is hope that by using this Creo’s suggested will help the science teacher to plan attractive creative teaching for science teaching.
Al-Abdali, N. S., & Al-Balushi, S. M. (2016). Teaching for creativity by science teachers in grades 5–10. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(2), 251-268. DOI 10.1007/s10763-014-9612-3
Anderson, D. R. (2002). Creative teachers: Risk, responsibility, and love. Journal of Education, 183(1), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205740218300104
Batson, C. D. (2009). These things called empathy: eight related but distinct phenomena. http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0002
Braund, M., Moodley, T., Ekron, C., & Ahmed, Z. (2015). Crossing the border: science student teachers using role-play in grade 7. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(2), 107-117.
Cremin, T., & Oliver, L. (2017). Teachers as writers: A systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 32(3), 269-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1187664
Chan, D. W. (2007). Creative teaching in Hong Kong schools: Constraints and challenges. Educational Research Journal, 22(1), 1-12.
Chan, S., & Yuen, M. (2014). Personal and environmental factors affecting teachers’ creativity-fostering practices in Hong Kong. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.02.003
Daly, B., & Suggs, S. (2010). Teachers' experiences with humane education and animals in the elementary classroom: implications for empathy development. Journal of Moral Education, 39(1), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240903528733
Danaia, L., Fitzgerald, M., & McKinnon, D. (2013). Students’ perceptions of high school science: what has changed over the last decade?. Research in Science Education, 43(4), 1501-1515.
Daud, A. M., Omar, J., Turiman, P., & Osman, K. (2012). Creativity in science education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 467-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.302
Dierks, P. O., Höffler, T. N., Blankenburg, J. S., Peters, H., & Parchmann, I. (2016). Interest in science: a RIASEC-based analysis of students’ interests. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 238-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1138337
Horng, J. S., Hong, J. C., ChanLin, L. J., Chang, S. H., & Chu, H. C. (2005). Creative teachers and creative teaching strategies. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29(4), 352-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00445.x
Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: distinctions and relationships. Educational studies, 30(1), 77-87.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569032000159750
Kao, C. Y. (2014). Exploring the relationships between analogical, analytical, and creative thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569032000159750
Komorosky, D., & O’Neal, K. K. (2015). The development of empathy and prosocial behavior through humane education, restorative justice, and animal-assisted programs. Contemporary Justice Review, 18(4), 395-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2015.1093684
Mayer, R. E. (1989). Cognitive views of creativity: Creative teaching for creative learning. Contemporary educational psychology, 14(3), 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(89)90010-6
Morris, S. S., Snell, S. A., & Wright, P. M. (2006). A resource-based view of international human resources: Toward a framework of integrative and creative capabilities. Handbook of research in international human resource management, 433-448.
Oxley, J. (2011). The moral dimensions of empathy: Limits and applications in ethical theory and practice. Springer. DOI 10.1057/9780230347809
Palaniappan, A. K. (2009). Creative teaching and its assessment.
Pang, W. (2015). Promoting creativity in the classroom: A generative view. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 122
Rinkevich, J. L. (2011). Creative teaching: Why it matters and where to begin. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 84(5), 219-223. https://
In-Text Citation: (Ismail, Desa, & Balakrishnan, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Ismail, N., Desa, S., & Balakrishnan, B. (2018). Science Creative Teaching Design for Science Teachers. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(4), 1214–1220.