Writing instruction in the ESL classroom has evolved dramatically over the last few decades. Now, the focus has shifted from the final product of writing to the process of writing. The writing process is divided into three main stages: prewriting, writing and rewriting (Murray, 1985). This change has encouraged educators to look for strategies that focus on the writing process systematically and involve the learners to be focused and active at every stage of writing. One of the strategies that has been gaining popularity is self-assessment. It refers to teaching methods such as self-assessment checklist that prompt student writers to carefully think about, assess and respond to their written work systematically (Nielson, 2014). This study investigates the perception of teachers and students on the usefulness of a self-assessment checklist to assist students in the argumentative writing. Self-assessment Checklist for Undergraduate Argumentative Writing designed by Nimehchisalem et al. (2014) is used in this study. Feedback was obtained from four university writing lecturers through the Delphi method. The checklist was then implemented in the undergraduate writing classroom for a period of five weeks and students’ perception on the usability of the checklist was recorded through interviews. Observations were made to understand the implementation process of the checklist. From the experts’ feedback, a few changes were made to the checklist by adding, deleting, rewording and re-arranging items to ensure the checklist is more user- friendly. The experts perceived the checklist to be an effective tool in that it would reduce their workload especially regarding the amount of time spent providing feedback to the students. Students reported the checklist motivated them to write, created awareness on their writing ability, enhanced their understanding of argumentative writing, made them independent writers, and assisted them in writing more systematically. The observation enlightened the researchers on the items that needed more assistance or explanation from teacher during the training session.
Andrade, H. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational leadership, 57(5), 13-19.
Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting Learning and Achievement through Self-Assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 12–19.
Armstrong, T. (2013). Implementing and Managing Self-Assessment Procedures, May 2013, Masters of Natural Science Thesis, Louisiana State University
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Belachew, M., Getinet, M., & Gashaye, A. (2015). Perception and practice of self-assessment in EFL writing classrooms, Journal of Languages and Culture, 6(1), 1–8.
Dragemark-Oscarson, A. (2009). Self-assessment of writing in learning English as a foreign language. A study at the upper secondary school level. (PhD Dissertation). Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences 277. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. University of Gothenburg/Sweden.
Fontana, D., & Fernandes, M. (1994). Improvements in mathematics performance as a consequence of self-assessment in Portuguese primary school pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 407-417
Hamp-Lyons, L., & Condon, W. (2000). Assessing the portfolio: Principles for practice, theory, and research. Hampton Pr.
Honsa, Jr, S. (2013). Self-assessment in EFL Writing: A Study of Intermediate EFL Students at a Thai University. Voices in Asia Journal, 1(1), 34–57.
Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language teaching research, 4(1), 33-54.
Kear, K. (2011). Online and Social Networking Communities: A Best Practice Guide for Educators. Routledge.
Kinneavy, J. A. (1971). A Theory of discourse: The aims of discourse. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational Horizons, 87(1), 40-49.
Moritz, C. E. (1996). Student Self-Assessment of Language Proficiency: Perceptions of Self and Others.
Mrudula, P. (2002). The influence of peer feedback on self and peer assessment of overall skills. Language Testing, 19 (2), 109-131.
Murray, D. M. (1968). A writer teaches writing: A practical method of teaching composition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Nielsen, K. (2014). Self-assessment methods in writing instruction: A conceptual framework, successful practices and essential strategies. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(00), 1–16.
Nimehchisalem, V. (2010). Developing an analytic scale for argumentative writing of students in a Malaysian public university (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.
Nimehchisalem, V., Chye, D. Y. S., Kaur, S., Singh, P. J., Zainuddin, S. Z., Norouzi, S., & Khalid, S. (2014). A self-assessment checklist for undergraduate students’ argumentative writing. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(1), 65-80.
Oscarson, M. (1989) Self-assessment of language proficiency: rationale and applications. Language Testing, 6, 1-13.
Oscarson, M. (2013). Self-assessment in the classroom. In Kunnan, A. J. (Ed.). (2013). The Companion to Language Assessment, 4 Volume Set (Vol. 4). John Wiley & Sons.
Pappas, M., & Tepe, A. E. (2002). Pathways to knowledge and inquiry learning. Libraries Unlimited.
Ross, J. A., Rolheiser, C. and Hogaboam-Gray, A. (1998). Skills-training versus action research in-service: Impact on student attitudes to self-evaluation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14: 463–477.
Singh, K., & Terry, J. (2008). Fostering students’ self-assessment skills for sustainable learning. Proceedings of the EDU-COM 2008 International Conference, (November), 19–21.
Siow, L. F. (2015). Students’ Perceptions on Self-and Peer-Assessment in Enhancing Learning Experience. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 21-35.
Spencer?Cooke, B. (1989). Conditions of Participation in Rural, Non?Formal Education Programmes: A Delphi Study. Educational Media Inte
In-Text Citation: In-Text Citation: (Vasu, Nimehchisalem, Fung, & Rashid, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Vasu, K., Nimehchisalem, V., Fung, Y. M., & Rashid, S. M. (2018). The Usefulness and Effectiveness of Argumentative Writing Self-assessment Checklist in Undergraduate Writing Classrooms. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(4), 200–217.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
