This paper aims to explain the development of the Bumiputera Communicated Identity Index for Malaysian statutory bodies. The final 16 themes consist of 213 items have been developed in the instrument. The Bumiputera Communicated Identity Index will serve as the evaluation tool for Malaysian statutory bodies to identify themselves as the agencies that are actively improving the socio-economic status of Bumiputera community by promoting participation with stakeholders and citizens, which could be done via website. The Bumiputera Communicated Identity Index hopefully can be used to reduce the differences between public and private sectors. Transparency and accountability will be simultaneously improved.
Abdul Karim, M. R. A., & Khalid, N. M. (2003). E-government in Malaysia. Pelanduk Publications, Malaysia
Abdullah, W. N. R. (2010) Public sector reform in Malaysia – addressing the inequalities? In: The 28th International Congress of Administrative Sciences IIAS-IASIA, 12-17 July 2010, Bali, Indonesia.
Bakar, N. B. A., & Saleh, Z. (2016). Extent of Disclosure in the Annual Reports of Malaysian Federal Statutory Bodies. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 158.
Balmer, J. M. (2001). Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate marketing-seeing through the fog. European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4), 248-291.
Balmer, J. M., Abratt, R., & Kleyn, N. (2016). Corporate brands and corporate marketing: Emerging trends in the big five eco-system. Journal of Brand Management, 23(1), 3-7.
Barizah, N. A. B. (2013). Disclosure of Accountability Information in Public Sector Annual Report: The Case of Malaysian Federal Statutory Bodies. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
Benamati, J., & Lederer, A. L. (2001). Coping with rapid changes in IT. Communications of the ACM, 44(8), 83-88.
Berry, L. (1988). The Rhetoric of Consumerism and the Exclusion of Community',
Broos, E., & Cronjé, J. C. (2009). Information society needs of managers in a large governmental organisation. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 285-297.
Ching, W. S., Jomo, K. S., & Fay, C. K. (2005). Malaysian 'Bails Out'? Capital Controls, Restructuring and Recovery, Singapore: Singapore University Press.
Communication in Annual Reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 97-116
Community Development Journal, 23(4), 266–272.
Constitution, F. (2010). Laws of Malaysia. Reprint Federal Constitution Incorporating All Amendments Up to, 1. Retrieved on 5th March 2018 from http://www.agc.gov.my/agcportal/uploads/files/Publications/FC/Federal%20Consti%20(BI%20text).pdf
De Chernatony, L. (1999). Brand management through narrowing the gap between brand identity and brand reputation. Journal of Marketing Management, 15(1-3), 157-179.
De Fontenay, É. (2000). Pourquoi les animauxn'auraient-ils pas droit à un droit des animaux?. Le débat, 2, 138-155.
Department of Statistics Malaysia [DOSM]. (2017) Retrieved on 12th February 2018 from https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
Downey, J. & McGuigan, J. (1999) Technocities. London, SAGE Publications Ltd.
Fatma, M., & Rahman, Z. (2014). Building a corporate identity using corporate social responsibility: a website based study of Indian banks. Social Responsibility Journal, 10(4), 591-601.
Ferlie, E., & Pollitt, C. (eds). (2005). The Oxford handbook of public management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fiol, C. M., & Romanelli, E. (2011). Before Identity: The Emergence of New Organization Forms. Organization Science 23(3), 597-611.
Friedman, A. R., & Wagoner, L. D. (2015). The Need for Digital Identity in Cyberspace Operations. Warfare, 14, 42-52.
Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2007). Exploring the Ethical Identity of Islamic Banks via
Ho, S. S., & Wong, K. S. (2001). A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation, 10(2), 139-156.
Hsu, G., & Hannan, M. T. (2005). Identities, genres, and organizational forms. Organization Science, 16(5), 474-490.
Hsu, G., & Hannan, M. T. (2005). Identities, Genres, and Organizational Forms. Organization Science 16(5), 474-490.
Jain, V., Paul, N., B. E., G., & Chauhan, D. (2016). Corporate Identity: Developing Means for Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Indian Context towards Model Development. Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 7(1), 7-33.
Joseph, C. (2010). Sustainable Reporting on Malaysian Local Authority Website. Unpublished Do
In-Text Citation: (Said et al., 2018)
To Cite this Article: Said, R., Joseph, C., Sidek, N. Z. M., Zawawi, A., Zakaria, Z., Ladisma@Awis, M., Omar, N. (2018). Development of Bumiputera Communicated Identity Index for Malaysian Statutory Bodies. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(3), 195–206.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
