International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Political Islam in Islamism and Post Islamism: A Study on Islamic Renaissance Front (IRF)

Open access
Asef Bayat suggests a new approach for Islamists, called Post-Islamism which is broadly welcomed researchers towards current political Islam. Otherwise, Islamic Renaissance Front (IRF) is engaging Post-Islamism approach as a resistance to Islamism and suggested application of secularism and liberalism in Malaysian political arena. The objectives of this paper are to analyze and address clear perceptions that had found in Islamism and post-Islamism discussion. The main methodology for this paper is content analysis for interpreted IRF’s printed publications and electronic articles. This study also analyzed based on latest findings on Islamic tenets. The research covers inductive method that explains IRF works. Deductive method is also used for generalization in order to observe essential content of Islamism and post-Islamism. The study also refers to experts on the field of Islamic thought. Three members of Department of Islamic Development Malaysia (JAKIM) were chosen and interviewed so as to be more accurate in Islamic affairs explanation. The results showed that secular and liberal thought is found in the post-Islamism which is the same essence in Islamism critics. Additionally, this article resolves confusion in discourse of political Islam especially within secularism, liberalism and democracy issues. Post-Islamism also used Turkey’s Political Model as a collateral argument. However, researchers such as Sengupta have found that Turkey’s Political Model carries secularism and liberalism as well. Therefore, Turkey’s Political Model is actually secular political concepts. Besides, there are clear IRF calls for Islamist to transform Islamism to post-Islamism approach and to be secular or liberal.
Al-Qur’an al-Karim.
Akyol, M. (2012). The Turkish Mode: Marching to Islamic Liberalism. Cairo Review, 4/2012. Retrieved from: http://www.aucegypt.edu/GAPP/CairoReview/Lists/ Articles/ Attachments/ 150/CR4-Akyol.pdf [16 November 2015].
Al-Qaradawi, Y. (1993). al-Hulul al-Mustawradah wa Kaifa Janat cAla Ummatina. Al-Qahirah: Maktabah Wahbah.
Amin, H. (2010). From Islamism to Post-Islamism: A Study of a New Intellectual Discourse on Islam and Modernity in Pakistan. Thesis Phd International Institute of Social Studies The Hague, The Netherlands. Retrieved from: https://www.google.com/ url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CBwQFjAAahUKEwiixMWczJTJAhVJGo4KHfiqANM&url=http%3A%2F%2Frepub.eur.nl%2Fpub%2F19340%2FHusnulAminPhDThesispdf.pdf&usg=AFQjCNGtB9PxoZs9XceCWUSl6TEV1tfooQ&sig2=BZUSrCrhGabyQdXhaFGEqQ. [16 November 2015].
Amiri, M. (2014). Hudud Sold Out. Retrieved from: http://irfront.net/post/articles/hudud-sold-out/ [16 November 2015].
Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan JAKIM. (2012). Aliran Pemikiran Progresif dan Gerakan Liberal: Implikasinya kepada Islam di Malaysia. Islam Liberal: Isu dan Reaksi. pp. 90-106. Shah Alam: Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor.
Bahrom, H. (2014). Renungan Ke Atas Kesamarataan Peluang Yang Adil – Bahagian I. Retrieved from: http://irfront.net/post/articles/renungan-ke-atas-kesamarataan-peluang-yang-adil/ [16 November 2015].
Bayat A. (2005). What is Post-Islamism?. ISIM Review 16, Autumn 2005. Leiden: International Institute for the Study of Islam in the Modern World.
Bayat, A. (1996). The Coming of a Post-Islamist Society. Critique, Fall. pp. 43-52. Retrieved from: https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/9768/ 12_606_ 020.pdf [16 November 2015].
Britannica. (2006). Britannica Encyclopedia of World Religions. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica Inc.
Britannica. (2010). The Britannica Guide to Political and Social Movements That Change the Modern World. New York: Britannica Educational Publishing.
Bukhari, M. (2012(a)). Revolusi Pasca Islamisme II. Wacana Pemikiran Reformis. pp. 59-64. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Rennaisance Front.
Bukhari, M. (2012(b)). Transformasi Turki: Daripada Erbakan hingga Erdogen II. Wacana Pemikiran Reformis. pp. 213-220. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Rennaisance Front.
Burgat, F. (2003). Face to Face with Political Islam. New York: I. B. Tauris.
Desai, M. (2007). Rethinking Islamism: The Ideology of the New Terror. New York: I. B. Tauris.
Harakahdaily. (2014). PUM Bantah Kehadiran Ulil Absar Abdalla. Retrieved from: http://www.harakahdaily.net/index.php/berita-utama/31326-pum-bantah-kehadiran-ulil-absar-abdalla. [20 Januari 2015].
Holyoake, G. J. (2012). The Origin and Nature of Secularism. London: Watts and Co.
Islamic Renaissance Front (IRF). (2014(a)). Colloquium on Freedom of Conscience. Retrieved from: http://irfront.net/post/events/colloquium-on-freedom-of-conscience/. [20 Januari 2015].
Islamic Renaissance Front (IRF). (2014(b)). Roundtable discussion on: Islamism and Democracy: Lessons from Turkey. Retrieved from: http://irfront.net/post/events/roundtable-discussion-on-islamism-and-democracy-lessons-from-turkey/. [20 Januari 2015].
Islamic Renaissance Front (IRF). (Tth(a)). Introduction. Retrieved from: http://irfront.net/about-irf/introduction/. [20 Januari 2015].
Islamic Renaissance Front (IRF). (Tth(b)). People at IRF. Retrieved from: http://irfront.net/about-irf/people-at-irf/. [3 April 2014].
Islamic Renaissance Front (IRF). (Tth(c)). People at IRF. Retrieved from: http://irfront.net/about-irf/people-at-irf/. [12 Disember 2015].
Ismail, I. (2012). Ciri-ciri Dan Asas-asas Utama Islam Liberal Dalam Pergerakan Sisters In Islam. Islam Liberal: Isu dan Reaksi. pp. 90-106. Shah Alam: Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor.
Kepel, G. (2003). Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Majid, M. K. (2012). Islam: Antara Liberalisme & Konservatisme Di Malaysia. Ampang: Pekan Ilmu Publications.
Malaysiakini. (2014). PUM
In-Text Citation: (Othman, & Boyman, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Othman, M. A., & Boyman, S. N. (2018). Political Islam in Islamism and Post Islamism: A Study on Islamic Renaissance Front (IRF). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(1), 676–702.