International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Factors Leading to Adoption of Biogas Technology: A case Study of District Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan

Open access
Biogas is an alternate energy source; the main objective of this study is to analyze the prospects of biogas adoption in rural Pakistan by considering the constraints and opportunities. This study is restricted to district Faisalabad Punjab, Pakistan. Total data consisted of 100 respondents out of them 47 were biogas adopter and the remaining were non adopter of biogas. The list of adopters of biogas was taken from a regional institute and data were collected from the Faisalabad district by using the random sampling technique. The binary logit model is applied to get the appropriate results. It was found that there were positive association between the adoption and the number of livestock, age and land. This research study helps us to make policy options and to understand the factors behind the adoption of biogas technology.
Abort, J. G. & Vancil R. M. (1977). A Graphical Approach to Determine the Economics of Recovering Resources From Municipal Solid Waste. Conservation & Recycling vol.1, pp:299-314.
Bhat P. R., Chanakya H. N. & Ravindranath, H. N. (2001). Biogas Plant dissemination: success story of Sirsi, India. Energy for Sustainable Development, vol.1, pp: 39-46.
Hall D. O., Rosillo-Calle F., deGroot P. (1992). Biomass Energy, Lessons from Case studies in developing Countries. Energy Policy, Renewable Series, pp:63-73.
Han J.L., Mol A.P.J., Yonglong L., Zhang L. (2008). Small-scale fuelwood projects in rural China—lessons to be learnt. Energ y Policy, vol.36, pp: 2154–2162.
Kebede, Y., Gunjal K. & Coffin G. (1990). Adoption of new technologies in Ethiopian agriculture: The case of Tegulet-Bulgga, Shoa Province. Agricultural Economics vol.4, pp.27-43, 1990.
Khurshid, M. (2009). Biogas Development In Rural Areas Of Pakistan: A Sustainable Option For Domestic Energy. A scientific journal of COMSATS – SCIENCE VISION, Vol.15, no.2.
Renwick, M., Subedi,P.M. & Hutton. G. (2007). Biogas for Better Life: An African Initiative A Cost-Benefit Analysis of National and Regional Integrated Biogas and Sanitation.
Smith, K. R., Jerrett, M., Anderson, H. R., Burnett, R. T., Stone, V., Derwent, R. & Thurston, G. (2010). Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: health implications of short-lived greenhouse pollutants. The Lancet, vol. 374, pp:2091-2103.
Somda, J., Nianogo J., Nassa S. & Sanou S. (2002). Soil fertility management and socio- economic factors in crop-livestock systems in Burkina Faso: a case study of composting technology. Ecological Economics vol.43, pp:175-18.
Srinivasan, S. (2008). Positive Externalities Of Domestic Biogas Initiatives: Implications For Financing. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review. Vol.12, no.5, pp: 1476-1484
Wim, J.N. (2006). Biogas From Anaerobic Digestion Rolls Out Across Asia. Renewable Energy World, pp: 102-111.
Yadvika, A. (2004). Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different techniques a working paper.
Zheng, Y. H., Li, Z. F., Feng, S. F., Lucas, M., Wu, G. L., Li, Y., & Jiang, G. M. (2010). Biomass energy utilization in rural areas may contribute to alleviating energy crisis and global warming: A case study in a typical agro-village of Shandong, China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol.14, no.9. pp:3132-3139.