The major focus of this study was on the effect of an alternative method of writing instruction on the writing ability of Iranian university students in a public Malaysian university. The writing method introduced and implemented in this study was developed based on the four dimensions of process, genre, electronic portfolios, and analytic traits of writing. The data were sequentially collected by collecting the major and prior quantitative data through conducting an experimental study. The selected sample for the study was randomly assigned to two Experimental Groups and one Control Group. The first treatment group (WE1) incorporated the use of an on-line e-portfolio system with the analytic traits of writing while the second (WE2) only used the on-line system. The results of the research showed that although the observed difference between the two treatment groups was not significant, the learners in WE1 expressed a difference in the attitudes towards the use of analytic traits of writing. Both groups, however, showed a significant difference when compared to the performance of students in the control group. Multiple Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) also showed significant differences between both WE1 and WE2 compared to the control group in performance on the five traits of writing (Content, Organisation, Vocabulary, Language Use, and Mechanics). Although the learners in WE1 were expected to have higher writing performance compared to WE2 due to their exposure to the analytic traits of writing, this outcome was not observed. Nevertheless, the respondents of WE1 expressed satisfaction with the learning strategies they learned and applied in the course. From a teaching perspective, it was found very crucial to scaffold the writers and provide them with a framework and a pattern to know what to do and how to cover the different stages of writing.
Abrami, P., & Barrett, H. (2005). Directions for research and development on electronic
portfolios. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 31(3).
Adams, D.M. & Hamm, M.E. (1992). Portfolio Assessment and Social Studies: collecting,
selecting and reflecting on what is significant. Social Education 56. WPA.
Ahour, T., & Mukundan, J. (2009). Analytic assessment of writing: Diagnosing areas of strength
and weakness in the writing of TESL undergraduate students. Iranian Journal of Language Studies, 3(2), 195-208.
Akef, K., & Maftoon, P. (2010). Developing rating scale descriptors for assessing the stages of
writing process: The constructs underlying students` writing performances. Journal of Language and Translation, 1(1), 85 – 116.
Alifatemi, M. (2008). The Relationship between Writing Competence, Language Proficiency and
Grammatical Errors in the writing of Iranian sophomores. Published Dissertation. University Sains Malaysia.1-20.
Aliweh, A. M. (2011). The effect of electronic portfolios on promoting Egyptian EFL college
students’ writing competence and autonomy. Asian EFL Journal, 13(2), 90-132.
AlKahtani, S. (1999). Electronic Portfolios in ESL Writing: An Alternative Approach. Computer
Assisted Language Learning, 12(3), 261-268.
Allen, M. & Yancey K. B. (1997). Outside Review of Writing Portfolios: An On-Line Evaluation.
WPA 20 (3), 64-88.
Amiran, E. & Mann, J. (1982). Written composition, grades K-12: literature synthesis and report.
Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. [ED 213 034]
Azarfam, A. Y., & Kalajahi, S. A. R. (2012). Writing Portfolios: A Tool for Instruction &
Assessment. Advances in Asian Social Science, 1(1), 119-125.
Bacha, N. (2001). Writing evaluation: What can analytic versus holistic essay scoring tell us?
System, 29 (4), 371 – 383.
Barnett, B. G. (1995). Portfolio use in educational leadership preparation programs: From
theory to practice. Innovative Higher Education, 19(3), 197-206.
Barrett, H. C. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The REFLECT
initiative. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(6), 436-449.
Belanoff, P. & Marcia D. (1991). Portfolios: Process and Product. Portsmouth: Boynton.
Chang, C. C., & Tseng, K. H. (2009). Use and performances of Web?based portfolio assessment.
British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 358-370.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
DiBiase, D. (2002). Using e-portfolios at Penn State to enhance student learning. E-Education
Institute, 23.
Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and
Perspectives, 38(1), 105.
Erice, D. & Erta?, A. (2011). The impact of e-portfolio on foreign language writing skills, Ankara
Üniversitesi E?itim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 44(2), 73-94.
Farhady, H., Hezaveh, F. S., & Hedayati, H. (2010). Reflections on Foreign Language Education in
Iran. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 13(4), 1-18.
Gerbic, P., Lewis, L., & Amin, N. M. (2011). Student perspectives of e-portfolios: Change over
four semesters. In G. Williams, P. Statham, N. Brown, & B. Cleland (Eds.), Changing demands, changing directions. Proceedings Ascilite Hobart (p.423-436).
Ghanbari, B., Barati, H., & Moinzadeh, A. (2012). Rating Scales Revisited: EFL Writing
Assessment Context of Iran under Scrutiny, Language Testing in Asia, 2(1).
Gray, R. (2004). Grammar correction in ESL/EFL writing classes may not be effective. The
Internet TESL Journal, 10(11), retrieved March, 19, 2013, from http://iteslj.org/Technique/Gray-WritingCorrection.html
Hamp-Lyons, L. (1990). Second language writing: assessment issues. Cambridge and New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Huberty, C. J., & Olejnik, S. (2006). Applied MANOVA and discriminant analysis (Vol. 498). John
Wiley & Sons.
Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and researching writing. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
Jacobs, H., Zjngraf, S.A., Wormuth, D.R., Hartfield, V.F. & Hughey, J.B. (1981). Testing ESL
compositions: a practical approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Joyes, G. & Smallwood, A. (2012). JISC Final Report Template, retrieved February, 11, 2013,
from https://sites.google.com/site/epistudy.
Kennedy, E. M. (2010). Blogs, Wikis, and E-portfolios: The Effectiveness of Technology on Actual
Learning in College Composition. A published dissertation at George Mason University.
Kowalewski, E., Murphy, J., & Starns, M. (2002). Improving Student Writing in the Elementary
Classroom. Master of Arts action research project, Saint Xavier University and SkyLight Field-based Master's Program, Chicago. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED467516).
Kuo, C. H. (2008). Designing an online writing system: Learning with support. RELC Journal,
39(3), 285-299.
Matsuda, S., & Gobel, P. (2004). Anxiety and predictors of performance in the foreign language
classroom. System, 32(1), 21-36.
McLaughlin, M., Vogt, M. E., Anderson, J., DuMez, J., Peter, M. G., & Hunter, A. (1998). Portfolio models: reflections across the teaching profession.
Norwood: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
Montgomery, K. K., & Wiley, D. A. (2008). Building E-portfolios using PowerPoint: A guide for
educators. SAGE.
Motallebzadeh, K. & Babaee, M. (2010). Developing Syntactic Component of EFL Learners’
Writing Proficiency through E-portfolio Assessment. Ferdowsi Review 1(3).
Mousavi, H. S., & Kashefian-Naeeini, S. (2011). Academic writing problems of Iranian post-
graduate students at National University of Malaysia (UKM). European Journal of Social Sciences, (23)4, 593-603.
Murphy, S. (1996). Portfolio approaches to assessment: Break-through or more of the same?
Assessment of writing: Politics, Policies, Practices. New York: MLA, p.284-301.
NWREL (2002). 6 Trait Writing Assessment: A report on Introduction grades (3-12) Institute.
Austin, TX.
NWREL (2010). Center for Research, Evaluation and Assessment: 6+1 Trait Writing. Retrieved
August, 9, 2013, from http://ww.nwrel.org.
Shin, S. (2013). Developing a framework for using E-portfolios as a research and assessment
tool, ReCALL, Available on CJO.
Smith, C. B. (2003). Ed. Successful Use of the Six Traits in Writing. ERIC Topical Bibliography and
Commentary. Report No. TBC-03005.
Smith, M. (1991). Put to the test: The effects of external testing on teachers. Educational Researcher, 20(5), 8-89.
Sutherland, S. & Powell, A. (2007). Cetis SIG mailing list discussions, Retrieved January, 28,
2008, from: www.jiscmail.ac.uk/archives/cetis-portfolio.html.
Tosun, A., & Baris, T. (2011). E-portfolio applications in education. The Online Journal of New.
Tzeng, J. Y., & Chen, S. H. (2012). College students' intentions to use e?portfolios: From the
perspectives of career?commitment status and weblog?publication behaviours. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 163-176.
Valdez, P. N. (2010). Reflections on using the digital portfolio in academic writing in a Philippine
university: Problems and possibilities. Philippine ESL Journal, 5 (July), 160-170.
Wick, J. (2004). Using e-Portfolio, a Career Instruction Manual. Connecticut Distance Learning
Consortium, Retrieved September, 28, 2011, from: http://www. eportfolio. org/reference. cfm.
Yarmohammadi, L. (2002). The evaluation of pre-university textbooks. The Newsletter of the
Iranian Academy of Science, 18, 70-87.
Zhang, S. (2009). Has portfolio assessment become common practice in EFL classrooms?
Empirical studies from China. English Language Teaching, 2(2), 98.
Azarfam, A. Y., Samad, A. A., Noordin, N., Omar, Z., & Razali, A. B. M. (2017). Effectiveness of an E-Portfolio-Based Writing Method Using Analytic Traits on Writing Performance of EFL Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(14), 684-705.
Copyright: © 2017 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
