International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Electronic Money or Cash? In Face of Liquidity Crisis in Zimbabwe

Open access
The aim of the study was to assess whether plastic money can be a therapy to the cash crisis in Zimbabwe. This was done through investigating when the population of Zimbabwe would fully and willingly adopt and implement the use of plastic money using a sample of 200 respondents. The results showed that the use of plastic money is still a bit far from acceptance by individuals as people still prefer cash to electronic money reflected by a 66% cash preference vis-à-vis 3% electronic money preference. The reasons for unwillingness to change emanate from lack of understanding the concept of plastic money, lack of trust in the banking sector, fear of the unknown, exploitive charges in the use of plastic money and poor network services. Therefore in order to have a cashless society, it was recommended that the network service quality should be improved, the public should be educated, points of sale (POS) should be increased, transaction costs should be reduced, financial inclusion should be considered and confidence in the banking sector should be restored.
Baumol, W. J. (1952). The Transactions Demand for Cash: An Inventory Theoretic Approach. Oxford Journals. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882104
Bisht, A., Nair, P., Dubey, R., & Hajela, T. (2015). Analysis of the Use of Plastic Money: A Boon or a Bane. SIMSJMR) SIMS Journal of Management Research, (1), 5–11.
Clower, R. (1967). A Reconsideration of the Microfoundations of Monetary Theory. Economic Inquiry, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1967.tb01171.x
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Friedman, M. (1956). The Quantity Theory of Money: A restatement. Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money, 3–21.
Goldfeld, S. M. (1976). The Case of the Missing Money. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, (3), 683–730. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2455
Hafalir, E., & Loewenstein, G. (2009). The Impact of Credit Cards on Spending: A Field Experiment. SSRN eLibrary, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1378502
Kaseke, N. (2012). Cash or Plastic Money – An Investigation Into the Payment Mode Post Multi-Currency Period in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 1(6), 102–119.
Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes Vol. VII. Journal Of The Czech Geological Society, 49, 161–172. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/UPO9781139524278
Lowry, P. B., Gaskin, J. E., Twyman, N. W., Hammer, B., & Roberts, T. L. (2013). Taking “Fun and Games” Seriously: Proposing the Hedonic-Motivation System Adoption Model (HMSAM). Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(11), 617–671.
Patil, S. (2014). Impact of Plastic Moeny on Banking Trends in India. Int. J. Mgmt Res. & Bus. Strat, 1–7. Retrieved from http://www.ijmrbs.com/currentissue.php
Tobin, J. (1958). Liquidity Preference as Behavior Towards Risk. The Review of Economic Studies, 25(2), 65. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296205
ZIMCODD. (2016). Zimbabwe Coalition on Debt and Development. Investing in People for Social and Economic Justice. http://www.zimcodd.org/sites/default/files/pressreleasedocs/Cash%20Crisis%20Bond%20Notes%20and%20Economy-The%20Real%20Problem.pdf. Retrieved from http://www.zimcodd.org/sites/default/files/pressreleasedocs/Cash Crisis Bond Notes and Economy-The Real Problem.pdf

The authors would like to thank all respondents to the questionnaire as well as all those who participated in focus group discussions. Profound gratitude goes to the anonymous reviewers from the Journal for their comments and Fwasa Singoko from Zambia the constructive remarks.
Sakarombe, U., & Marabada, N. D. (2017). Electronic Money or Cash? In Face of Liquidity Crisis in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(11), 57-66.