Visualization is widely defined as means to support instructional process. It is easily adapted by latest technology and results in the improvement of learning achievement. The rapid change of computer technology allows some chances of multimedia learning development. The dynamic visualization multimedia is systematically developed through the following phases; analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. Based on validation by experts and tryout of the product, the dynamic visualization multimedia is feasible to be used in instructional process.
Ainsworth, S., & VanLabeke, N. (2004). Multiple forms of dynamic representation. Learning and Instruction, 14, 241–255.
Arends, R., I. (2004). Learning how to teach (6th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.
Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556–559.
Barak, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2011). Science education in primary schools?: is an animation worth a thousand pictures??, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 608–620.
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: the ADDIE approach. New York: Springer.
Borg, W. R., Gall, J. P., & Gall, M. D. (2003). Educational research an introduction (7th ed.). United States of America: Pearson Education, Inc
Catrambone, R., & Seay, A. F. (2002). Using animation to help students learn computer algorithms. Human Factors, 44, 495–511.
de Koning, B. B., Tabber, H., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2010). Attention cueing as a means to enchance learning from animation. Applied Cognitive Pschology, 21, 731-746.
Gilakjani, A. P. (2012). A study on the impact of using multimedia to improve the quality of english languange teaching. Journal of Languange Teaching and Research, 3, 1208-1215.
Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., & Cate, C. (2003). the roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 325–360.
Hoffler, T., N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: a meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 722-738.
Hoffler, T., N. (2010). Spatial ability: its influence on learning with visualizations – a meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 245-269.
Horz, H., & Schnotz, W. (2010). Cognitive Load in Learning with Multiple Representations. in Plaas, J., L., Moreno, R., Brunken, R., (Ed.). Cognitive Load Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lewalter, D. (2003). Cognitive strategies for learning from static and dynamic visuals. Learning and Instruction, 13, 177–189.
Lin, H., & Dwyer, F. M. (2010). The effect of static and animated visualization: a perspective of instructional effectiveness and efficiency. Journal Education Technology Research and Development, 58, 155-174.
Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages?. Journal of Educational Technology, 93, 390-397.
Mayer, R. E. (2011). Instruction Based on Visualization. Mayer, R. E., & Alexander, P., A. (Eds). Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (427-442). New York: Springer.
Nguyen, N., Nelson, A., J., & Wilson, T., D. (2012). Computer visualizations: factors that influence spatial anatomy compregension. Anatomical Sciences Education, 5, 98-108.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Plass, J., Moreno, R., & Brunken, R. (Eds.). (2010). Cognitive load theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Smaldino, S., E., Russel, J., D., Heinich, R., & Molenda, M. (2005). Instructional technology and media for learning (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education Inc.
Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, Australia: ACER.
Sweller, J. (2005). Implication of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In Mayer, R. E. (Ed), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (19-30). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wichmann, A., & Timpe, S. (2015). Can dynamic visualizations with variable control enhance the acquisition of intuitive knowledge? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24, 709–720.
Wu, H., K., Lin, Y., F., & Hsu, Y., S. (2013). Effects of representation sequences and spatial ability on students’ scientific understandings about the mechanism of breathing. Instructional Science, 41, 555-573.
Yang, E. M., Andre, T., & Greenbowe, T. Y. (2003). Spatial ability and the impact of visualization/animation on learning electrochemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 329–349.
Yarden, H., & Yarden, A. (2010). Learning using dynamic and static visualizations: students’ comprehension, prior knowledge and conceptual status of a biotechnological method. Research Science Education. 40, 375–402.
Sudatha, I. G. W., Degeng, I. N. S., & Kamdi, W. (2017). Developing Dynamic Visualization Multimedia on Transportation and Excretion System of Organisms Subject. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(10), 82-88.
Copyright: © 2017 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
