Managing Electronic Records in Malaysian Civil Courts: A Review of Literature

Abdul Halim, N., Ginsim, S., & Baharuddin, S. K. (2015). Case Studies: Admissibility of Digital Records as Evidence in Malaysia, (Amendment 2012), 1–12.
Afshar, M., & Ahmad, K. (2015). A new hybrid model for electronic record management. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 81(3), 489–495.
Alshibly, H. H. A., Chiong, R., & Bao, Y. (2016). Investigating the Critical Success Factors for Implementing Electronic Document Management Systems in Governments?: Evidence From Jordan. Article in Information Systems Management · August 2016, (October). http://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2016.1220213
Asonibare, A. S., & Akaje, H. T. (2015). E- Path To Effective Justice Delivery?: the Nigerian Courts in Perspective, 1–15.
Ataullah, A.A. (2008). A Framework for Records Management in Relational Database Systems, thesis, University of Waterloo, Ontario Canada.
Ku Maisurah Ku Bahador, Abrar Haider, W. S. W. M. S. (2015). Assessing Information Technology Skills Using Maturity Scale Approach: A Case of Malaysian Accounting Firms. Jurnal Teknologi, 1(72:2 (2015)), 1–6.
Bhatt, J. K. (2005). Role of information technology in the Malaysian judicial system: Issues and current trends. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 19(2), 199–208. http://doi.org/10.1080/13600860500131614
Bhebhe S., (2015),"Contemporary diplomatics of the civil and deceased estate case files found at the national archives of Zimbabwe", Records Management Journal, Vol. 25 Iss 1 pp. 107 – 120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-03-2014-0019
Borneo Post Online. (2016). Sultan Sharafuddin?: Protect integrity , independence of judiciary Freedom fares Fly to ASEAN, pp. 1–5.–36.
Bunawan, Ap-azli, Haron H. (2015). A Model for Preserving the Electronic Records Event History Metadata in Malaysia Government Agencies, (July). http://doi.org/10.1109/CIMSim.2015.30
Carey, S.M., Mackin, J.R., & Finigan, M.W. (2012). What works? The Ten key components of Drug Court: Research-based best practices. Drug Court Review, 8(1), 6–42.
Deka G. C., Jasni, M. Z., & Prabhat, M. (2012). ICT’s Role in e-Governance in India and Malaysia: A Review. Journal of Next Generation Information Technology, 3(1), 7–16. http://doi.org/10.4156/jnit.vol3.issue1.23
Federal Constitution of Malaysia (2006), International Law Books Services.
Gordon E. , Hoke J. and CRM. Records lifecycle: a cradle to grave metaphor. An ARMA international publication information management, 2011, (Online) http://content.arma.org/IMM/Libraries/SeptOct_2011_PDFs/IMM_0911_RIM_fundamentals_r ecords_life_cycle.sflb.ashx
Gouanou, M & Marsh, M 2004, ‘Imploding technologies – driven by the records management requirements?’, Records Management Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 62 - 64.
Hamin, Z., Othman, M. B., & Mohamad, A. M. (2012). Benefits and achievements of ICT adoption by the High Courts of Malaysia. SHUSER 2012 - 2012 IEEE Symposium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research, 2(100), 1233–1238. http://doi.org/10.1109/SHUSER.2012.6268803
Hofman, H 2008, ‘The use of standards and models’, in Managing Electronic Records, Facet drug court: Research-based best practices. Drug Court Review, 8(1), 6–42.
Ibarrola, C. and Liz, R. (2012), “Analysis of ICT in the Strategic Modernisation Programme of the Paraguayan Supreme Court”, thesis, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, available at: http://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/20141
International Records Management Trust (IRMT), 2004. Integrating Records Management in ICT Systems: Good Practice Indicators.
Julian, R., & Kelty, S. F. (2015). Forensic science as “risky business”: identifying key risk factors in the forensic process from crime scene to court. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 1(4), 195–206. http://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-09-2015-0044
LoPucki, L.M.( 2008), ‘Court-System Transparency’, Iowa Law Review, vol. 94, p. 481.
Lowry, J. (2013). Correlations between ICT and records policy integration and court case management system functionality: East African case studies. Records Management Journal, 23(1), 51–60. http://doi.org/10.1108/09565691311325022
Mahwengkai and Associates, 2016 retrieved from http://www.mahwengkwai.com/.
Munirah Mohamad, A. (2014). Using ATLAS. ti 7 for Researching the Socio-Legal Implications of ICT Adoption in the Justice System of the High Courts of Malaysia. ATLAS.ti User Conference 2013?: Fostering Dialog on Qualitative Methods, 1–11.
Narkiewicz, D. “Departments: Legal Tech: Effective Use Of Courtroom Technology” March/April, 2004, 26 Pennsylvania Lawyer 57.
Nawroly, S., Rashid, H. H., Saeed, S., & Ali, N. (2016). Evaluating e-Court Services Using the Usability Tests Model Case Study?: Civil Court Case Management. Kurdistan Journal of Applied Research (KJAR), 7684(March 2016, Volume 1, Issue 1), 76–83.
Queensland Parliament. (2015). The Role of the Judiciary, (July) retrieved www.parliament.qld.gov.au records 590 management: Headline findings from a major research project. Archives and Manuscripts, 39(2), 66-94.
Rahmah 2008, Records Management Reform in Malaysian Court of Appeal.
Roslind, K., (2009). Malaysian e-Government Implementation Framework. Dissertation Degree of Masters of Computer Science. Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology. University of Malaya.
Saman, W. S. & Haider, A. (2011). The Implementation of Electronic Records Management System: A Case Study in Malaysian Judiciary. AMCIS 2011 Proceedings - All Submissions, 1–12. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2011_submissions/170
Saman, W. S., & Haider, A. (2013). E-Shariah: Information and Communication Technologies for Shariah Court Management. Legal Information Management, 13(2), 94–106. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1472669613000248
Shafie, S. (2007). e-Government Initiatives in Malaysia and the Role of the National Archives of Malaysia in Digital Records Management. National Archives of Malaysia, 1–15. Retrieved from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un-dpadm/unpan041040.pdf
Shepherd G. & Yeo, (2003). Managing Records: A Handbook of Principles and Practice. London. Facet. p.9.
Steele, J. (2010), “Preserving history, preserving privacy: e-mail, archival ethics, and the law”, Archival lssues, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 99-109.
Texas Judicial Council (2015). Texas Judicial Council Minutes of Meeting June 12, 2015.
The Way Forward - Vision 2020, 1999 available at http://www.wawasan2020.com/vision/index.html
The World Bank (2016). Leveraging Technology To Improve Service Delivery In The Justice Sector In South Korea, (10), 1–6.
Upward, F. (2000). Modelling the continuum as paradigm shift in recordkeeping and archiving processes, and beyond – a personal reflection. Records Management Journal. Vol. 10, No. 3, 2000, pp. 115-139.
Yusof, Z. M., & Mokhtar, U. A. (2015). Records and Information Management?: The Requirement for Functional Classification, (March), 215–218.
Zaki Tun Azmi. (2012). The Malaysian Judiciary: Court Backlog and Delay Reduction Program.
Zakiyy, N., & Hassan, K. H. (2016). The Management Process at the Pretrial Stage under Malaysian Rules of Court 2012, 9571, 28

Zain, N. A. M., Saman, W. S. W. M., & Yatin, S. F. M. (2017). Managing Electronic Records in Malaysian Civil Courts: A Review of Literature. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(8), 831-840.

Copyright: © 2017 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode